Paper · 2024 · Crop Science

High plant density optimizes leaf stomatal traits for accelerating the stomatal response rate at the lower cotton canopy

Xilin Li; Xiaoming Li; Tong Zhang; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plants are often exposed to fluctuating light from a few seconds to a few minutes due to cloud movements, mutual shading of leaves, and change in the angle of the sun. Slow stomatal response to fluctuating light leads to carbon loss, but the influence of planting density on light fluctuation frequency and on stomatal response and carbon gain has yet to be fully explored. To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated leaf morphology, stomatal anatomy and response rate, nitrogen content, biomass, and yield under low density, moderate density, and high density (HD) of cotton cultivar ( Gossypium hirsutum L.). The results showed that higher planting density significantly increased light fluctuation frequency at the lower canopy. Stomatal size significantly decreased with the increase in planting density, while total stomatal density was consistent. Stomatal density had greater plasticity of determining maximum stomatal conductance than stomatal size. Faster stomatal response rate to fluctuating light under HD was attributed to smaller and denser stomata in the abaxial leaf side. Therefore, cotton under HD treatment had faster photosynthetic induction rate under light induction, resulting in greater carbon gain. We conclude that faster stomatal response rate achieved by the optimization of stomatal anatomy, especially the abaxial side, plays a crucial role in obtaining more carbon gain, biomass, and yield under HD cotton field. This finding indicates that selecting varieties with rapid stomatal response traits and planting at appropriate densities may optimize fluctuating light use to achieve higher yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased light fluctuation frequency in the lower canopy.

Organ / stage
lower canopye0
Treatment
higher planting densitye0
Outcome
light fluctuation frequencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher planting density significantly increased light fluctuation frequency at the lower canopy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal size decreased with increasing planting density.

Treatment
increase in planting densitye0
Outcome
Stomatal sizee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal size significantly decreased with the increase in planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total stomatal density stayed consistent across planting densities.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
total stomatal densitye0
Direction
consistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal size significantly decreased with the increase in planting density, while total stomatal density was consistent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal density had greater plasticity in determining maximum conductance than size.

Organ / stage
Stomatal densitye0
Outcome
maximum stomatal conductancee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
stomatal sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal density had greater plasticity of determining maximum stomatal conductance than stomatal size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density accelerated stomatal response under fluctuating light.

Organ / stage
abaxial leaf sidee0
Treatment
HDe0
Outcome
stomatal response ratee0
Direction
Fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faster stomatal response rate to fluctuating light under HD was attributed to smaller and denser stomata in the abaxial leaf side.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed faster stomatal response to smaller and denser abaxial stomata.

Organ / stage
abaxial leaf sidee0
Outcome
Faster stomatal response ratee0
Qualifier
smaller and denser stomatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faster stomatal response rate to fluctuating light under HD was attributed to smaller and denser stomata in the abaxial leaf side.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density accelerated photosynthetic induction under light induction.

Treatment
HD treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic induction ratee0
Direction
fastere0
Qualifier
under light inductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton under HD treatment had faster photosynthetic induction rate under light induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density increased carbon gain.

Treatment
HDe0
Outcome
carbon gaine0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton under HD treatment had faster photosynthetic induction rate under light induction, resulting in greater carbon gain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1233 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors linked fast stomatal response under high density to more biomass and yield.

Treatment
HDe0
Outcome
biomass, and yielde0
Qualifier
faster stomatal response rate achieved by the optimization of stomatal anatomye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faster stomatal response rate achieved by the optimization of stomatal anatomy, especially the abaxial side, plays a crucial role in obtaining more carbon gain, biomass, and yield under HD cotton field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1453 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend rapid-response varieties and appropriate densities to improve yield.

Outcome
selecting varieties with rapid stomatal response traits and planting at appropriate densitiese0
Qualifier
may optimize fluctuating light use to achieve higher yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selecting varieties with rapid stomatal response traits and planting at appropriate densities may optimize fluctuating light use to achieve higher yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1636 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.