Abstract

Drought, one of the abiotic stress factors that threatens world food security, destructively limits the growth and development of agricultural plants. Therefore, determining drought-resistant cultivars is of vital importance against increasing climate change. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most important economic agricultural plants grown worldwide. In this study, different drought stress tolerances (10% PEG (Polyethylene Glycol 6000) and water scarcity) were applied to four commercial tomato cultivars (Rio Grande, Falcon, H−2274, Tyfrane F1) and the effects of drought stress were evaluated within the scope of physiological (germination percentage, shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight, total chlorophyll content, relative water content) and biochemical (protein amount, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase activity (POX), catalase activity (CAT), hydrogen peroxide content (H2O2) and lipid peroxidation activity (TBARs)) parameters. According to the research results, it was determined that drought stress leads to decreased root–shoot lengths, chlorophyll content, relative water content, fresh and dry weights, and antioxidant enzyme activities in Falcon and H−2274 cultures, increasing TBARs and H2O2 amounts. While the relative water content, which is an indicator of drought stress, shows the water status of the plant, antioxidant enzyme systems are evidence of the resilience of the defense mechanisms of the cultures. In this context, the Falcon cultivar had significantly reduced shoot length (21%, 37%), relative water content (20%, 30%), chlorophyll content (7%, 23%), fresh weight (51%, 49%) and dry weight (9%, 29%) under PEG and water scarcity application; in contrast to these reductions, TBARs (2%, 14%) and H2O2 content (3%, 15%) were significantly increased compared to the control, proving that it is a susceptible cultivar. On the other hand, a slight decrease in relative water content (1%, 3%), a slight increase in total chlorophyll content (6%), intense CAT activity (50%, 67%) and SOD activity (30%), but a decrease in lipid peroxidation level (5%, 22%) and a decrease in H2O2 content (11%, 15%), were detected in the Rio Grande cultivar in PEG and water scarcity treatment compared to the control, proving that this cultivar is resistant to drought and can be effectively grown in water-scarce areas. It was determined that four tomato cultivars had different perception and antioxidant defense systems against drought stress. As a result, when four tomato cultivars under different drought stress levels were evaluated in terms of physiological and biochemical parameters, the tolerance levels were determined as Rio Grande > Tyfrane F1 ≈ Tyfrane F1 > H−2274 > Falcon. In this context, the different responses of tomato cultivars to PEG and water scarcity are important for the selection of drought-resistant cultivars and the development of strategies to increase plant productivity under abiotic stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced root and shoot lengths, chlorophyll, water content, biomass and antioxidant enzyme activity in Falcon.

Material
Falcone0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root–shoot lengths, chlorophyll content, relative water content, fresh and dry weights, and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress leads to decreased root–shoot lengths, chlorophyll content, relative water content, fresh and dry weights, and antioxidant enzyme activities in Falcon and H−2274 cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced the same physiological and enzyme responses in H−2274.

Material
H−2274e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root–shoot lengths, chlorophyll content, relative water content, fresh and dry weights, and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress leads to decreased root–shoot lengths, chlorophyll content, relative water content, fresh and dry weights, and antioxidant enzyme activities in Falcon and H−2274 cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased TBARs and H2O2 in Falcon and H−2274.

Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
TBARs and H2O2 amountse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Falcon and H−2274 cultures, increasing TBARs and H2O2 amounts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1254 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress leads to”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon shoot length fell 21% under PEG and 37% under water scarcity versus control.

Material
Falcone0
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity applicatione1
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%, 37%e0
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Falcon cultivar had significantly reduced shoot length (21%, 37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1555 · show in text ↑
e1

“under PEG and water scarcity application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1712 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon relative water content fell 20% under PEG and 30% under water scarcity.

Material
Falcone4
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity applicatione2
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
reducede1
Value
20%, 30%e0
Comparator
the controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content (20%, 30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1590 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly reduced shoot length (21%, 37%), relative water content (20%, 30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1590 · show in text ↑
e2

“under PEG and water scarcity application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1712 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e4

“Falcon cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon chlorophyll content fell 7% under PEG and 23% under water scarcity.

