Paper · 2025 · Discover Agriculture

Evaluation of sustainable biorational pesticides for managing Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on tomato in Nepal

Dipak Khanal; Utkal Sapkota; Gresha Suwal; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae] is a highly polyphagous pest leading to a substantial yield loss of tomato crop globally, including in Nepal. The increasing use of harmful pesticides to control this pest has resulted in severe environmental impacts and human health hazards. To evaluate alternative solutions, an experiment was conducted in Rupandehi District, Nepal assessing the efficacy of six biorational pesticides against H. armigera. The tested treatments included: Pacer® [ Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) 1% WP @ 5 g/L], Mahastra® ( Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki @ 2 g/L), Tracer® (Spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/L), Neemraj Super® (Azadirachtin 3000 ppm @ 5 ml/L), Biotrine® (Abamectin 5 EC @ 1 ml/L), and Alcora® (Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.4 ml/L). The study employed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) to ensure robust statistical analysis of treatment effects. The pesticide treatments were applied four times at 15—day intervals. H. armigera population density per plot was recorded 3, 7 and 10 days after each application. Biological yield and marketable yield were assessed 93 days after transplantation. The effects of each treatment were assessed by comparing the mean H. armigera infestation scale, the percentage reduction in larval population relative to the control, and both biological and marketable yields. Among all treatments Chlorantraniliprole demonstrated superior efficacy, achieving an 87% reduction in larval populations compared to the control. This treatment also yielded the highest marketable fruit production (21.85 t/ha) and the most favourable benefit–cost ratio (6.53). Spinosad showed a 79% reduction in pest population, a marketable yield of 21.57 t/ha, and a benefit–cost ratio of 6.14 ranking as the second most effective treatment. The microbial and botanical pesticides showed moderate efficacy. Although being less efficient Azadirachtin was found to be more economical than Abamectin. Therefore, this study guides to the development of integrated pest management (IPM) strategies by including locally produced botanicals to combat tomato fruit borers in Nepal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole achieved an 87% reduction in Helicoverpa armigera larval populations on tomato compared to the control.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
reduction in larval populationse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
87%e0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
Nepalt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorantraniliprole demonstrated superior efficacy, achieving an 87% reduction in larval populations compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole yielded the highest marketable fruit production at 21.85 t/ha.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee0
Outcome
marketable fruit productione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
21.85 t/hae1
Setting
Nepalt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorantraniliprole demonstrated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1431 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also yielded the highest marketable fruit production (21.85 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole gave the most favourable benefit-cost ratio of 6.53.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee0
Outcome
benefit–cost ratioe1
Direction
most favourablee1
Value
6.53e1
Setting
Nepalt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorantraniliprole demonstrated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1431 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most favourable benefit–cost ratio (6.53)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced the Helicoverpa armigera pest population by 79%.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
reduction in pest populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
79%e0
Setting
Nepalt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinosad showed a 79% reduction in pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave a marketable yield of 21.57 t/ha, ranking second most effective.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Value
21.57 t/hae0
Setting
Nepalt1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinosad showed a 79% reduction in pest population, a marketable yield of 21.57 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave a benefit-cost ratio of 6.14.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Outcome
benefit–cost ratioe0
Value
6.14e0
Setting
Nepalt1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinosad showed a 79% reduction in pest population, a marketable yield of 21.57 t/ha, and a benefit–cost ratio of 6.14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The microbial and botanical pesticides showed moderate efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera on tomato.

Treatment
The microbial and botanical pesticidese0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
efficacye0
Qualifier
moderatee0
Setting
Nepalt1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The microbial and botanical pesticides showed moderate efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin, although less efficient, was more economical than Abamectin.

Treatment
Azadirachtine0
Outcome
economicale0
Direction
more economicale0
Comparator
Abamectine0
Setting
Nepalt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although being less efficient Azadirachtin was found to be more economical than Abamectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–1978 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the study guides integrated pest management development including locally produced botanicals to combat tomato fruit borers in Nepal.

Outcome
development of integrated pest management (IPM) strategies by including locally produced botanicalse0
Setting
Nepale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this study guides to the development of integrated pest management (IPM) strategies by including locally produced botanicals to combat tomato fruit borers in Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2154 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

spinosad · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.