Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Coupled effects of blended urea application under the ridge-furrow system on spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau

Fan Zhang; Mengru Chen; Qiqi Chen; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Ridge-furrow system significantly improves the yield and resource utilization efficiency of rain-fed spring maize, but its underlying mechanism with different urea application strategies remains unclear. This study conducted a field experiment of planting method (ridge-furrow system and flat planting) and urea application strategy (no urea, conventional urea, controlled release urea, and blended urea) in the Loess Plateau to assess the effects on spring maize productivity and resource use efficiency. Compared with flat planting, the ridge-furrow system significantly increased water productivity (18.80 %), nitrogen use efficiency (2.70 %), dry matter accumulation (16.34 %), and yield (19.71 %). Water productivity, evapotranspiration, nitrogen use efficiency, crop agronomic traits, and yield were optimized under blended urea application. Applying blended urea under the ridge-furrow system improved agronomic traits, yield, and resource use efficiency, and reduce NO 3 – -N leaching. Yield and its composition were closely related to water-nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic traits. Blended urea application under the ridge-furrow system improved agronomic traits by optimizing water-nitrogen use efficiency, thereby enhancing yield and its composition in rain-fed spring maize growing areas. Nitrogen use efficiency and water productivity were considered as the largest direct and indirect factors affecting yield formation, respectively. Blended urea application under the ridge-furrow system could be used as an optimal strategy for achieving high yield, high efficiency, and environmental sustainability in the rain-fed spring maize cultivation system. The results provide an important scientific reference for the development of sustainable field management strategy of spring maize cultivation in the Loess Plateau.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ridge-furrow system increased water productivity by 18.80 % relative to flat planting in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ridge-furrow systeme1
Outcome
water productivitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18.80 %e1
Comparator
flat plantinge1
Setting
Loess Plateaut0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with flat planting, the ridge-furrow system significantly increased water productivity (18.80 %), nitrogen use efficiency (2.70 %), dry matter accumulation (16.34 %), and yield (19.71 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ridge-furrow system increased nitrogen use efficiency by 2.70 % relative to flat planting in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ridge-furrow systeme1
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
2.70 %e1
Comparator
flat plantinge1
Setting
Loess Plateaut0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with flat planting, the ridge-furrow system significantly increased water productivity (18.80 %), nitrogen use efficiency (2.70 %), dry matter accumulation (16.34 %), and yield (19.71 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ridge-furrow system increased dry matter accumulation by 16.34 % relative to flat planting in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ridge-furrow systeme1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.34 %e1
Comparator
flat plantinge1
Setting
Loess Plateaut0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with flat planting, the ridge-furrow system significantly increased water productivity (18.80 %), nitrogen use efficiency (2.70 %), dry matter accumulation (16.34 %), and yield (19.71 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ridge-furrow system increased yield by 19.71 % relative to flat planting in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ridge-furrow systeme1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
19.71 %e1
Comparator
flat plantinge1
Setting
Loess Plateaut0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with flat planting, the ridge-furrow system significantly increased water productivity (18.80 %), nitrogen use efficiency (2.70 %), dry matter accumulation (16.34 %), and yield (19.71 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity, evapotranspiration and nitrogen use efficiency were optimized under blended urea application in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
blended urea applicatione2
Outcome
Water productivity, evapotranspiration, nitrogen use efficiencye2
Direction
optimizede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water productivity, evapotranspiration, nitrogen use efficiency, crop agronomic traits, and yield were optimized under blended urea application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop agronomic traits and yield were optimized under blended urea application in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
blended urea applicatione2
Outcome
crop agronomic traits, and yielde2
Direction
optimizede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water productivity, evapotranspiration, nitrogen use efficiency, crop agronomic traits, and yield were optimized under blended urea application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying blended urea under the ridge-furrow system reduced NO3–-N leaching in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Applying blended urea under the ridge-furrow systeme3
Outcome
NO 3 – -N leachinge3
Direction
reducee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“Applying blended urea under the ridge-furrow system improved agronomic traits, yield, and resource use efficiency, and reduce NO 3 – -N leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–992 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and its composition were closely related to water-nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic traits in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
water-nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic traitse4
Outcome
Yield and its compositione4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“Yield and its composition were closely related to water-nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1094 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency and water productivity were the largest direct and indirect factors affecting yield formation in spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Nitrogen use efficiency and water productivitye5
Outcome
largest direct and indirect factors affecting yield formatione5
Direction
largeste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nitrogen use efficiency and water productivity were considered as the largest direct and indirect factors affecting yield formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1437 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Blended urea under the ridge-furrow system is an optimal strategy for high yield, high efficiency and environmental sustainability in rain-fed spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
optimal strategy for achieving high yield, high efficiency, and environmental sustainabilitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e6

“Blended urea application under the ridge-furrow system could be used as an optimal strategy for achieving high yield, high efficiency, and environmental sustainability in the rain-fed spring maize cultivation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1668 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended urea under the ridge-furrow system improved agronomic traits by optimizing water-nitrogen use efficiency, thereby enhancing yield.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Blended urea application under the ridge-furrow systeme7
Outcome
agronomic traitse7
Qualifier
by optimizing water-nitrogen use efficiencye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize productivity and water-nitrogen use efficiency in the Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“Blended urea application under the ridge-furrow system improved agronomic traits by optimizing water-nitrogen use efficiency, thereby enhancing yield and its composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1265 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.