Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Physiological Determinants and Yield Components as Influenced by High Density Planting System in Cotton

T. Raghavendra; Y. Rama Reddy

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

High density planting system have the potential for increased yields in high yielding, high input production systems. To attain higher yields in high density planting system in cotton relative to conventional spaced cotton must depend on increased biomass production or partitioning to boll. The present experiment was conducted for two consecutive seasons to analyse the morpho- phenological characters and leaf CO2 exchange rates of cotton in five different spacings i.e. 45 x 10 cm2, 45 x 15 cm2,45 x 20 cm2, 45 x 30 cm2 and 60 x 30 cm2 in two American cotton genotypes i.e NDLH1938 and NH 615.Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.While in closer spacings early square formation and flowering was observed, but dry matter partitioning was slower and total biomass production was significantly low (78.6gm) and consequently the boll weight was less (3.2gm) leading to decreased economic yield. The effect of plant density on leaf area index is additive and varied with plant density from about 4.24- 5.78. Even though the density of plants was increased there is seldom increment in kapas yield as the partitioning is affected due to decrease in leaf CO2 exchange rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.

Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
boll numbere0
Direction
highere0
Value
26.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.

Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
sympodiae0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.

Organ / stage
peak bloom stagee0
Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.

Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
highere0
Value
422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.

Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing produced significantly higher growth attributes like boll number (26.3) sympodia (12.4), leaf photosynthetic rate (26.25 μmol m-2 sec-1) at peak bloom stage, stomatal conductance (422.58 μmol H2O m-2 sec-1) and transpiration rate (4.89 mmol H2O m-2sec-1) at boll formation stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

in closer spacings early square formation and flowering was observed

Treatment
closer spacingse0
Outcome
early square formation and floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in closer spacings early square formation and flowering was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

but dry matter partitioning was slower and total biomass production was significantly low (78.6gm) and consequently the boll weight was less (3.2gm) leading to decreased economic yield.

Treatment
closer spacingse1
Outcome
dry matter partitioninge0
Direction
slowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but dry matter partitioning was slower and total biomass production was significantly low (78.6gm) and consequently the boll weight was less (3.2gm) leading to decreased economic yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“in closer spacings early square formation and flowering was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–964 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

total biomass production was significantly low (78.6gm)

Treatment
closer spacingse1
Outcome
total biomass productione0
Direction
lowe0
Value
78.6gme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total biomass production was significantly low (78.6gm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“in closer spacings early square formation and flowering was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–964 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

the boll weight was less (3.2gm)

Treatment
closer spacingse1
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
3.2gme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the boll weight was less (3.2gm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“in closer spacings early square formation and flowering was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–964 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

leading to decreased economic yield.

Treatment
closer spacingse1
Outcome
economic yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to decreased economic yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“in closer spacings early square formation and flowering was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–964 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of plant density on leaf area index is additive and varied with plant density from about 4.24- 5.78.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
variede0
Value
4.24- 5.78e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of plant density on leaf area index is additive and varied with plant density from about 4.24- 5.78.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Even though the density of plants was increased there is seldom increment in kapas yield as the partitioning is affected due to decrease in leaf CO2 exchange rates.

Treatment
density of plants was increasede0
Outcome
kapas yielde0
Direction
seldom incremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even though the density of plants was increased there is seldom increment in kapas yield as the partitioning is affected due to decrease in leaf CO2 exchange rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

density · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.