Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Assessment of Light Spectrum Effects on Lettuce Productivity under a Solar-integrated Hydroponic System

Shranoy Roy Chowdhury; D.K. Vyas; Sravankumar Jogunuri

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable agricultural practices has suggested the need for innovative approaches like solar-powered hydroponic systems integrated with LED lighting. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of different red and blue LED light combinations on qualitative and quantitative parameters of lettuce and to assess the performance of solar-powered hydroponic systems in controlled environments. This study focuses on optimising lettuce cultivation at College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Godhra, Gujarat, India, by examining the impact of varying red and blue LED light spectra on growth and nutritional quality from August 2024 to February 2025. Four treatments were compared: T1 (50% Red - 50% Blue LED), T2 (25% Red - 75% Blue LED), T3 (75% Red - 25% Blue LED), and a control group grown under natural daylight with controlled monitoring of environmental and nutrient parameters. The concentration of phenolic compounds, important antioxidants in lettuce, was influenced by the light treatments. The T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) resulted in the highest average phenol content of 0.68%. The concentration of total soluble sugars, contributing to the sweetness of lettuce, varied among the treatments. The T3 treatment (75% Red - 25% Blue LED) exhibited the highest average total soluble sugar content at 5.5%. Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) content, a crucial nutritional quality indicator, was significantly influenced by the LED treatments. The T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) resulted in the highest average ascorbic acid level at 15.4 mg/100g. The percentage of protein in the harvested lettuce varied significantly across the treatments. The T1 treatment (50% Red - 50% Blue LED) resulted in the highest average protein content of 44.12%, significantly higher than both T2 and T3 (both at 42.28%) and the control group (40.44%). Chlorophyll content, a proxy for photosynthetic capacity, was highest in the T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) with an average of 2.1 mg/g fresh weight. Anthocyanin content, contributing to both the color and antioxidant properties of lettuce, was highest in the T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) with an average of 0.82%. Possible outcomes include optimized lighting configurations for maximizing lettuce yield and nutritional quality, with reduced energy consumption. The findings could promote the widespread adoption of sustainable, energy-efficient hydroponic farming practices to address global food security challenges.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced the highest lettuce phenol content, 0.68%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
25% Red - 75% Blue LEDe0
Outcome
phenol contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) resulted in the highest average phenol content of 0.68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced the highest lettuce total soluble sugar content, 5.5%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
75% Red - 25% Blue LEDe0
Outcome
total soluble sugar contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T3 treatment (75% Red - 25% Blue LED) exhibited the highest average total soluble sugar content at 5.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LED treatments significantly influenced lettuce ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
LED treatmentse0
Outcome
Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) content, a crucial nutritional quality indicator, was significantly influenced by the LED treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 yielded the highest lettuce ascorbic acid level, 15.4 mg/100g.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
25% Red - 75% Blue LEDe0
Outcome
ascorbic acid levele0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.4 mg/100ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) resulted in the highest average ascorbic acid level at 15.4 mg/100g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein percentage differed significantly among lettuce light treatments.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of proteine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of protein in the harvested lettuce varied significantly across the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 yielded the highest lettuce protein content, 44.12%, significantly above T2, T3 and control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
50% Red - 50% Blue LEDe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
44.12%e0
Qualifier
both at 42.28%e0
Comparator
T2 and T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T1 treatment (50% Red - 50% Blue LED) resulted in the highest average protein content of 44.12%, significantly higher than both T2 and T3 (both at 42.28%) and the control group (40.44%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had the highest lettuce chlorophyll content, 2.1 mg/g fresh weight.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
25% Red - 75% Blue LEDe0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.1 mg/g fresh weighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content, a proxy for photosynthetic capacity, was highest in the T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) with an average of 2.1 mg/g fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–2051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had the highest lettuce anthocyanin content, 0.82%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
25% Red - 75% Blue LEDe0
Outcome
Anthocyanin contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin content, contributing to both the color and antioxidant properties of lettuce, was highest in the T2 treatment (25% Red - 75% Blue LED) with an average of 0.82%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2225 · show in text ↑

light · quality: protein · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 44 positive, 8 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

light · physiology: osmolytes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.