Abstract
A study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the CERES-Maize model in the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) to simulate sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata) yield and nitrogen leaching in Florida, considering input parameter uncertainties. In this type of biological system modeling, uncertainties in predictions with respect to input parameter uncertainty are often not reported. Thus, the result of model verification could be misleading if there are large uncertainties in field observations, since single model prediction values cannot comprehensively represent heterogeneous field conditions. Instead, comparisons between the distributions of model simulations and field observations were recommended in this study. A two-factor split-plot field experiment was conducted with three nitrogen fertilizer levels (185, 247, and 309 kg N ha-1) and two irrigation levels (I1 and I2; I2 = 1.5 I1, where I1 is the irrigation demand calculated based on a daily soil water balance). Yield response to different nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation management levels was evaluated, and the cumulative nitrogen leaching was estimated for each of the treatments based on a nitrogen balance. Next, the field experiment treatments were simulated with the calibrated CERES-Maize model using parameter sets generated from parameter distributions derived with the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method in a previous study. Simulated dry matter yields and cumulative nitrogen leaching were compared to field-measured or estimated values. Measured total and marketable yields were not affected by irrigation level. Estimated nitrogen leaching increased significantly with higher levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer application. The calibrated CERES-Maize model accurately predicted the phenology dates, with an error of 0 and 1 day for anthesis and maturity dates, respectively. The prediction uncertainties (due to uncertain input parameter values), as measured by the standard deviation (SD) in predicted anthesis and maturity dates, were only 1 and 2 days after planting, respectively. The model also accurately predicted the changes in dry matter yield caused by different nitrogen and irrigation levels, with a relative absolute error (RAE) less than 12% for all but one treatment. Due to the uncertainties in soil and genetic parameters, the prediction SD of simulated dry yields ranged from 655 kg ha-1 at I1 to 960 kg ha-1 at I2, while the observation SD ranged from 220 to 463 kg ha-1 for measured dry yields. The uncertainties in simulated dry yield were higher than the uncertainties of measured values due to relatively high variations in estimated genetic coefficients. The model performance could be improved further if the variations in estimated genetic coefficients could be reduced. The difference between the simulated and estimated nitrogen leaching amounts was significant and complex, ranging from -31 to 43 kg N ha-1 with an average absolute difference of 15.3%. This discrepancy was probably due to both the errors in estimation of potential nitrogen leaching in the field experiment using a mass balance approach and the inaccuracy of model predictions. Nevertheless, the increase in nitrogen leaching resulting from higher nitrogen fertilizer levels was correctly predicted. The uncertainties in simulated N leaching covered more than 67% of the uncertainties of estimated leaching for all but one treatment, indicating that estimated soil parameters via the GLUE method were able to represent the heterogeneity of field soil. In general, the CERES-Maize model is able to simulate sweet corn production under different management conditions sufficiently to allow exploration of tradeoffs between crop yield and nitrogen leaching for sweet corn production in Florida.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation level did not affect measured total and marketable yields.
- Taxon
- sweet cornt0
- Treatment
- irrigation levele0
- Outcome
- total and marketable yieldse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Measured total and marketable yields were not affected by irrigation level.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Estimated nitrogen leaching increased with higher irrigation.
- Taxon
- sweet cornt0
- Treatment
- higher levels of irrigatione0
- Outcome
- nitrogen leachinge0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Estimated nitrogen leaching increased significantly with higher levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer application.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Estimated nitrogen leaching increased with higher nitrogen fertilizer application.
- Taxon
- sweet cornt0
- Treatment
- higher levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer applicatione0
- Outcome
- nitrogen leachinge0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Estimated nitrogen leaching increased significantly with higher levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer application.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
CERES-Maize predicted anthesis date with zero day error.
Verbatim
e0“The calibrated CERES-Maize model accurately predicted the phenology dates, with an error of 0 and 1 day for anthesis and maturity dates, respectively.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
CERES-Maize predicted maturity date with one day error.
Verbatim
e0“The calibrated CERES-Maize model accurately predicted the phenology dates, with an error of 0 and 1 day for anthesis and maturity dates, respectively.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Prediction standard deviations were one day for anthesis and two days for maturity.
Verbatim
e0“The prediction uncertainties (due to uncertain input parameter values), as measured by the standard deviation (SD) in predicted anthesis and maturity dates, were only 1 and 2 days after planting, respectively.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Predicted dry matter yield changes had relative absolute error below 12% except for one treatment.
Verbatim
e0“The model also accurately predicted the changes in dry matter yield caused by different nitrogen and irrigation levels, with a relative absolute error (RAE) less than 12% for all but one treatment.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated dry yield prediction SD ranged from 655 to 960 kg ha-1 across irrigation levels.
Verbatim
e0“the prediction SD of simulated dry yields ranged from 655 kg ha-1 at I1 to 960 kg ha-1 at I2”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Observed dry yield SD ranged from 220 to 463 kg ha-1.
Verbatim
e0“the observation SD ranged from 220 to 463 kg ha-1 for measured dry yields.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated dry yield uncertainty exceeded measured uncertainty, attributed to variation in estimated genetic coefficients.
Verbatim
e0“The uncertainties in simulated dry yield were higher than the uncertainties of measured values due to relatively high variations in estimated genetic coefficients.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated versus estimated nitrogen leaching differed by -31 to 43 kg N ha-1, averaging 15.3% absolute difference.
Verbatim
e0“The difference between the simulated and estimated nitrogen leaching amounts was significant and complex, ranging from -31 to 43 kg N ha-1 with an average absolute difference of 15.3%.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
The model predicted increased nitrogen leaching with higher nitrogen fertilizer levels.
- Taxon
- sweet cornt0
- Treatment
- higher nitrogen fertilizer levelse0
- Outcome
- nitrogen leachinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“the increase in nitrogen leaching resulting from higher nitrogen fertilizer levels was correctly predicted.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated nitrogen leaching uncertainty covered over 67% of estimated uncertainty except for one treatment.
Verbatim
e0“The uncertainties in simulated N leaching covered more than 67% of the uncertainties of estimated leaching for all but one treatment”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended comparing distributions of model simulations and field observations.
Verbatim
e0“comparisons between the distributions of model simulations and field observations were recommended in this study.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Reducing variation in estimated genetic coefficients could improve model performance.
Verbatim
e0“The model performance could be improved further if the variations in estimated genetic coefficients could be reduced.”
t0“Sweet Corn”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: postharvest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
irrigation · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →fertilization · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.