Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Developmental Stages of Bell Pepper Influence the Response to Far-Red Light Supplements in a Controlled Environment

Awa Marina Mouliom-Ntapnze; Georges Yannick Fangue-Yapseu; Tagnon D. Missihoun

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Far-red (FR) additions to white or red/blue light resulted in improved dry biomass and fruit nutritional quality. Despite these positive effects, FR supplementation was also found to induce the abortion of flowers and fruits. We hypothesized that the timing and duration of the FR supplements determine the positive or negative effects of the FR supplement on the plant. To examine this hypothesis, we compared the effect of a gradient of FR supplements (5.5, 12, and 18.1 μmol m−2 s−1) on bell pepper plants (Capsicum annuum cv. Margrethe) when they were exposed to the FR supplements at the beginning of their vegetative growth phase to when FR supplementation only began at the generative phase. We found that 12 and 18.1 μmol m−2 s−1 of FR supplements resulted in a higher yield than 5.5 μmol m−2 s−1 of FR supplements, but FR supplementation from the onset of flowering delayed fruit ripening by 5–8 days and decreased fruit yield compared to FR supplementation that began at seedling transplantation. These results indicate that the positive effect of the FR supplements on the pepper plants of the cultivar Margrethe depends on the plant’s stages of development, and a much lower FR intensity may suffice to enhance growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red additions to white or red/blue light improved dry biomass and fruit nutritional quality of bell pepper.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
Far-red (FR) additionse1
Outcome
dry biomass and fruit nutritional qualitye1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
white or red/blue lighte1

Verbatim

e1

“Far-red (FR) additions to white or red/blue light resulted in improved dry biomass and fruit nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developmental Stages of Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red supplementation induced abortion of flowers and fruits in bell pepper.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
FR supplementatione2
Outcome
abortion of flowers and fruitse2
Direction
inducee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“FR supplementation was also found to induce the abortion of flowers and fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developmental Stages of Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red supplement at 12 and 18.1 μmol m−2 s−1 gave a higher bell pepper yield than 5.5 μmol m−2 s−1.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
12 and 18.1 μmol m−2 s−1 of FR supplementse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
5.5 μmol m−2 s−1 of FR supplementse3

Verbatim

e3

“12 and 18.1 μmol m−2 s−1 of FR supplements resulted in a higher yield than 5.5 μmol m−2 s−1 of FR supplements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developmental Stages of Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red supplementation from the onset of flowering delayed fruit ripening by 5-8 days compared with supplementation from seedling transplantation.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
FR supplementation from the onset of floweringe4
Outcome
fruit ripeninge4
Direction
delayede4
Value
5–8 dayse4
Comparator
FR supplementation that began at seedling transplantatione4

Verbatim

e4

“FR supplementation from the onset of flowering delayed fruit ripening by 5–8 days and decreased fruit yield compared to FR supplementation that began at seedling transplantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developmental Stages of Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red supplementation from the onset of flowering decreased bell pepper fruit yield compared with supplementation from seedling transplantation.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
FR supplementation from the onset of floweringe4
Outcome
fruit yielde4
Direction
decreasede4
Comparator
FR supplementation that began at seedling transplantatione4

Verbatim

e4

“FR supplementation from the onset of flowering delayed fruit ripening by 5–8 days and decreased fruit yield compared to FR supplementation that began at seedling transplantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developmental Stages of Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive effect of far-red supplements on the Margrethe pepper plants depends on developmental stage.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume6
Material
Margrethee5
Organ / stage
stages of developmente5
Treatment
FR supplementse5
Outcome
positive effect of the FR supplementse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the positive effect of the FR supplements on the pepper plants of the cultivar Margrethe depends on the plant’s stages of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1168 · show in text ↑
e6

“bell pepper plants (Capsicum annuum cv. Margrethe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–540 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A much lower far-red intensity may suffice to enhance bell pepper growth and yield.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume6
Outcome
enhance growth and yielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“bell pepper plants (Capsicum annuum cv. Margrethe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–540 · show in text ↑
e7

“a much lower FR intensity may suffice to enhance growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1239 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ

22 papers: 15 positive, 7 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

light · phenology · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

stage · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

light · quality: grain · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.