Paper · 2001 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of processing and cooking on ascorbic acid content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) varieties

Monika Sood; S R Malhotra

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L) is an important source of protein in several developing countries. Two commonly grown chickpea cultivars, HPG‐17 and C‐235, were evaluated for their physicochemical characteristics such as 100‐seed weight and density. Both chickpea varieties were subjected to various processing treatments and then analysed for their ascorbic acid content. The ascorbic acid content was generally found to be higher in the C‐235 variety, but it was higher in the HPG‐17 variety after germination. Significant results were obtained for both varieties after various treatments such as pressure cooking, germination, parching and solar cooking. It was found that the ascorbic acid content in both varieties decreased after all treatments except germination. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C‐235 generally had higher ascorbic acid content than HPG‐17.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
C‐235e0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ascorbic acid content was generally found to be higher in the C‐235 variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After germination HPG‐17 had higher ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
HPG‐17e0
Treatment
germinatione0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ascorbic acid content was generally found to be higher in the C‐235 variety, but it was higher in the HPG‐17 variety after germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Processing other than germination decreased ascorbic acid in both varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
all treatments except germinatione0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ascorbic acid content in both varieties decreased after all treatments except germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The processing effects on ascorbic acid were significant for both cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
various treatments such as pressure cooking, germination, parching and solar cookinge0
Outcome
Significant resultse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant results were obtained for both varieties after various treatments such as pressure cooking, germination, parching and solar cooking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.