Abstract
Abstract Lettuce is a cool-season leafy green commonly grown in hydroponics. Romaine lettuce is economically expensive, yet it has more desirable health benefits and market demand than other lettuce types. However, high electrical conductivity (> 2.0 dS m −1 ) of water impacts nutrient supply and growth, thus affecting its economic viability. Despite negative impact of salt stress on hydroponically grown lettuce, its effects on the plant’s morphology, physiology, biochemistry, and nutritional content remains unexplored. In this study, two romaine lettuce genotypes, Green Forest (GF) and Burgundy Delight (BD), were subjected to two sodium chloride treatments (NaCl, 0 and 100 mM) at the late-rosette stage for 9 days to assess the difference in salt tolerance. Salt stress reduced GF’s fresh biomass by 57.3%, while BD displayed a 20% lesser reduction. BD had higher potassium retention even under higher sodium accumulation than GF. The photosynthetic efficiency of GF decreased by 19.3% with a 45.4% transpiration reduction under salt stress, while both traits in BD remained constant. Chlorophyll fluorescence (steady-state fluorescence) decreased on average by 8.5%, with a more significant reduction for GF (10%). Salt stress reduced glucose in GF by 31.5% and increased by 20% in BD. Under salt stress, BD accumulated higher phenolics and flavonoids than GF. Hyperspectral signatures exhibited reduced reflectance in the green and water band regions under salt stress. BD showed improved osmoregulation, potassium retention, and hyperaccumulation of iron and zinc, making it a salt-tolerant donor for developing improved salt-tolerant romaine genotypes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress reduced Green Forest fresh biomass by 57.3%.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativat0 - Material
- GFe0
- Treatment
- Salt stresse0
- Outcome
- fresh biomasse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 57.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Salt stress reduced GF’s fresh biomass by 57.3%”
t0“lettuce”
Claim · model-written summary
Green Forest photosynthetic efficiency declined by 19.3%.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativat0 - Material
- GFe0
- Treatment
- salt stresse0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic efficiencye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 19.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic efficiency of GF decreased by 19.3% with a 45.4% transpiration reduction under salt stress”
t0“lettuce”
Claim · model-written summary
Green Forest transpiration declined by 45.4%.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativat0 - Material
- GFe0
- Treatment
- salt stresse0
- Outcome
- transpiratione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 45.4%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The photosynthetic efficiency of GF decreased by 19.3% with a 45.4% transpiration reduction under salt stress”
t0“lettuce”
Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress reduced glucose in GF by 31.5%.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativat0 - Material
- GFe0
- Treatment
- Salt stresse0
- Outcome
- glucosee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 31.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Salt stress reduced glucose in GF by 31.5%”
t0“lettuce”
Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress increased glucose in BD by 20%.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativat0 - Material
- BDe0
- Treatment
- Salt stresse0
- Outcome
- glucosee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 20%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Salt stress reduced glucose in GF by 31.5% and increased by 20% in BD”
t0“lettuce”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →salinity · physiology: gas exchange · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →salinity · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.