Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Impact of biochar and deficit irrigation on greenhouse gas emissions reduction in maize-wheat rotation systems

Tianyu Wang; Xin Cong; Jing Yu; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Biochar application and irrigation management are widely regarded as effective strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural systems. However, the combined effects of these two approaches on greenhouse gas emissions remain insufficiently understood. This study investigated how different biochar application rates and irrigation strategies affect soil moisture and temperature, as well as the relationship between soil moisture, temperature, and greenhouse gas emissions. A two-year field experiment was conducted in the North China Plain to investigate the combined impact of deficit irrigation and biochar on greenhouse gas emissions in a summer maize–winter wheat rotation system. The experiment included three irrigation strategies (full irrigation (F: 70 %-80 % field capacity ( θ fc )), deficit irrigation (D: 50 %-60 % θ fc ) during the jointing stage of maize and wheat (D J ), and deficit irrigation during the jointing stage and filling stage of maize and wheat (D J+F )) and 3 biochar application rates (T: 0 t ha −1 biochar, M: 15 t ha −1 biochar, and H: 30 t ha −1 biochar). The results showed that water-filled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature were positively correlated with CO 2 and N 2 O emission fluxes but had no significant relationship with CH 4 emission flux. Decreasing irrigation and increasing biochar application led to a reduction in cumulative soil CO 2 and N 2 O emissions, alongside an increase in CH 4 absorption. The interaction between deficit irrigation and biochar application effectively reduced overall soil greenhouse gas emissions. Under high biochar application (H), deficit irrigation during the jointing stage of maize and wheat decreased the global warming potential by 15.9 %, with a minimal yield loss of only 4.86 %. These findings suggest that targeted deficit irrigation, combined with biochar application, is a promising strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while minimizing crop yield losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil WFPS and temperature were positively correlated with CO2 and N2O emission fluxes.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Outcome
CO 2 and N 2 O emission fluxese0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Setting
soil temperaturee0

Verbatim

e0

“water-filled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature were positively correlated with CO 2 and N 2 O emission fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil WFPS and temperature had no significant association with CH4 emission flux.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Outcome
CH 4 emission fluxe0
Direction
no significant relationshipe0
Setting
soil temperaturee0

Verbatim

e0

“water-filled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature were positively correlated with CO 2 and N 2 O emission fluxes but had no significant relationship with CH 4 emission flux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and more biochar lowered cumulative soil CO2 and N2O emissions.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
Decreasing irrigation and increasing biochar applicatione0
Outcome
cumulative soil CO 2 and N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing irrigation and increasing biochar application led to a reduction in cumulative soil CO 2 and N 2 O emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and more biochar increased soil CH4 absorption.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
Decreasing irrigation and increasing biochar applicatione0
Outcome
CH 4 absorptione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing irrigation and increasing biochar application led to a reduction in cumulative soil CO 2 and N 2 O emissions, alongside an increase in CH 4 absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation combined with biochar reduced overall soil greenhouse gas emissions.

Taxon
maize-wheatt0
Treatment
deficit irrigation and biochar applicatione0
Outcome
overall soil greenhouse gas emissionse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between deficit irrigation and biochar application effectively reduced overall soil greenhouse gas emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1598 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize-wheat rotation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With high biochar, jointing-stage deficit irrigation lowered global warming potential by 15.9%.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigation during the jointing stage of maize and wheate0
Outcome
global warming potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.9 %e0
Qualifier
high biochar application (H)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under high biochar application (H), deficit irrigation during the jointing stage of maize and wheat decreased the global warming potential by 15.9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With high biochar, jointing-stage deficit irrigation caused a 4.86% yield loss.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigation during the jointing stage of maize and wheate0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
4.86 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation during the jointing stage of maize and wheat decreased the global warming potential by 15.9 %, with a minimal yield loss of only 4.86 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1790 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 791 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.