Paper · 2025 · Applied Food Research

Effects of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) elicitation on protein content and digestibility, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activity in sprouted chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)

Alejandra Linares-Castañeda; Cristian Jiménez-Martínez; Ana Elena Cedillo-Olivos; et al.

5
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• Sprouting and elicitation cause changes in chickpea chemical composition. • Optimal conditions were 3 h of soaking in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 during 5 days. • Optimization with H 2 O 2 increased protein content (16.36 %) and IVPD (31.47 %). • Optimization with H 2 O 2 increased TPC (44.61 %) and AOX (7.57 %). • Elicitation generates cellular changes in chickpea cotyledons. Chickpea consumption may be beneficial in the prevention of chronic degenerative diseases due to the presence of bioactive compounds. Sprouting and elicitation have been suggested as methods to enhance the nutritional and biofunctional properties of legumes. This study aims to evaluate the effect of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) as an elicitor, the soaking time, and sprouting time in days, in the nutritional quality and biofunctional compounds (phenolic compounds) with antioxidant properties in chickpeas. The Box-Behnken design was used to determine the optimal soaking time, elicitor concentration, and sprouting time to maximize protein content, in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD), total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity (AOX). The optimal germination conditions were soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 days, with maximal protein content (24.39 %) and IVPD (96.29 %), TPC (206.73 mg GAE/100 g) and AOX (121.18 μmol TE/100 g). These results were significantly higher than those from sprouting without elicitors and raw seeds, demonstrating that germination combined with elicitors enhances legume flours biofunctionality and nutritional quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal germination involved soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM hydrogen peroxide and sprouting for 5 days.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 dayse0
Outcome
optimal germination conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal germination conditions were soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“sprouted chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized hydrogen peroxide elicitation produced protein content of 24.39 %.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 dayse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
maximale0
Value
24.39 %e0
Comparator
sprouting without elicitors and raw seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal germination conditions were soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 days, with maximal protein content (24.39 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1264 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher than those from sprouting without elicitors and raw seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“sprouted chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized hydrogen peroxide elicitation produced in vitro protein digestibility of 96.29 %.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 dayse0
Outcome
IVPDe0
Direction
highere1
Value
96.29 %e0
Comparator
sprouting without elicitors and raw seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal germination conditions were soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 days, with maximal protein content (24.39 %) and IVPD (96.29 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher than those from sprouting without elicitors and raw seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1440 · show in text ↑
e2

“in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“sprouted chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized hydrogen peroxide elicitation produced total phenolic content of 206.73 mg GAE/100 g.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 dayse0
Outcome
TPCe0
Direction
highere1
Value
206.73 mg GAE/100 ge0
Comparator
sprouting without elicitors and raw seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal germination conditions were soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 days, with maximal protein content (24.39 %) and IVPD (96.29 %), TPC (206.73 mg GAE/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher than those from sprouting without elicitors and raw seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1440 · show in text ↑
e2

“total phenolic content (TPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“sprouted chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized hydrogen peroxide elicitation produced antioxidant activity of 121.18 μmol TE/100 g.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 dayse0
Outcome
AOXe0
Direction
highere1
Value
121.18 μmol TE/100 ge0
Comparator
sprouting without elicitors and raw seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal germination conditions were soaking for 3 h in 34.34 mM H 2 O 2 and sprouting for 5 days, with maximal protein content (24.39 %) and IVPD (96.29 %), TPC (206.73 mg GAE/100 g) and AOX (121.18 μmol TE/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1341 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher than those from sprouting without elicitors and raw seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1440 · show in text ↑
e2

“antioxidant activity (AOX)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“sprouted chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–173 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.