Paper · 2024 · Journal of agriculture and biology.

Nutrient Biofortification of microgreens (spinach) to combat hidden hunger

Tahira Abbas; Khadija Altaf; Muhammad Tasadaq; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nutrient deficiency is a major cause of different health disorders in human beings. Malnutrition has become more alarming in under-developed countries and might affect more than 3 billion people in the world. Supplementation and food fortification of vegetable crops with minerals can address the issue of adequate nutrition security. Current study was focused to assess the nutritional status of vegetables after supplementation of different macro and micronutrients. The trial was conducted in growth room, Department of Horticulture, University of Layyah, Layyah. Seed of spinach was procured from a certified agency and directly sown in the trays (2 inches deep). This study employed a total of twenty four treatment conditions, comprising three distinct nutrient treatments (including Fe, Zn, and Ca) as well as a control treatment. Every nutrient was applied in three different concentrations following two application methods, constituting six treatments of individual nutrient. Each treatment was replicated three times, each replication containing 1 tray. The end produce was analyzed for different attributes like morphological parameters, biochemical parameters (Total soluble solids, Vitamin C, acidity, carotenoids, chlorophyll contents, lipophilic antioxidant (LPA), starch contents, amino acids, carotenoids, flavonoids, phenolic contents and ionic contents (Fe, Zn, and Ca) . Our results indicated that supplementation of 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and 200ppm calcium concentration is optimal for maintaining the normal growth of plants and to promote the major Zn, Fe and Ca concentration in the edible part of spinach. Thus, it could be proposed that the growth of spinach under 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and Ca @200ppm increased the intake of these nutrients and other beneficial compounds for the human health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementation with 200 ppm Zn, Fe at 1.5 mM and 200 ppm Ca is optimal for maintaining the normal growth of spinach.

Treatment
supplementation of 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and 200ppm calcium concentratione1
Outcome
maintaining the normal growth of plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Biofortification of microgreens (spinach) to combat hidden hunger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results indicated that supplementation of 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and 200ppm calcium concentration is optimal for maintaining the normal growth of plants and to promote the major Zn, Fe and Ca concentration in the edible part of spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementation with 200 ppm Zn, Fe at 1.5 mM and 200 ppm Ca promoted Zn, Fe and Ca concentration in the edible part of spinach relative to a control treatment.

Organ / stage
edible parte1
Treatment
supplementation of 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and 200ppm calcium concentratione1
Outcome
Zn, Fe and Ca concentration in the edible parte1
Direction
promotee1
Comparator
control treatmente2
Setting
growth roome3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Biofortification of microgreens (spinach) to combat hidden hunger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results indicated that supplementation of 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and 200ppm calcium concentration is optimal for maintaining the normal growth of plants and to promote the major Zn, Fe and Ca concentration in the edible part of spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1629 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study employed a total of twenty four treatment conditions, comprising three distinct nutrient treatments (including Fe, Zn, and Ca) as well as a control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–836 · show in text ↑
e3

“The trial was conducted in growth room, Department of Horticulture, University of Layyah, Layyah”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–565 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of spinach under 200 ppm Zn, Fe at 1.5 mM and 200 ppm Ca was proposed to increase intake of these nutrients and other beneficial compounds for human health.

Treatment
growth of spinach under 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and Ca @200ppme4
Outcome
intake of these nutrientse4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Biofortification of microgreens (spinach) to combat hidden hunger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e4

“Thus, it could be proposed that the growth of spinach under 200ppm Zn, Fe @1.5mM and Ca @200ppm increased the intake of these nutrients and other beneficial compounds for the human health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1818 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.