Paper · 2015 · Arid Land Research and Management

Effects of water deficit on growth, nodulation and physiological and biochemical processes inMedicago sativa-rhizobia symbiotic association

Mohammed Mouradi; Mohamed Farissi; Abdelaziz Bouizgaren; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
48
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of water deficit on growth, nodulation, and several physiological and biochemical processes in six symbiotic combinations involving three Moroccan alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations (Tafilalet1, Adis-Tata and Demnate2), an American Moapa variety and two rhizobial strains (RhL9 and RhL10) were studied. The experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions. Seedlings were separately inoculated with the suspension of two rhizobial strains and grown under two irrigation regimes: 80% of field capacity (optimal irrigation) and 40% of field capacity (water deficit). The water stress was applied for five weeks and the agro-physiological and biochemical parameters related to water deficit tolerance were assessed. The results showed that the water deficit had significantly reduced the height of the plants, the dry biomass and nodulation. This constraint also negatively affected the relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductance, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, the time to reach maximum fluorescence, the total chlorophyll content and the total nitrogen content. Comparison among the tested symbiotic combinations showed that their behaviors were significantly different. Under drought, oasis populations Ad and Ta maintained high PS II efficiency, membrane stability, relative water content, chlorophyll and nitrogen content in comparison to the mountain one Dm2 and the American Moapa variety. These parameters were maintained at adequate levels in the plants inoculated with the rhizobial strain RhL9 that showed a tolerance to water deficit conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly reduced plant height and dry biomass.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae1
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
height of the plants, the dry biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the water deficit had significantly reduced the height of the plants, the dry biomass and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly reduced nodulation.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae1
Treatment
water deficite0
Interactor
rhizobial strainse2symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the water deficit had significantly reduced the height of the plants, the dry biomass and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“two rhizobial strains (RhL9 and RhL10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit negatively affected leaf relative water content, membrane permeability and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae2
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductancee0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This constraint also negatively affected the relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–991 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water deficit had significantly reduced the height of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–827 · show in text ↑
e2

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit negatively affected maximum photosystem II quantum yield and time to maximum fluorescence.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae2
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, the time to reach maximum fluorescencee0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This constraint also negatively affected the relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductance, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, the time to reach maximum fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water deficit had significantly reduced the height of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–827 · show in text ↑
e2

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit negatively affected total chlorophyll and nitrogen contents.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae2
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and the total nitrogen contente0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This constraint also negatively affected the relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductance, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, the time to reach maximum fluorescence, the total chlorophyll content and the total nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water deficit had significantly reduced the height of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–827 · show in text ↑
e2

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested alfalfa–rhizobia combinations behaved significantly differently.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae1
Interactor
rhizobial strainse2symbiont
Outcome
behaviorse0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison among the tested symbiotic combinations showed that their behaviors were significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“two rhizobial strains (RhL9 and RhL10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–306 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, oasis populations Ad and Ta maintained higher PS II efficiency, membrane stability and relative water content than Dm2 and Moapa.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae1
Material
Ad and Tae0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
PS II efficiency, membrane stability, relative water contente0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
Dm2 and the American Moapa varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought, oasis populations Ad and Ta maintained high PS II efficiency, membrane stability, relative water content, chlorophyll and nitrogen content in comparison to the mountain one Dm2 and the American Moapa variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1471 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, oasis populations Ad and Ta maintained higher chlorophyll and nitrogen content than Dm2 and Moapa.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae1
Material
Ad and Tae0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
chlorophyll and nitrogen contente0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
Dm2 and the American Moapa varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought, oasis populations Ad and Ta maintained high PS II efficiency, membrane stability, relative water content, chlorophyll and nitrogen content in comparison to the mountain one Dm2 and the American Moapa variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1471 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants inoculated with RhL9 maintained adequate drought-related physiological parameters.

Taxon
Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativae1
Treatment
inoculated with the rhizobial strain RhL9e0
Interactor
RhL9e0symbiont
Outcome
These parameters were maintained at adequate levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These parameters were maintained at adequate levels in the plants inoculated with the rhizobial strain RhL9 that showed a tolerance to water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1632 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–199 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

72 papers: 20 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 3 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

11 papers: 0 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.