Paper · 2025 · Tropical Animal Science Journal

Morphology, Biomass, and Forage Quality of Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 Treated with Soil Ameliorants on Post-Coal Mining Land

A. Kuswoyo; L. Abdullah; P.D.M.H. Karti; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Reclamation of post-coal mining land is a valuable opportunity for transforming the land into agricultural cultivation of forage crops for livestock feed production. We conducted an experiment in the Asamasam coal mining spot, Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, to investigate the effect of some soil ameliorant materials, and Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 (Bioguma-2 sorghum) on morphological characteristics and biomass production. Seven soil ameliorant treatments were tested: control (P0), single applications of humic acid (P1, 28 L ha⁻¹), dolomite (P2, 5.8 t ha⁻¹), and organic compost (P3, 15 t ha⁻¹), and treatment combinations of humic acid + compost (P4), dolomite + compost (P5), and humic acid + dolomite + compost (P6) with the same doses of P1, P2, and P3. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and any significances between treatments were analyzed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The results indicated that the combined ameliorant materials improved morphological characteristics and biomass production. Treatment P6 showed the highest effectiveness on soil quality, plant survival rate, most morphological traits, and all yield parameters, followed by other treatments with comparatively lower performance. P6 produced the highest crude protein content across treatments. The combination of multi-ameliorants (humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost) is more effective than single ameliorants in improving soil quality, plant survival, morphological traits, and biomass yield of Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 on post-coal mining land. These results indicate that using combined soil ameliorants is a promising strategy to enhance forage crop production on degraded mining soils. However, natural declines in plant performance during later harvest stages suggest the need for further nutrient management to sustain productivity over time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment P6 (combined humic acid, dolomite and compost) gave the highest effectiveness on soil quality, plant survival and most morphological traits.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
P6e1
Outcome
soil quality, plant survival rate, most morphological traitse1
Direction
highest effectivenesse1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Treatment P6 showed the highest effectiveness on soil quality, plant survival rate, most morphological traits, and all yield parameters, followed by other treatments with comparatively lower performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1237 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment P6 gave the highest effectiveness on all yield parameters.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
P6e1
Outcome
all yield parameterse1
Direction
highest effectivenesse1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Treatment P6 showed the highest effectiveness on soil quality, plant survival rate, most morphological traits, and all yield parameters, followed by other treatments with comparatively lower performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1237 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment P6 produced the highest crude protein content across treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
P6e1
Outcome
crude protein contente1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
across treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“P6 produced the highest crude protein content across treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined multi-ameliorants were more effective than single ameliorants for soil quality, plant survival and morphological traits.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
multi-ameliorants (humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost)e1
Outcome
soil quality, plant survival, morphological traitse1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
single ameliorantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The combination of multi-ameliorants (humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost) is more effective than single ameliorants in improving soil quality, plant survival, morphological traits, and biomass yield of Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 on post-coal mining land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined multi-ameliorants were more effective than single ameliorants for biomass yield.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
multi-ameliorants (humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost)e1
Outcome
biomass yielde1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
single ameliorantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The combination of multi-ameliorants (humic acid, dolomite, and organic compost) is more effective than single ameliorants in improving soil quality, plant survival, morphological traits, and biomass yield of Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2 on post-coal mining land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1567 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil ameliorants are a promising strategy to enhance forage crop production on degraded mining soils.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
combined soil ameliorantse1
Outcome
forage crop productione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results indicate that using combined soil ameliorants is a promising strategy to enhance forage crop production on degraded mining soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1711 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant performance declined naturally during later harvest stages.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Organ / stage
later harvest stagese1
Outcome
plant performancee1
Direction
declinese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“natural declines in plant performance during later harvest stages suggest the need for further nutrient management to sustain productivity over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1870 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sorghum bicolor cv. Bioguma-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–72 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

92 papers: 80 positive, 12 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

lime · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.