Abstract
Phenolic hydroxyl group (ArOH) plays an important role in humic acid (HA) enhancing nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency. However, the content of ArOH in HA is usually low, while its traditional enriching modification are inefficient or even showed a potential toxicity risk. In this work, we developed a novel catalyst named CuO@Al 2 O 3 enriched with mesopores and oxygen vacancies, and target-modified HA to increase its ArOH using a feasible mechanical catalytic method. The results showed that phenolic-rich HA (CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HA) were successfully prepared with 40 % higher ArOH content than HA, which was consistent with the 43.13 % increase in C-O/Ar-O content in XPS C1s spectra. Compared to RHA, CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HA had less tannin attributed to the Ar-C bond breakage catalyzed by CuO@Al 2 O 3 to form ArOH. Subsequently, we prepared CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HA-enhanced urea (CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAU), and found that CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAU improved maize seedling growth by the elevation of leaf chlorophyll content (by 8.78 %) and lowering N loss by NH 3 volatilization inhibition (by 12.43 %), thus enhanced the biomass and N uptake of maize seedling by 11.29 % and 21.22 %, respectively, compared to RHA-enhanced urea (RHAU). Therefore, this study provided a method to enrich the ArOH content of HA, and a green approach for the upgrading of high-efficiency urea products. • CuO@Al 2 O 3 with mesopores and oxygen vacancies was mechanochemically synthesized. • CuO@Al 2 O 3 selectively catalyzed the cleavage of Ar-C bonds in humic acid. • Phe-group content in humic acid was sharply improved by 40 %. • Pot experiment confirmed the effectiveness in promoting root growth and N uptake. • Soil incubation experiment revealed mechanism on optimized N utilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Modified urea raised maize leaf chlorophyll by 8.78%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAU improved maize seedling growth by the elevation of leaf chlorophyll content (by 8.78 %) and lowering N loss by NH 3 volatilization inhibition (by 12.43 %)”
e1“CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAU improved maize seedling growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Modified urea lowered nitrogen loss through ammonia volatilization by 12.43%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lowering N loss by NH 3 volatilization inhibition (by 12.43 %)”
t0“maize seedling”
e1“CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAU improved maize seedling growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Modified urea enhanced maize seedling biomass by 11.29% relative to RHAU.
- Treatment
- CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAUe1
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 11.29 %e0
- Comparator
- RHA-enhanced urea (RHAU)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“enhanced the biomass and N uptake of maize seedling by 11.29 % and 21.22 %, respectively, compared to RHA-enhanced urea (RHAU)”
t0“maize seedling”
e1“CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAU improved maize seedling growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Modified urea enhanced maize seedling nitrogen uptake by 21.22% relative to RHAU.
- Treatment
- CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAUe1
- Outcome
- N uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 21.22 %e0
- Comparator
- RHA-enhanced urea (RHAU)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“enhanced the biomass and N uptake of maize seedling by 11.29 % and 21.22 %, respectively, compared to RHA-enhanced urea (RHAU)”
t0“maize seedling”
e1“CuO@Al 2 O 3 -HAU improved maize seedling growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Pot experiments confirmed promoted root growth.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pot experiment confirmed the effectiveness in promoting root growth and N uptake”
t0“maize seedling”
The same questions in other papers
aluminium atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →aluminium atom · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →aluminium atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →ozone · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →ozone · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.