Paper · 2025 · Plant and Soil

Early inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi shifts metabolic functions of rhizosphere bacteria in field-grown tomato plants

Beatriz Moreno; Javier Lidoy; Martin Aguirrebengoa; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Aim The study explores the functional plasticity of rhizosphere microbiomes in response to microbial inoculants, a topic not yet fully explored in open-field agroecosystems. Specifically, it assesses the lasting impact of nursery-stage inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Rhizophagus irregularis and symbiosis-stimulating compounds on the rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum . Methods Tomato seedlings were inoculated with R. irregularis in a commercial nursery. During this period, seedlings were irrigated weekly with strigolactone analogues and the flavonoid quercetin, both with and without AMF inoculation. At harvest, five months post-transplanting, rhizosphere samples were collected for mycorrhizal colonization assessment and predictive metagenomic profiling. Results Nursery AMF inoculation, especially when combined with the strigolactone mimic SL-M2 and quercetin, significantly enhanced mycorrhizal colonization. Although all plants became colonized, early inoculation did not affect bacterial or fungal taxonomic composition at harvest. However, it induced substantial shifts in predicted bacterial metabolic functions, affecting 137 of 154 KEGG modules. These changes, which included key metabolic shifts—such as reduced energy metabolism, increased carbohydrate degradation over lipid or amino acid metabolism, and enriched biosynthesis of stress-responsive metabolites—occurred independently of later colonization or signalling molecule application. Conclusions Early AMF inoculation primes the rhizosphere bacteriome toward a stress-adapted functional state, likely mediated by altered root exudation during early symbiosis. The application of SL-M2 and quercetin further supports their role as prebiotics in sustaining inoculant efficacy. This study provides mechanistic insight into how nursery-stage microbial interventions can shape rhizosphere functionality, offering promising strategies for microbiome-driven improvements in sustainable agriculture. Graphical Abstract

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery AMF inoculation combined with SL-M2 and quercetin significantly enhanced mycorrhizal colonization of tomato.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
Nursery AMF inoculation, especially when combined with the strigolactone mimic SL-M2 and quercetine1
Interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise2symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione1
Direction
enhancede1
Setting
commercial nurserye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nursery AMF inoculation, especially when combined with the strigolactone mimic SL-M2 and quercetin, significantly enhanced mycorrhizal colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–965 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tomato seedlings were inoculated with R. irregularis in a commercial nursery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–502 · show in text ↑
e3

“rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early inoculation did not affect bacterial or fungal taxonomic composition of the tomato rhizosphere at harvest.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
early inoculatione4
Outcome
bacterial or fungal taxonomic compositione4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“early inoculation did not affect bacterial or fungal taxonomic composition at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1090 · show in text ↑
e3

“rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early inoculation induced substantial shifts in predicted bacterial metabolic functions, affecting 137 of 154 KEGG modules.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
early inoculatione4
Outcome
predicted bacterial metabolic functionse5
Direction
shiftse5
Value
137 of 154 KEGG modulese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“it induced substantial shifts in predicted bacterial metabolic functions, affecting 137 of 154 KEGG modules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1208 · show in text ↑
e4

“early inoculation did not affect bacterial or fungal taxonomic composition at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1090 · show in text ↑
e3

“rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early inoculation shifted predicted bacterial metabolism toward reduced energy metabolism.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
early inoculatione4
Outcome
energy metabolisme6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“reduced energy metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1294 · show in text ↑
e4

“early inoculation did not affect bacterial or fungal taxonomic composition at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1090 · show in text ↑
e3

“rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early inoculation shifted predicted bacterial metabolism toward increased carbohydrate degradation over lipid or amino acid metabolism.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
early inoculatione4
Outcome
carbohydrate degradatione7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“increased carbohydrate degradation over lipid or amino acid metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1366 · show in text ↑
e4

“early inoculation did not affect bacterial or fungal taxonomic composition at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1090 · show in text ↑
e3

“rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early inoculation enriched predicted bacterial biosynthesis of stress-responsive metabolites.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
early inoculatione4
Outcome
biosynthesis of stress-responsive metabolitese6
Direction
enrichede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“enriched biosynthesis of stress-responsive metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1426 · show in text ↑
e4

“early inoculation did not affect bacterial or fungal taxonomic composition at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1090 · show in text ↑
e3

“rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early AMF inoculation likely primes the tomato rhizosphere bacteriome toward a stress-adapted functional state through altered root exudation.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume3
Treatment
Early AMF inoculatione5
Outcome
stress-adapted functional statee5
Qualifier
altered root exudation during early symbiosise5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Early AMF inoculation primes the rhizosphere bacteriome toward a stress-adapted functional state, likely mediated by altered root exudation during early symbiosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1682 · show in text ↑
e3

“rhizosphere microbiome of Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑

quercetin · Rhizophagus irregularis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Rhizophagus irregularis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus irregularis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.