Abstract
Capsicum hybrid Mekong was grown under naturally ventilated polyhouse during summer season of 2012 at Vegetable Research Farm, Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSKHPKV Palampur, Himachal Pradesh. Planting was done in two rows on 0.9 m wide bed leaving 60 cm path between two beds following the spacing of 60 cm 30 cm (S 1 ) and 45 cm 30 cm (S 2 ), with double (T 1 ), three (T 2 ) and four (T 3 ) stems and fertilized (F 1 ) twice a week and (F 2 ) thrice a week. The data were analyzed statistically following Factorial Randomized Block Design. The result revealed that the plant height, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit breadth, pericarp thickness were significantly more in S 1 T 1 F 2 treatment. The number of fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant, yield/ m 2 and benefit cost ratio was significantly superior in S 1 T 3 F 2 treatment. While there was no significant effect of spacing, training and fertigation levels on days to 50 per cent flowering, days to first harvest, harvest duration and shelf life at room temperature.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
S 1 T 1 F 2 significantly increased plant height.
CapsicumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit breadth, pericarp thickness were significantly more in S 1 T 1 F 2 treatment”
t0“capsicum”
Claim · model-written summary
S 1 T 1 F 2 significantly increased fruit weight, length and breadth.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit weight, fruit length, fruit breadth, pericarp thickness were significantly more in S 1 T 1 F 2 treatment”
t0“capsicum”
Claim · model-written summary
S 1 T 1 F 2 significantly increased pericarp thickness.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pericarp thickness were significantly more in S 1 T 1 F 2 treatment”
t0“capsicum”
Claim · model-written summary
S 1 T 3 F 2 was significantly superior in number of fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant and yield per square metre.
- Treatment
- S 1 T 3 F 2e0
- Outcome
- number of fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant, yield/ m 2e0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant, yield/ m 2 and benefit cost ratio was significantly superior in S 1 T 3 F 2 treatment”
t0“capsicum”
Claim · model-written summary
S 1 T 3 F 2 was significantly superior in benefit cost ratio.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit cost ratio was significantly superior in S 1 T 3 F 2 treatment”
t0“capsicum”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing, training and fertigation had no significant effect on flowering and harvest timing.
- Treatment
- spacing, training and fertigation levelse0
- Outcome
- days to 50 per cent flowering, days to first harvest, harvest duratione0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant effect of spacing, training and fertigation levels on days to 50 per cent flowering, days to first harvest, harvest duration and shelf life at room temperature”
t0“capsicum”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing, training and fertigation had no significant effect on shelf life at room temperature.
- Treatment
- spacing, training and fertigation levelse0
- Outcome
- shelf life at room temperaturee0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant effect of spacing, training and fertigation levels on days to 50 per cent flowering, days to first harvest, harvest duration and shelf life at room temperature”
t0“capsicum”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 152 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
159 papers more in this group
See all 163 papers →density · quality: postharvest · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →density · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.