Paper · 2025 · Advanced Science

Development and Breeding of Herbicide‐Resistant Sorghum for Effective Cereal‐Legume Intercropping

Sanyuan Tang; Jiayang Shi; Xuefeng Li; et al.

12
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weeds bring a serious challenge to crop production, and herbicides is the most effective and economic way to manage it in field. Sorghum is a critical crop for staple food, fodder, and biofuel. However, the lack of herbicide-resistant sorghum germplasm severely impedes its production. Here, we conducted a large-scale screening and identified 13 sorghum mutant lines resistant to imidazolinone (IMI) herbicides. Two unique mutation sites in SbALS (acetolactate synthase), thus namely Sbals-1 (A93T) and Sbals-2 (S624N) are discovered, both enhance sorghum tolerance to imazamox. Notably, under high concentrations of imazamox, sbals-1 presented a superior growth phenotype and elevated SbALS activity than sbals-2, a difference that can be attributed to the predicted protein structures. Breeding with Sbals, both grain- and grass-type sorghum, shows great weed control and field performance. The herbicide imazamox resistance is further evaluated in a soybean population for sorghum-soybean strip intercropping, identifying 123 highly resistant soybean varieties. Field intercropping tests indicated health growth of both soybean and sorghum lines post-imazamox treatment, which enhance field clearance of weed. This study, therefore, provides valuable insights not only for herbicide-resistant sorghum breeding but also for the successful implementation of efficient and sustainable cereal-legume intercropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screening identified 13 sorghum mutant lines resistant to IMI herbicides.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
mutant lines resistant to imidazolinone (IMI) herbicidese0
Value
13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identified 13 sorghum mutant lines resistant to imidazolinone (IMI) herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–412 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sbals-1 A93T enhanced sorghum tolerance to imazamox.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Gene
Sbals-1 (A93T)e0
Outcome
sorghum tolerance to imazamoxe0
Direction
enhancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two unique mutation sites in SbALS (acetolactate synthase), thus namely Sbals-1 (A93T) and Sbals-2 (S624N) are discovered, both enhance sorghum tolerance to imazamox.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sbals-2 S624N enhanced sorghum tolerance to imazamox.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Gene
Sbals-2 (S624N)e0
Outcome
sorghum tolerance to imazamoxe0
Direction
enhancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two unique mutation sites in SbALS (acetolactate synthase), thus namely Sbals-1 (A93T) and Sbals-2 (S624N) are discovered, both enhance sorghum tolerance to imazamox.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high imazamox, sbals-1 showed superior growth to sbals-2.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Material
sbals-1e0
Treatment
high concentrations of imazamoxe0
Outcome
growth phenotypee0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
sbals-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under high concentrations of imazamox, sbals-1 presented a superior growth phenotype and elevated SbALS activity than sbals-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–714 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high imazamox, sbals-1 had elevated SbALS activity relative to sbals-2.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Material
sbals-1e0
Gene
SbALSe0
Outcome
SbALS activitye0
Direction
elevatede0
Comparator
sbals-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under high concentrations of imazamox, sbals-1 presented a superior growth phenotype and elevated SbALS activity than sbals-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–714 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–566 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted protein structures were offered as the explanation for the sbals-1 and sbals-2 difference.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Gene
SbALSe1
Outcome
a differencee0
Qualifier
predicted protein structurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a difference that can be attributed to the predicted protein structures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“sbals-1 presented a superior growth phenotype and elevated SbALS activity than sbals-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–714 · show in text ↑
e2

“sorghum tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breeding with Sbals in grain-type sorghum showed strong weed control and field performance.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
grain-e0
Gene
Sbalse0
Outcome
great weed control and field performancee0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Breeding with Sbals, both grain- and grass-type sorghum, shows great weed control and field performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–893 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breeding with Sbals in grass-type sorghum showed strong weed control and field performance.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
grass-typee0
Gene
Sbalse0
Outcome
great weed control and field performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Breeding with Sbals, both grain- and grass-type sorghum, shows great weed control and field performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–893 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screening identified 123 highly imazamox-resistant soybean varieties.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
highly resistant soybean varietiese0
Value
123e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide imazamox resistance is further evaluated in a soybean population for sorghum-soybean strip intercropping, identifying 123 highly resistant soybean varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum lines grew healthily after imazamox treatment in field intercropping.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
imazamox treatmente0
Outcome
health growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field intercropping tests indicated health growth of both soybean and sorghum lines post-imazamox treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean lines grew healthily after imazamox treatment in field intercropping.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
imazamox treatmente0
Outcome
health growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field intercropping tests indicated health growth of both soybean and sorghum lines post-imazamox treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping after imazamox enhanced weed clearance.

Taxon
soybean and sorghumGlycine maxSorghume0
Treatment
imazamox treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
field clearance of weede0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field intercropping tests indicated health growth of both soybean and sorghum lines post-imazamox treatment, which enhance field clearance of weed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1213 · show in text ↑

imazamox · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imazamox · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

imazamox · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

imazamox · weed · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.