Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Influence of different scion-rootstock combinations on sugars, polyamines, antioxidants and malondialdehyde in grafted grapevines under arid conditions

Sonu Krishankumar; Jacobus J. Hunter; Mohammed Alyafei; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Grapevines are an important and economically significant fruit plant that is cultivated worldwide. Most of the world's emerging wine-growing regions are in arid or semi-arid regions that are severely affected by drought. Grafting has emerged as an effective strategy to enhance drought tolerance, but the influence of scion-rootstock combinations on key biochemical and antioxidant parameters under water deficit conditions is not fully understood. Method: The study investigates the effects of grafting on antioxidant enzymes, malondialdehyde (MDA), polyamines and sugar metabolism in five grafted grapevine combinations exposed to three irrigation levels to optimise sustainable grape production in the arid regions of the UAE. Leaf samples were analysed for polyamines, MDA and sugars using liquid chromatography. Results: The study found that the drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey increased cell activity, reduced ROS production, lowered MDA levels and increased antioxidant capabilities. SOD activity increased significantly under 75% and 50% FC by 225% in V1, 316% in V3, 133% in V4 and 1025% in V5. In response to severe drought at 75% and 50% FC, V2 and V5 showed a decrease in MDA accumulation (by 34.2% and 50% in V2 and 23.7% and 57.6% in V5, respectively) compared to 100% FC (0.76 nmoL mL-1 in V2 and 1.18 nmoL mL-1 in V5). Polyamines generally showed an increase with decreasing field capacity, indicating drought tolerance. Different polyamine contents were observed in grafted vines. V1, V2 and V5 showed higher levels of spermine and free spermidine, while V3 and V4 were more sensitive to drought stress. Organic osmolytes positively influenced the enzymatic activity in drought-tolerant grafts. Sugars built up in the grafts and had a signalling function as Osmo protective molecules. The shoots improved sugar metabolism, which led to increased resistance to drought. There was a significant increase in glucose sugar content at 75% and 50% FC, which was 85.7% to 133% at V1, 19% to 76.9% at V2, and decreased by 30% and 53% at V4. Discussion: The results suggest that grafted grapevines have a strong ability to cope with drought stress by upregulating antioxidant enzymes and altering other compounds such as MDA, PA and sugars that are conducive to stress tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 75% and 50% FC, SOD activity in V1 increased significantly by 225%.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V1e1
Treatment
75% and 50% FCe1
Outcome
SOD activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
225%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“SOD activity increased significantly under 75% and 50% FC by 225% in V1, 316% in V3, 133% in V4 and 1025% in V5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 75% and 50% FC, SOD activity in V3 increased significantly by 316%.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V3e1
Treatment
75% and 50% FCe1
Outcome
SOD activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
316%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“SOD activity increased significantly under 75% and 50% FC by 225% in V1, 316% in V3, 133% in V4 and 1025% in V5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 75% and 50% FC, SOD activity in V4 increased significantly by 133%.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V4e1
Treatment
75% and 50% FCe1
Outcome
SOD activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
133%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“SOD activity increased significantly under 75% and 50% FC by 225% in V1, 316% in V3, 133% in V4 and 1025% in V5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 75% and 50% FC, SOD activity in V5 increased significantly by 1025%.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V5e1
Treatment
75% and 50% FCe1
Outcome
SOD activitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1025%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“SOD activity increased significantly under 75% and 50% FC by 225% in V1, 316% in V3, 133% in V4 and 1025% in V5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought at 75% and 50% FC, MDA accumulation in V2 decreased by 34.2% and 50% relative to 100% FC.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V2e3
Treatment
severe drought at 75% and 50% FCe3
Outcome
MDA accumulatione3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
34.2% and 50%e3
Comparator
100% FCe3

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“In response to severe drought at 75% and 50% FC, V2 and V5 showed a decrease in MDA accumulation (by 34.2% and 50% in V2 and 23.7% and 57.6% in V5, respectively) compared to 100% FC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought at 75% and 50% FC, MDA accumulation in V5 decreased by 23.7% and 57.6% relative to 100% FC.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V5e3
Treatment
severe drought at 75% and 50% FCe3
Outcome
MDA accumulatione3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
23.7% and 57.6%e3
Comparator
100% FCe3

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“In response to severe drought at 75% and 50% FC, V2 and V5 showed a decrease in MDA accumulation (by 34.2% and 50% in V2 and 23.7% and 57.6% in V5, respectively) compared to 100% FC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1320 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V1, V2 and V5 showed higher levels of spermine and free spermidine.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V1, V2 and V5e4
Outcome
levels of spermine and free spermidinee4
Direction
highere4

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e4

“V1, V2 and V5 showed higher levels of spermine and free spermidine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1599 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V3 and V4 were more sensitive to drought stress.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V3 and V4e5
Treatment
drought stresse5
Outcome
more sensitive to drought stresse5

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e5

“V3 and V4 were more sensitive to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyamines generally increased with decreasing field capacity.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Treatment
decreasing field capacitye6
Outcome
Polyaminese6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e6

“Polyamines generally showed an increase with decreasing field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 75% and 50% FC, glucose sugar content increased significantly by 85.7% to 133% in V1.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V1e7
Treatment
75% and 50% FCe7
Outcome
glucose sugar contente7
Direction
increasee7
Value
85.7% to 133%e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was a significant increase in glucose sugar content at 75% and 50% FC, which was 85.7% to 133% at V1, 19% to 76.9% at V2, and decreased by 30% and 53% at V4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 75% and 50% FC, glucose sugar content increased by 19% to 76.9% in V2.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V2e7
Treatment
75% and 50% FCe7
Outcome
glucose sugar contente7
Direction
increasee7
Value
19% to 76.9%e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was a significant increase in glucose sugar content at 75% and 50% FC, which was 85.7% to 133% at V1, 19% to 76.9% at V2, and decreased by 30% and 53% at V4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 75% and 50% FC, glucose sugar content decreased by 30% and 53% in V4.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
V4e7
Treatment
75% and 50% FCe7
Outcome
glucose sugar contente7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
30% and 53%e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was a significant increase in glucose sugar content at 75% and 50% FC, which was 85.7% to 133% at V1, 19% to 76.9% at V2, and decreased by 30% and 53% at V4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2083 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic osmolytes positively influenced enzymatic activity in drought-tolerant grafts.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Compound
Organic osmolytese3
Outcome
enzymatic activitye3

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“Organic osmolytes positively influenced the enzymatic activity in drought-tolerant grafts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey increased cell activity.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
Paulsen, R110 and Ramseye3
Outcome
cell activitye3
Direction
increasede3

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study found that the drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey increased cell activity, reduced ROS production, lowered MDA levels and increased antioxidant capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey reduced ROS production.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
Paulsen, R110 and Ramseye3
Outcome
ROS productione3
Direction
reducede3

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study found that the drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey increased cell activity, reduced ROS production, lowered MDA levels and increased antioxidant capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey lowered MDA levels.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
Paulsen, R110 and Ramseye3
Outcome
MDA levelse3
Direction
lowerede3

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study found that the drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey increased cell activity, reduced ROS production, lowered MDA levels and increased antioxidant capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey increased antioxidant capabilities.

Taxon
grafted grapevinee2
Material
Paulsen, R110 and Ramseye3
Outcome
antioxidant capabilitiese3
Direction
increasede3

Verbatim

e2

“five grafted grapevine combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study found that the drought-tolerant rootstocks Paulsen, R110 and Ramsey increased cell activity, reduced ROS production, lowered MDA levels and increased antioxidant capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1024 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: oxidative · VitisResults differ

12 papers: 3 positive, 9 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.