Paper · 2025 · Redia

BIOFUMIGATION WITH WINTER BRASSICA SPECIES SUPPRESSES THE ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE AND INCREASES THE TOMATO YIELD

GÖKHAN AYDINLI; SEVİLHAN MENNAN

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKN) are responsible for significant crop losses in vegetables worldwide and are ex- tremely difficult to control. Biofumigation is one of the most important alternatives that can be used to manage RKN. This study aimed to investigate the effects of biofumigation of winter brassica species on RKN and the yield of tomatoes. Six different brassicas and nematode-susceptible spinach plants as control from winter crops were used in trials in 2 greenhouses heavily infested with Meloidogyne arenaria. After Brassica species were grown until the flowering period, they were mixed into the soil and covered with polyethylene plastic film. At the end of one month, the gall index, female, and total nematode populations in the roots were determined, and nematode-susceptible tomato seedlings were planted in all plots. Each plot’s RKN population in the soil was counted monthly. At the tomato harvest, the growth parameters of the plants were determined, the tomato roots were evaluated using a 0-5 gal index, and the tomato yield was recorded. The soil’s RKN population was lower in arugula, redhead (RHR), and whitehead radish (WHR) cultivated plots than in the others. The gall indexes of tomatoes after growing RHR and WHR were 2.25 and 2.50 for arugula but 4.80 for spinach. Tomato yield in the plots where RHR, turnip, and WHR were grown previously increased by 249%, 200%, and 174%, respectively. Brassica species positively impact tomato plant growth and yield and can suggest biofumigation with arugula, RHR, and WHR for root-knot nematode-infected areas. Key Words: Root-knot nematodes; Brassica spp.; biofumigation; tomato yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arugula plots had lower soil root-knot nematode populations.

Treatment
arugulae0
Interactor
ROOT-KNOT NEMATODEMeloidogynet0pest
Outcome
soil’s RKN populatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil’s RKN population was lower in arugula, redhead (RHR), and whitehead radish (WHR) cultivated plots than in the others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE AND INCREASES THE TOMATO YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redhead radish plots had lower soil root-knot nematode populations.

Treatment
redhead (RHR)e0
Interactor
ROOT-KNOT NEMATODEMeloidogynet0pest
Outcome
soil’s RKN populatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil’s RKN population was lower in arugula, redhead (RHR), and whitehead radish (WHR) cultivated plots than in the others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE AND INCREASES THE TOMATO YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitehead radish plots had lower soil root-knot nematode populations.

Treatment
whitehead radish (WHR)e0
Interactor
ROOT-KNOT NEMATODEMeloidogynet0pest
Outcome
soil’s RKN populatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil’s RKN population was lower in arugula, redhead (RHR), and whitehead radish (WHR) cultivated plots than in the others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE AND INCREASES THE TOMATO YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato gall index after redhead radish was 2.25, versus 4.80 after spinach.

Treatment
RHRe0
Outcome
gall indexes of tomatoese0
Value
2.25e0
Qualifier
4.80e0
Comparator
spinache0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gall indexes of tomatoes after growing RHR and WHR were 2.25 and 2.50 for arugula but 4.80 for spinach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato gall index after whitehead radish was 2.50, versus 4.80 after spinach.

Treatment
WHRe0
Outcome
gall indexes of tomatoese0
Value
2.50e0
Qualifier
4.80e0
Comparator
spinache0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gall indexes of tomatoes after growing RHR and WHR were 2.25 and 2.50 for arugula but 4.80 for spinach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield rose 249% after redhead radish.

Treatment
RHRe0
Outcome
Tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
249%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato yield in the plots where RHR, turnip, and WHR were grown previously increased by 249%, 200%, and 174%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield rose 200% after turnip.

Treatment
turnipe0
Outcome
Tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
200%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato yield in the plots where RHR, turnip, and WHR were grown previously increased by 249%, 200%, and 174%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield rose 174% after whitehead radish.

Treatment
WHRe0
Outcome
Tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
174%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato yield in the plots where RHR, turnip, and WHR were grown previously increased by 249%, 200%, and 174%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica species were said to improve tomato growth.

Treatment
Brassica speciese0
Outcome
tomato plant growthe0
Direction
positively impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica species positively impact tomato plant growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend biofumigation with arugula, redhead and whitehead radish in root-knot nematode areas.

Outcome
biofumigation with arugula, RHR, and WHRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“can suggest biofumigation with arugula, RHR, and WHR for root-knot nematode-infected areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Brassica · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Raphanus sativus · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Raphanus sativus · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Raphanus sativus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.