Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Different Levels of Chemical and Nano Nitrogenous Fertilizers on Yield and Yield attributes of Sorghum Crop (Sorghum bicolor L.) cv. Gundri

Barkha Rani; Bhorania Nirali; N. M. Zalawadia; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A pot culture experiment was conducted during summer 2017 at Department of Agril. Chemistry & Soil Science, College of Agriculture, JAU, Junagadh to study effect of chemical and nano nitrogenous fertilizer on growth, yield and yield attributes by sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) crop. The investigation was carried out in CRD design three replication with seven different treatments. The treatments included T1 = Absolute control (No fertilizer), T2 = Nano polymer, T3 = RDN dose of sorghum crop through chemical fertilizer, T4 = NN2.5-2.5 times reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer, T5 = NN5-5 times reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer, T6= NN10-10 times reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer, T7 = RDN through nano fertilizer. The results revealed that the application of 2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer significantly increased growth parameters, yields and quality characters of sorghum crop. This also brought significant increase in content and uptake of nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nano fertilizer significantly increased sorghum growth parameters.

Taxon
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cropSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizere1
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–280 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer significantly increased growth parameters, yields and quality characters of sorghum crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nano fertilizer significantly increased sorghum yields and quality characters.

Taxon
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cropSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizere1
Outcome
yields and quality characterse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–280 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer significantly increased growth parameters, yields and quality characters of sorghum crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment significantly increased nutrient content and uptake.

Taxon
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cropSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizere1
Outcome
content and uptake of nutrientse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–280 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer significantly increased growth parameters, yields and quality characters of sorghum crop. This also brought significant increase in content and uptake of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–997 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 38 positive, 3 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.