Paper · 2025 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat under drought stress during stem elongation

Mengting He; Hanxiao Li; Zhuangzhuang Sun; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• Drought priming enhances photosynthesis and antioxidant defenses to improve drought tolerance. • Spike development is stabilized to promote floret differentiation and fertility under drought through priming. • Optimized carbon metabolism and hormones support stress adaptation and yield improvement. Drought stress is a significant environmental stressor that can have detrimental effects on crop yields, especially during stem elongation. Drought priming has emerged as a promising technique for enhancing plant drought tolerance. However, the effects of drought priming on the differentiation process of spike and its physiological basis of wheat are not clear. In this study, we investigated the effects of drought priming on the development of spike under drought stress by applying drought priming at the three-leaf stage and drought stress during stem elongation. Our study demonstrated that drought priming significantly increased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaves by approximately 25.7% and improved leaf water potential by 17.4% during drought stress. Moreover, it mitigated oxidative damage, reducing hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels by 30.6 and 11.1%, respectively, during stem elongation. Drought priming also markedly enhanced the activity of key carbon metabolism enzymes, hexokinase and fructokinase, by 170.0 and 236.0%, respectively. This improved carbon metabolism stabilized spike differentiation, leading to increased spikelet and floret primordia formation. Ultimately, drought priming achieved a 13.8% increase in kernel number per spike, demonstrating its potential to improve grain yield under drought conditions. This study innovatively reveals the “carbon homeostasis-spike development” coordination mechanism underlying drought priming-enhanced reproductive stress tolerance. The findings advance our understanding of stress memory spatiotemporal regulation in crops and offer transformative solutions for stabilizing wheat production under climate change scenarios.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought priming increased flag-leaf photosynthetic rate by approximately 25.7% during drought.

Treatment
drought priminge0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate of flag leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approximately 25.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought priming significantly increased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaves by approximately 25.7% and improved leaf water potential by 17.4% during drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought priming improved leaf water potential by 17.4% during drought.

Treatment
drought priminge0
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
improvede0
Value
17.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought priming significantly increased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaves by approximately 25.7% and improved leaf water potential by 17.4% during drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought priming reduced hydrogen peroxide by 30.6% during stem elongation.

Organ / stage
stem elongatione0
Treatment
Drought primingt0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
30.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels by 30.6 and 11.1%, respectively, during stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought priming reduced malondialdehyde levels by 11.1% during stem elongation.

Treatment
Drought primingt0
Outcome
malondialdehyde levelse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
11.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels by 30.6 and 11.1%, respectively, during stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought priming enhanced hexokinase activity by 170.0%.

Treatment
Drought priminge0
Gene
hexokinasee0
Outcome
activity of key carbon metabolism enzymese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
170.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought priming also markedly enhanced the activity of key carbon metabolism enzymes, hexokinase and fructokinase, by 170.0 and 236.0%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought priming enhanced fructokinase activity by 236.0%.

Treatment
Drought priminge0
Gene
fructokinasee0
Outcome
activity of key carbon metabolism enzymese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
236.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought priming also markedly enhanced the activity of key carbon metabolism enzymes, hexokinase and fructokinase, by 170.0 and 236.0%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved carbon metabolism stabilized spike differentiation and increased spikelet and floret primordia formation.

Outcome
increased spikelet and floret primordia formatione0
Qualifier
improved carbon metabolisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This improved carbon metabolism stabilized spike differentiation, leading to increased spikelet and floret primordia formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought priming increased kernel number per spike by 13.8% under drought.

Treatment
drought priminge0
Outcome
kernel number per spikee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought priming achieved a 13.8% increase in kernel number per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Drought priming enhances young spike development in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 8 positive, 13 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 18 positive, 110 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 204 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.