Paper · 2011 · Mianhua xuebao

Effects of Growth Regulators(DPC) on Canopy Architecture and Yield Characteristics of Cotton under Different Planting Densities

Wangfeng Zhang

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the effect of growth regulators(DPC) on canopy architecture and yield characteristics of cotton at different planting densities,two elements experiment with two levels of growth regulator and three plant densities was conducted.Results showed that under different levels of growth regulator,the leaf area index(LAI) and mean foliage angle(MFA) increased as planting density increased,while the canopy transmission coefficiency for radiation penetration(TR) decreased.Very high planting density impacted the canopy structure negatively,resulting in a rapid decline of canopy photosynthetic rate(CAP).The LAI,MFA and CAP decreased with the amount of growth regulator increasing,but TR increased.Although light interception index and dry matter weight reduced,the proportion of dry-matter distributing to the reproductive organs increased rapidly.The LAI,MFA and CAP displayed a highly significant positive correlation with boll number and yields of lint at later full bolling and boll opening stage.The TR correlated negatively with dry matter of above-ground from flowering to boll opening stage.Therefore,enhancement of leaf area,mean foliage inclination angle and photosynthesis capacity during full bolling and boll opening stage could lead to increase of yield of lint.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index and mean foliage angle of cotton increased as planting density increased.

Treatment
planting densitye1
Outcome
leaf area index(LAI) and mean foliage angle(MFA)e1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the leaf area index(LAI) and mean foliage angle(MFA) increased as planting density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy transmission coefficient for radiation penetration of cotton decreased as planting density increased.

Treatment
planting densitye1
Outcome
canopy transmission coefficiency for radiation penetration(TR)e1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the leaf area index(LAI) and mean foliage angle(MFA) increased as planting density increased,while the canopy transmission coefficiency for radiation penetration(TR) decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very high planting density reduced canopy photosynthetic rate of cotton.

Treatment
Very high planting densitye2
Outcome
canopy photosynthetic rate(CAP)e2
Direction
rapid declinee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Very high planting density impacted the canopy structure negatively,resulting in a rapid decline of canopy photosynthetic rate(CAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulator decreased leaf area index, mean foliage angle and canopy photosynthetic rate of cotton.

Treatment
growth regulatore3
Outcome
LAI,MFA and CAPe3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The LAI,MFA and CAP decreased with the amount of growth regulator increasing,but TR increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulator increased canopy transmission coefficient for radiation penetration of cotton.

Treatment
growth regulatore3
Outcome
TRe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The LAI,MFA and CAP decreased with the amount of growth regulator increasing,but TR increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light interception index and dry matter weight of cotton were reduced by growth regulator.

Treatment
growth regulatore3
Outcome
light interception index and dry matter weighte4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Although light interception index and dry matter weight reduced,the proportion of dry-matter distributing to the reproductive organs increased rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–861 · show in text ↑
e3

“The LAI,MFA and CAP decreased with the amount of growth regulator increasing,but TR increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proportion of dry matter distributed to reproductive organs of cotton increased rapidly.

Organ / stage
reproductive organse4
Treatment
growth regulatore3
Outcome
proportion of dry-matter distributing to the reproductive organse4
Direction
increased rapidlye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the proportion of dry-matter distributing to the reproductive organs increased rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–861 · show in text ↑
e3

“The LAI,MFA and CAP decreased with the amount of growth regulator increasing,but TR increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index, mean foliage angle and canopy photosynthetic rate of cotton correlated positively with boll number and lint yield at later full bolling and boll opening stage.

Organ / stage
later full bolling and boll opening stagee5
Outcome
boll number and yields of linte5
Direction
positive correlatione5
Qualifier
highly significante5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The LAI,MFA and CAP displayed a highly significant positive correlation with boll number and yields of lint at later full bolling and boll opening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy transmission coefficient for radiation penetration of cotton correlated negatively with above-ground dry matter from flowering to boll opening.

Organ / stage
from flowering to boll opening stagee6
Outcome
dry matter of above-grounde6
Direction
correlated negativelye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The TR correlated negatively with dry matter of above-ground from flowering to boll opening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Enhancing leaf area, mean foliage inclination angle and photosynthesis capacity during full bolling and boll opening could increase cotton lint yield.

Treatment
enhancement of leaf areae7
Outcome
yield of linte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Therefore,enhancement of leaf area,mean foliage inclination angle and photosynthesis capacity during full bolling and boll opening stage could lead to increase of yield of lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–127 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

density · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

class · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.