Material
Falcone3
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity applicatione1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7%, 23%e0
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reduced shoot length (21%, 37%), relative water content (20%, 30%), chlorophyll content (7%, 23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1621 · show in text ↑
e1

“under PEG and water scarcity application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1712 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“Falcon cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon fresh weight fell 51% under PEG and 49% under water scarcity.

Material
Falcone3
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity applicatione1
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
51%, 49%e0
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reduced shoot length (21%, 37%), relative water content (20%, 30%), chlorophyll content (7%, 23%), fresh weight (51%, 49%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1646 · show in text ↑
e1

“under PEG and water scarcity application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1712 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“Falcon cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon dry weight fell 9% under PEG and 29% under water scarcity.

Material
Falcone3
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity applicatione1
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9%, 29%e0
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reduced shoot length (21%, 37%), relative water content (20%, 30%), chlorophyll content (7%, 23%), fresh weight (51%, 49%) and dry weight (9%, 29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1671 · show in text ↑
e1

“under PEG and water scarcity application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1712 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“Falcon cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon TBARs increased 2% under PEG and 14% under water scarcity.

Material
Falcone2
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity applicatione1
Outcome
TBARse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2%, 14%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TBARs (2%, 14%) and H2O2 content (3%, 15%) were significantly increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1842 · show in text ↑
e1

“under PEG and water scarcity application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e2

“Falcon cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon H2O2 content increased 3% under PEG and 15% under water scarcity.

Material
Falcone2
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity applicatione1
Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3%, 15%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TBARs (2%, 14%) and H2O2 content (3%, 15%) were significantly increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1842 · show in text ↑
e1

“under PEG and water scarcity application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
e2

“Falcon cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande relative water content decreased 1% under PEG and 3% under water scarcity.

Material
Rio Grandee1
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity treatmente1
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
1%, 3%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a slight decrease in relative water content (1%, 3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–1958 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande cultivar in PEG and water scarcity treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande total chlorophyll content increased 6%.

Material
Rio Grandee1
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity treatmente1
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a slight increase in total chlorophyll content (6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2011 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande cultivar in PEG and water scarcity treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande CAT activity was intense, at 50% and 67%, under the two drought treatments.

Material
Rio Grandee1
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity treatmente1
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Value
50%, 67%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intense CAT activity (50%, 67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2013–2044 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande cultivar in PEG and water scarcity treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande SOD activity increased 30%.

Material
Rio Grandee1
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity treatmente1
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD activity (30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2049–2067 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande cultivar in PEG and water scarcity treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande lipid peroxidation decreased 5% under PEG and 22% under water scarcity.

Material
Rio Grandee1
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity treatmente1
Outcome
lipid peroxidation levele0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
5%, 22%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in lipid peroxidation level (5%, 22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande cultivar in PEG and water scarcity treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande H2O2 content decreased 11% under PEG and 15% under water scarcity.

Material
Rio Grandee1
Treatment
PEG and water scarcity treatmente1
Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
11%, 15%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in H2O2 content (11%, 15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2126–2163 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande cultivar in PEG and water scarcity treatment compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande was judged drought resistant and suitable for water-scarce areas.

Material
Rio Grandee1
Outcome
can be effectively grown in water-scarce arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this cultivar is resistant to drought and can be effectively grown in water-scarce areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2280–2368 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Falcon was judged susceptible to drought.

Material
Falcone1
Outcome
a susceptible cultivare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proving that it is a susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1885 · show in text ↑
e1

“Falcon cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four cultivars differed in drought perception and antioxidant defense.

Outcome
different perception and antioxidant defense systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four tomato cultivars had different perception and antioxidant defense systems against drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2393–2494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reported drought tolerance ranked Rio Grande highest and Falcon lowest.

Outcome
tolerance levelse0
Qualifier
Rio Grande > Tyfrane F1 ≈ Tyfrane F1 > H−2274 > Falcone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tolerance levels were determined as Rio Grande > Tyfrane F1 ≈ Tyfrane F1 > H−2274 > Falcon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2647–2737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars at Different Drought Stress Levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

35 papers: 6 positive, 29 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

40 papers: 9 positive, 31 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

63 papers: 11 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

drought · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 27 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.