Paper · 2025 · Plant Cell & Environment

A Positive Regulator CsPR10‐9 Confers Resistance to Anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) Is Negatively Regulated by CsMYB72 in Tea Plants

Yongning Tao; Pengke Wang; Yilin Gong; et al.

17
claims
43
verbatim quotes
10
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Anthracnose is a devastating fungal disease in tea plants caused by the pathogen Colletotrichum species. It severely affects tea yield and quality. Pathogenesis‐related (PR) genes play indispensable roles in plant resistance to fungal pathogens. Our transcriptome data showed that PR10 family genes are involved in the immune response to anthracnose infection in tea plants; however, the underlying regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we identified a PR10 family gene, CsPR10‐9 , which was highly induced by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infection and salicylic acid (SA)/methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments. Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9 substantially compromised the disease resistance of tea plants, and this was accompanied by reduced activities of the antioxidant enzymes, peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), resulting in elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, decreased SA content, and increased jasmonic acid (JA) content. Transient overexpression of CsPR10‐9 in tobacco leaves showed that the lesion area on CsPR10‐9‐overexpressing leaves was significantly smaller than the control leaves, accompanied by decreased H 2 O 2 level and increased POD and SOD activities. CsPR10‐9 was negatively regulated by an R2R3‐type MYB transcription factor, CsMYB72, which directly bound to MYB transcription factor binding site cis ‐acting elements in its promoter to inhibit the expression of CsPR10‐9 . CsMYB72 is localised in the nucleus and participate in the response to anthracnose infection and SA/MeJA treatment. Moreover, silencing of CsMYB72 significantly enhanced disease resistance, increased POD and SOD activities, reduced ROS levels, increased SA content, and decreased JA content. Taken together, our results revealed that the CsMYB72‐CsPR10‐9 module regulates the SA/JA‐mediated defence response of tea plants to anthracnose. This study provides new molecular targets and a theoretical foundation for breeding of disease‐resistant tea germplasms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea PR10 family genes were implicated in the immune response to anthracnose.

Taxon
tea plantse0t0
Gene
PR10 family genese0t0
Outcome
immune response to anthracnose infectione0t0

Verbatim

e0

“PR10 family genes are involved in the immune response to anthracnose infection in tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsPR10-9 was strongly induced by C. gloeosporioides infection and salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate treatments.

Taxon
teae0t0
Treatment
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infectione0t0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0t0pathogen
Gene
CsPR10‐9e0t0
Outcome
CsPR10‐9e0t0
Direction
highly inducede0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CsPR10‐9 , which was highly induced by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infection and salicylic acid (SA)/methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient CsPR10-9 silencing compromised tea disease resistance.

Taxon
tea plantse0t0
Treatment
Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9e0t0
Gene
CsPR10‐9e0t0
Outcome
disease resistancee0t0
Direction
compromisede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9 substantially compromised the disease resistance of tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsPR10-9 silencing reduced peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities.

Taxon
tea plantse0t0e1
Treatment
Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9e0t0e1
Gene
peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0t0e1
Outcome
activities of the antioxidant enzymese0t0e1
Direction
reducede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this was accompanied by reduced activities of the antioxidant enzymes, peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsPR10-9 silencing elevated reactive oxygen species levels.

Taxon
tea plantse0t0e1
Treatment
Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9e0t0e1
Outcome
reactive oxygen species (ROS) levelse0t0e1
Direction
elevatede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsPR10-9 silencing decreased salicylic acid content.

Taxon
tea plantse0t0e1
Treatment
Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9e0t0e1
Outcome
SA contente0t0e1
Direction
decreasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased SA content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsPR10-9 silencing increased jasmonic acid content.

Taxon
tea plantse0t0e1
Treatment
Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9e0t0e1
Outcome
jasmonic acid (JA) contente0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased jasmonic acid (JA) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transient silencing of CsPR10‐9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CsPR10-9 overexpression in tobacco reduced lesion area relative to control leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0t0
Treatment
Transient overexpression of CsPR10‐9e0t0
Gene
CsPR10‐9e0t0
Outcome
lesion areae0t0
Direction
smallere0t0
Comparator
control leavese0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transient overexpression of CsPR10‐9 in tobacco leaves showed that the lesion area on CsPR10‐9‐overexpressing leaves was significantly smaller than the control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsPR10-9 overexpression in tobacco decreased hydrogen peroxide and increased POD and SOD activities.

Treatment
Transient overexpression of CsPR10‐9e0t0e1
Outcome
H 2 O 2 levele0t0e1
Direction
decreasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“accompanied by decreased H 2 O 2 level and increased POD and SOD activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transient overexpression of CsPR10‐9 in tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1024 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsMYB72 directly bound cis elements in the CsPR10-9 promoter and inhibited CsPR10-9 expression.

Taxon
teae0t0
Gene
CsMYB72e0t0
Outcome
expression of CsPR10‐9e0t0
Direction
inhibite0t0
Qualifier
directly bound to MYB transcription factor binding site cis ‐acting elementse0t0

Verbatim

e0

“CsMYB72, which directly bound to MYB transcription factor binding site cis ‐acting elements in its promoter to inhibit the expression of CsPR10‐9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsMYB72 localizes to the nucleus and responds to anthracnose infection and SA/MeJA treatment.

Taxon
teae0t0
Treatment
anthracnose infection and SA/MeJA treatmente0t0
Gene
CsMYB72e0t0
Outcome
localised in the nucleuse0t0

Verbatim

e0

“CsMYB72 is localised in the nucleus and participate in the response to anthracnose infection and SA/MeJA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CsMYB72 silencing significantly enhanced tea disease resistance.

Taxon
teae0t0
Treatment
silencing of CsMYB72e0t0
Gene
CsMYB72e0t0
Outcome
disease resistancee0t0
Direction
enhancede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“silencing of CsMYB72 significantly enhanced disease resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsMYB72 silencing increased POD and SOD activities.

Taxon
teae0t0e1
Treatment
silencing of CsMYB72e0t0e1
Outcome
POD and SOD activitiese0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“silencing of CsMYB72 significantly enhanced disease resistance, increased POD and SOD activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“silencing of CsMYB72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsMYB72 silencing reduced ROS levels.

Taxon
teae0t0e1
Treatment
silencing of CsMYB72e0t0e1
Outcome
ROS levelse0t0e1
Direction
reducede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reduced ROS levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“silencing of CsMYB72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsMYB72 silencing increased SA content.

Taxon
teae0t0e1
Treatment
silencing of CsMYB72e0t0e1
Outcome
SA contente0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased SA content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“silencing of CsMYB72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsMYB72 silencing decreased JA content.

Taxon
teae0t0e1
Treatment
silencing of CsMYB72e0t0e1
Outcome
JA contente0t0e1
Direction
decreasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased JA content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“silencing of CsMYB72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1585 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CsMYB72–CsPR10-9 module regulates the SA/JA-mediated defense response to tea anthracnose.

Taxon
tea plantse0t0
Gene
CsMYB72‐CsPR10‐9e0t0
Outcome
defence responsee0t0
Qualifier
SA/JA‐mediatede0t0

Verbatim

e0

“CsMYB72‐CsPR10‐9 module regulates the SA/JA‐mediated defence response of tea plants to anthracnose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–145 · show in text ↑

loss of function · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

loss of function · physiology: hormones · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

loss of function · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

loss of function · physiology: oxidative · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.