Paper · 2023 · ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA

Differences of physiological responses and transcriptional regulation of alfalfa with different drought tolerances under drought stresses

Li CHEN; Jing WANG; Xiao QIU; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Alfalfa is the most important legume forage, which is often planted in aird or semi-arid regions. The objective of this study is to explore the responsive mechanism of alfalfa with different drought tolerance to drought stress, which provides the theoretical basis for tolerant breeding of alfalfa. In this study, the new variety Medicago sativa ‘Zhongke 1’ was used as the test material, and M. sativa ‘Sanditi’ was used as the control. The effects of drought stress on growth traits, photosynthesis, chlorophyll concentration, leaf water content, osmotic adjustment substances, and antioxidant enzyme activities were determined by natural drought strategy in pots. The deferentially expressed genes were compared by transcriptome analysis. Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa. Compared with Sanditi, Zhongke 1 revealed the lower malondialdehyde concentration and electrical conductivity under drought stress, but stronger osmotic regulation ability and superoxide radical scavenging ability. Transcriptome sequencing identified 5308 and 8053 drought-responsive genes of Zhongke 1 and Sanditi, respectively. GO functional annotation demonstrated that 346 drought-responsive genes were significantly enriched in six GO item categories in Zhongke 1, while 1683 drought-responsive genes in Sanditi were significantly enriched in 29 GO item categories. The relative expression levels of 19 key drought-tolerant genes in Zhongke 1 were significantly higher than those in Sanditi. Alfalfa may maintain a relatively high photosynthetic rate by up-regulating the relative expression levels of drought tolerant genes SUS, P5CS, LEA, SOD, POD, PEPC, and NCED, thus improving osmotic regulation ability and antioxidant enzyme activity. The results provide a theoretical basis for further exploration of alfalfa’s candidate genes in response to drought stress and drought tolerant breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced plant height in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced biomass in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced relative water content of leaves in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
relative water content of leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced photosynthetic rate in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced transpiration rate in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced stomatal conductance in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced intercellular carbon dioxide in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
intercellular carbon dioxidee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced chlorophyll concentration in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced plant height, biomass, relative water content of leaves, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide and chlorophyll concentration of alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, Zhongke 1 had lower malondialdehyde concentration than Sanditi.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Zhongke 1e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
malondialdehyde concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Sanditie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Sanditi, Zhongke 1 revealed the lower malondialdehyde concentration and electrical conductivity under drought stress, but stronger osmotic regulation ability and superoxide radical scavenging ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, Zhongke 1 had lower electrical conductivity than Sanditi.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Zhongke 1e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
electrical conductivitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Sanditie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Sanditi, Zhongke 1 revealed the lower malondialdehyde concentration and electrical conductivity under drought stress, but stronger osmotic regulation ability and superoxide radical scavenging ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, Zhongke 1 had stronger osmotic regulation ability than Sanditi.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Zhongke 1e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
osmotic regulation abilitye0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
Sanditie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Sanditi, Zhongke 1 revealed the lower malondialdehyde concentration and electrical conductivity under drought stress, but stronger osmotic regulation ability and superoxide radical scavenging ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, Zhongke 1 had stronger superoxide radical scavenging ability than Sanditi.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Zhongke 1e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
superoxide radical scavenging abilitye0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
Sanditie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Sanditi, Zhongke 1 revealed the lower malondialdehyde concentration and electrical conductivity under drought stress, but stronger osmotic regulation ability and superoxide radical scavenging ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptome sequencing identified 5308 drought-responsive genes in Zhongke 1.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Zhongke 1e0
Outcome
drought-responsive genese0
Value
5308e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Transcriptome sequencing identified 5308 and 8053 drought-responsive genes of Zhongke 1 and Sanditi, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptome sequencing identified 8053 drought-responsive genes in Sanditi.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Sanditie0
Outcome
drought-responsive genese0
Value
8053e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Transcriptome sequencing identified 5308 and 8053 drought-responsive genes of Zhongke 1 and Sanditi, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Zhongke 1, 346 drought-responsive genes were significantly enriched in six GO item categories.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Zhongke 1e0
Outcome
drought-responsive genese0
Value
346e0
Qualifier
six GO item categoriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“GO functional annotation demonstrated that 346 drought-responsive genes were significantly enriched in six GO item categories in Zhongke 1, while 1683 drought-responsive genes in Sanditi were significantly enriched in 29 GO item categories.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Sanditi, 1683 drought-responsive genes were significantly enriched in 29 GO item categories.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Sanditie0
Outcome
drought-responsive genese0
Value
1683e0
Qualifier
29 GO item categoriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“GO functional annotation demonstrated that 346 drought-responsive genes were significantly enriched in six GO item categories in Zhongke 1, while 1683 drought-responsive genes in Sanditi were significantly enriched in 29 GO item categories.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Expression of 19 key drought-tolerant genes was significantly higher in Zhongke 1 than Sanditi.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Zhongke 1e0
Outcome
relative expression levels of 19 key drought-tolerant genese0
Direction
highere0
Value
19e0
Comparator
Sanditie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The relative expression levels of 19 key drought-tolerant genes in Zhongke 1 were significantly higher than those in Sanditi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1666 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa may maintain a high photosynthetic rate by up-regulating drought-tolerant genes.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Gene
SUS, P5CS, LEA, SOD, POD, PEPC, and NCEDe0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Alfalfa may maintain a relatively high photosynthetic rate by up-regulating the relative expression levels of drought tolerant genes SUS, P5CS, LEA, SOD, POD, PEPC, and NCED, thus improving osmotic regulation ability and antioxidant enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1916 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up-regulation of drought-tolerant genes may improve osmotic regulation ability and antioxidant enzyme activity in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Gene
SUS, P5CS, LEA, SOD, POD, PEPC, and NCEDe0
Outcome
osmotic regulation ability and antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
improvinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Alfalfa may maintain a relatively high photosynthetic rate by up-regulating the relative expression levels of drought tolerant genes SUS, P5CS, LEA, SOD, POD, PEPC, and NCED, thus improving osmotic regulation ability and antioxidant enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1916 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: oxidative · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

16 papers: 4 positive, 12 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

72 papers: 20 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

drought · soil: chemistry · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 3 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 9 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.