Paper · 2017 · Botanical studies

Enzymatic and non-enzymatic comparison of two different industrial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) varieties against drought stress

Özge Çelik; Alp Ayan; Çimen Atak

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the tolerance mechanisms of two industrial tomato varieties (X5671R and 5MX12956) under drought stress. 14 days-old tomato seedlings were subjected to 7 days-long drought stress by withholding irrigation. The effects of stress were determined by enzymatic and non-enzymatic parameters. The physiological damages were evaluated via lipid peroxidation ratio, total protein content, relative water content, chlorophyll content and proline accumulation. Enzymatic responses were determined by biochemical analysis and electrophoresis of SOD, APX, POX and CAT enzymes. RESULTS: Relative water contents of X5671R and 5MX12956 varieties at 7th day of drought were decreased to 8.4 and 12.2%, respectively. Applied drought decreased all photosynthetic pigments of X5671R and 5MX12956 varieties during the treatment period significantly comparing to the Day 0 as the control. Total protein content, lipid peroxidation and proline accumulation presented increased values in both varieties in accordance with the increasing stress intensity. According to lipid peroxidation analysis, 5MX12956 tomato variety was found more drought sensitive than X5671R variety. Antioxidative enzyme activities showed increases in both varieties as a response to drought stress, although CAT and APX activities presented decrease on the 7th day of applied stress. 7 days long drought stress differentially altered POX, APX and SOD isozyme patterns. Same POX bands were observed in both varieties with different band intensities. CONCLUSIONS: However, main isozyme pattern differences were obtained for SOD and APX. APX1, Fe-SOD and Cu/Zn-SOD2 isozyme bands should be evaluated to define their main role in the tolerance mechanism of both tomato varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content of X5671R decreased to 8.4% on day seven.

Material
X5671Re0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Relative water contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water contents of X5671R and 5MX12956 varieties at 7th day of drought were decreased to 8.4 and 12.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content of 5MX12956 decreased to 12.2% on day seven.

Material
5MX12956e0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Relative water contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water contents of X5671R and 5MX12956 varieties at 7th day of drought were decreased to 8.4 and 12.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased all photosynthetic pigments in X5671R relative to day zero.

Material
X5671Re0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
all photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
Day 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied drought decreased all photosynthetic pigments of X5671R and 5MX12956 varieties during the treatment period significantly comparing to the Day 0 as the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased all photosynthetic pigments in 5MX12956 relative to day zero.

Material
5MX12956e0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
all photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
Day 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied drought decreased all photosynthetic pigments of X5671R and 5MX12956 varieties during the treatment period significantly comparing to the Day 0 as the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content, lipid peroxidation and proline accumulation increased with stress intensity in both varieties.

Treatment
stress intensitye0
Outcome
Total protein content, lipid peroxidation and proline accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total protein content, lipid peroxidation and proline accumulation presented increased values in both varieties in accordance with the increasing stress intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipid peroxidation indicated greater drought sensitivity in 5MX12956 than X5671R.

Material
5MX12956e0
Outcome
drought sensitivee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
X5671Re0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to lipid peroxidation analysis, 5MX12956 tomato variety was found more drought sensitive than X5671R variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidative enzyme activities increased in both varieties under drought.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Antioxidative enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidative enzyme activities showed increases in both varieties as a response to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity decreased on the seventh day of drought.

Treatment
applied stresse0
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
CAT and APX activitiese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAT and APX activities presented decrease on the 7th day of applied stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APX activity decreased on the seventh day of drought.

Treatment
applied stresse0
Gene
APXe0
Outcome
APX activitiese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAT and APX activities presented decrease on the 7th day of applied stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought altered POX, APX and SOD isozyme patterns differently.

Treatment
7 days long drought stresse0
Outcome
POX, APX and SOD isozyme patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7 days long drought stress differentially altered POX, APX and SOD isozyme patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both varieties had the same POX bands with different intensities.

Outcome
Same POX bandse0
Qualifier
different band intensitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Same POX bands were observed in both varieties with different band intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The main isozyme pattern differences were for SOD and APX.

Gene
SOD and APXe0
Outcome
isozyme pattern differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“main isozyme pattern differences were obtained for SOD and APX.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend evaluating APX1, Fe-SOD and Cu/Zn-SOD2 bands for roles in drought tolerance.

Outcome
APX1, Fe-SOD and Cu/Zn-SOD2 isozyme bands should be evaluatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“APX1, Fe-SOD and Cu/Zn-SOD2 isozyme bands should be evaluated to define their main role in the tolerance mechanism of both tomato varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1775 · show in text ↑

drought · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 6 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.