Paper · 2025 · Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture

Chromatic Crescendo: Night light colours boost Chrysanthemum growth and bloom

Ranjit Singh; Dhawan Shweta Macchindra; Madhu Bala

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This innovative study, conducted at the Research Farm, Department of Floriculture and Landscaping, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, from 2018 to 2019, investigated the effects of coloured LED night breaks on Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. growth and flowering. Ten diverse cultivars were subjected to red, green, and blue light treatments from mid-August to late October, followed by natural day length exposure. Our findings reveal a nuanced interplay between light colour and genotype, significantly influencing plant architecture, flowering dynamics, and pigment production. Red light emerged as a maestro of stem elongation, producing the tallest plants (mean height 100.97 cm), while blue light conducted a powerful performance in stem thickening (mean diameter 7.81 mm) and stomatal development (up to 54.66 stomata per mm²). Green light accelerated flowering, with bud appearance as early as 55.79 days in ‘Thai Chin Queen’. Vase life peaked at 17.57 days under red light for ‘Snow Ball’, while flower size reached 19.24 cm in ‘Snow Ball’ under blue light. Anthocyanin content was highest (2.19 mg g-1) in ‘Thai Chin Queen’ under blue light, and carotenoids peaked (97.18 mg g-1) in ‘Pusa Centenary’ under blue light. This research unveils the potential for tailored light recipes in chrysanthemum cultivation, promising enhanced control over growth, flowering, and quality traits. Our results pave the way for innovative, sustainable practices in ornamental horticulture, offering a spectrum of possibilities for precision floriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light produced the tallest chrysanthemum plants, with mean height 100.97 cm.

Taxon
Red lighte0
Treatment
Red lighte0
Outcome
mean heighte0
Direction
talleste0
Value
100.97 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Red light emerged as a maestro of stem elongation, producing the tallest plants (mean height 100.97 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light produced the greatest stem diameter, 7.81 mm.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
mean diametere0
Direction
stem thickeninge0
Value
7.81 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue light conducted a powerful performance in stem thickening (mean diameter 7.81 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light produced up to 54.66 stomata per mm².

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
stomatal developmente0
Direction
up toe0
Value
54.66 stomata per mm²e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue light conducted a powerful performance in stem thickening (mean diameter 7.81 mm) and stomatal development (up to 54.66 stomata per mm²)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green light accelerated bud appearance in Thai Chin Queen to 55.79 days.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
‘Thai Chin Queen’e0
Treatment
Green lighte0
Outcome
bud appearancee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Value
55.79 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green light accelerated flowering, with bud appearance as early as 55.79 days in ‘Thai Chin Queen’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Snow Ball had peak vase life of 17.57 days under red light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
‘Snow Ball’e0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
Vase lifee0
Direction
peakede0
Value
17.57 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vase life peaked at 17.57 days under red light for ‘Snow Ball’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Snow Ball flower size reached 19.24 cm under blue light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
‘Snow Ball’e0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
flower sizee0
Direction
reachede0
Value
19.24 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flower size reached 19.24 cm in ‘Snow Ball’ under blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thai Chin Queen had the highest anthocyanin content, 2.19 mg g-1, under blue light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
‘Thai Chin Queen’e0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
Anthocyanin contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.19 mg g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin content was highest (2.19 mg g-1) in ‘Thai Chin Queen’ under blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Centenary had peak carotenoids of 97.18 mg g-1 under blue light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
‘Pusa Centenary’e0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
peakede0
Value
97.18 mg g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carotenoids peaked (97.18 mg g-1) in ‘Pusa Centenary’ under blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑

light · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

light · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

63 papers: 47 positive, 16 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · ChrysanthemumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · ChrysanthemumResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.