Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of various organic and inorganic fertilizer combinations on the growth, yield, and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The study investigated nine different nutrient management treatments, including control, varying percentages of recommended doses of fertilizers (RDF), vermicompost, and Rhizobium inoculation, both individually and in combination. Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields. Specifically, the treatment combining 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculation consistently outperformed other treatments, leading to the highest yields and improved seed nutrient content (NPK). Economic analysis further revealed that INM practices significantly increased gross returns and net profits, demonstrating their economic viability and sustainability. This research underscores the critical role of balanced nutrient application through INM for maximizing chickpea productivity and ensuring long-term agricultural sustainability.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management enhanced plant population, height, branching in chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
- Outcome
- plant population, height, branchinge0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”
e0“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management enhanced pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation in chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
- Outcome
- pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”
e0“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management enhanced 100-seed weight in chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
- Outcome
- 100-seed weighte0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”
e0“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management enhanced grain, straw, and biological yields in chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
- Outcome
- grain, straw, and biological yieldse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”
e0“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined RDF, vermicompost and Rhizobium treatment produced the highest yields.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculatione1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”
e1“the treatment combining 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculation consistently outperformed other treatments, leading to the highest yields and improved seed nutrient content (NPK).”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved seed nutrient content.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculatione1
- Outcome
- seed nutrient content (NPK)e1
- Direction
- improvede1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”
e1“the treatment combining 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculation consistently outperformed other treatments, leading to the highest yields and improved seed nutrient content (NPK).”
Claim · model-written summary
INM increased gross returns and net profits.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- INM practicese2
- Outcome
- gross returns and net profitse2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”
e2“INM practices significantly increased gross returns and net profits”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →fertilization · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.