Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Benefits and Trade-Offs of Long-Term Organic Fertilization Substitution: Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial

Yumin Liu; Xiaolin Zhou; Zishuang Li; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Optimizing organic fertilizer substitution is essential for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture and achieving a balance between crop productivity, nutritional quality, and environmental safety. Here, we conducted an 11-year field experiment to evaluate the effects of substituting 50% of mineral fertilizers with pig manure (PM) or cattle manure (CM) on the nutritional quality of wheat grain, heavy metal (HM) accumulation, and associated human health risks. The yield and protein content were highest in the mineral fertilizer (MF) treatment, and grain micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn) were 6.7–13.8% higher under organic substitution (PM/CM) than in the MF treatment. The Ni, Pb, and As contents were 35.4–43.0% higher in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment, which stems from the higher HM content in pig manure. Health risk assessments indicated that the Hazard Index (HI) for children exceeded 1 in the PM treatment, primarily due to As, which accounted for 69.6% of the HI. All treatments remained within safe thresholds, although As and Pb posed detectable carcinogenic health risks. The higher levels of Ni and As in pig manure likewise led to a significant increase in the health risk associated with the PM treatment compared to the MF treatment. We developed a novel Grain Quality Index (GQI) that combined nutrient and HM data, which indicated that the nutritional quality of wheat grain was similar in the CM and MF treatments. The GQI was 9.1% lower in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment. These findings suggest that the substitution of mineral fertilizer with cow manure can help achieve a balance between yield, nutrition, and safety, and more stringent regulation of HMs is required for the use of pig manure. Our findings provide actionable insights with implications for sustainable wheat production policies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and protein content were highest in the mineral fertilizer (MF) treatment.

Treatment
mineral fertilizer (MF)e1
Outcome
yield and protein contente1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
pig manure (PM) or cattle manure (CM)e0
Setting
11-Year Field Trialt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield and protein content were highest in the mineral fertilizer (MF) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–551 · show in text ↑
e0

“substituting 50% of mineral fertilizers with pig manure (PM) or cattle manure (CM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain micronutrients Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn were 6.7–13.8% higher under organic substitution than under MF.

Treatment
organic substitution (PM/CM)e2
Outcome
grain micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn)e2
Direction
highere2
Value
6.7–13.8%e2
Comparator
MF treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn) were 6.7–13.8% higher under organic substitution (PM/CM) than in the MF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ni, Pb and As contents were 35.4–43.0% higher in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment.

Treatment
PM treatmente3
Outcome
The Ni, Pb, and As contentse3
Direction
highere3
Value
35.4–43.0%e3
Comparator
MF treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Ni, Pb, and As contents were 35.4–43.0% higher in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–773 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher Ni, Pb and As contents in the PM treatment stem from the higher heavy metal content of pig manure.

Treatment
PM treatmente3
Outcome
The Ni, Pb, and As contentse3
Qualifier
higher HM content in pig manuree4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Ni, Pb, and As contents were 35.4–43.0% higher in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–773 · show in text ↑
e4

“which stems from the higher HM content in pig manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Hazard Index for children exceeded 1 in the PM treatment.

Treatment
PM treatmente5
Outcome
Hazard Index (HI) for childrene5
Direction
exceedede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e5

“Health risk assessments indicated that the Hazard Index (HI) for children exceeded 1 in the PM treatment, primarily due to As, which accounted for 69.6% of the HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–991 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arsenic accounted for 69.6% of the Hazard Index in the PM treatment.

Compound
Ase5
Outcome
the HIe5
Value
69.6%e5
Qualifier
primarily due to Ase5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e5

“Health risk assessments indicated that the Hazard Index (HI) for children exceeded 1 in the PM treatment, primarily due to As, which accounted for 69.6% of the HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–991 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments remained within safe thresholds for health risk.

Outcome
safe thresholdse6
Direction
remained withine6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e6

“All treatments remained within safe thresholds, although As and Pb posed detectable carcinogenic health risks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As and Pb posed detectable carcinogenic health risks.

Compound
As and Pbe6
Outcome
carcinogenic health riskse6
Qualifier
detectablee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e6

“All treatments remained within safe thresholds, although As and Pb posed detectable carcinogenic health risks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Health risk was significantly higher in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment.

Treatment
PM treatmente7
Outcome
health riske7
Direction
increasee7
Comparator
MF treatmente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e7

“The higher levels of Ni and As in pig manure likewise led to a significant increase in the health risk associated with the PM treatment compared to the MF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Grain Quality Index was 9.1% lower in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment.

Treatment
PM treatmente0
Outcome
GQIe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
9.1%e0
Comparator
MF treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e0

“The GQI was 9.1% lower in the PM treatment than in the MF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1521 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Grain Quality Index indicated similar nutritional quality of wheat grain in the CM and MF treatments.

Outcome
nutritional quality of wheat graine1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
MFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“indicated that the nutritional quality of wheat grain was similar in the CM and MF treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1452 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting mineral fertilizer with cow manure can help achieve a balance between yield, nutrition and safety.

Treatment
substitution of mineral fertilizer with cow manuree2
Outcome
a balance between yield, nutrition, and safetye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“substitution of mineral fertilizer with cow manure can help achieve a balance between yield, nutrition, and safety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1669 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More stringent regulation of heavy metals is required for the use of pig manure.

Treatment
pig manuree3
Outcome
regulation of HMse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain Nutrition and Heavy Metal Risks in an 11-Year Field Trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–142 · show in text ↑
e3

“more stringent regulation of HMs is required for the use of pig manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1745 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.