Paper · 2020 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Functional growth, photosynthesis and nutritional property analyses of lettuce grown under different temperature and light intensity

Zheng Chen; Mohammad Shah Jahan; Pengpeng Mao; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the impact of light intensity and temperature on vegetable growth and dietary quality characteristics. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), as one of the model vegetables in plant factories, was grown under two light levels (G1: 160 µmol m–2 s–1, G2: 200 µmol m–2 s–1) with different day/night temperatures (T1: 20 ± 1°C/15 ± 1°C, T2: 24 ± 1°C/19 ± 1°C) to investigate mutual effects of light intensity and temperature on its growth and quality properties. The results revealed that the T2G2 treatment showed higher plant height, biomass and net photosynthetic rate, while T1G2 resulted in decreased leaf area and lower maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) compared to T1G1. Simultaneous increases in light intensity and temperature based on T1G1 significantly increased the contents of anthocyanin, vitamin C (Vc) and soluble protein by 58%, 21% and 172%, respectively. The higher light intensity promoted the nutritional values of lettuce, characterised by lower nitrate level and soluble protein contents. Principal component analysis showed a negative collinearity between the nitrate content and soluble protein and Vc contents. In conclusion, light intensity and temperature co-regulated the lettuce’s growth and development, and their simultaneous increases better for growth and nutritional values of lettuce. These results provide a better understanding of the cultivation of plants in an artificial plant factory while maintaining yield and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2G2 gave higher plant height, biomass and net photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
T2G2 treatmente0
Outcome
plant height, biomass and net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“T2G2 treatment showed higher plant height, biomass and net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1G2 decreased leaf area relative to T1G1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
T1G2e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
T1G1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“T1G2 resulted in decreased leaf area and lower maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) compared to T1G1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1G2 lowered maximum photosystem II efficiency relative to T1G1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
T1G2e0
Outcome
maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
T1G1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“T1G2 resulted in decreased leaf area and lower maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) compared to T1G1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneously raising light and temperature increased anthocyanin by 58%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Simultaneous increases in light intensity and temperaturee0
Outcome
contents of anthocyanine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
58%e0
Comparator
T1G1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simultaneous increases in light intensity and temperature based on T1G1 significantly increased the contents of anthocyanin, vitamin C (Vc) and soluble protein by 58%, 21% and 172%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneously raising light and temperature increased vitamin C by 21%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Simultaneous increases in light intensity and temperaturee0
Outcome
vitamin C (Vc)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
T1G1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simultaneous increases in light intensity and temperature based on T1G1 significantly increased the contents of anthocyanin, vitamin C (Vc) and soluble protein by 58%, 21% and 172%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneously raising light and temperature increased soluble protein by 172%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Simultaneous increases in light intensity and temperaturee0
Outcome
soluble proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
172%e0
Comparator
T1G1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simultaneous increases in light intensity and temperature based on T1G1 significantly increased the contents of anthocyanin, vitamin C (Vc) and soluble protein by 58%, 21% and 172%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher light intensity lowered nitrate levels.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
higher light intensitye0
Outcome
nitrate levele0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher light intensity promoted the nutritional values of lettuce, characterised by lower nitrate level and soluble protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher light intensity lowered soluble protein contents.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
higher light intensitye0
Outcome
soluble protein contentse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher light intensity promoted the nutritional values of lettuce, characterised by lower nitrate level and soluble protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1052 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate content was negatively correlated with soluble protein and vitamin C contents.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Compound
soluble protein and Vc contentse0
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“negative collinearity between the nitrate content and soluble protein and Vc contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1177 · show in text ↑

light · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 40 positive, 9 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

light · physiology: osmolytes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.