Abstract
The field experiment was under taken to evaluate the efficacy of different seven combination biopesticides viz. Metarhizium rileyi, Metarhizium rileyi + Lecanicillium lecanni, Metarhizium rileyi + Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae (local strain) + Beauveria bassiana, Lecanicillium lecanni + Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium rileyi + Lecanicillium lecanni + Beauveria bassiana, Lecanicillium lecanni + Beauveria bassiana + Metarhizium rileyi + Metarhizium anisopliae against soybean pests during 2023-2024 was conducted at Department of Entomology, VNMKV., Parbhani. The result revealed that against Spodoptera litura, Helicoverpa armigera, semilooper concluded that all the biopesticides treatment were found significantly superior in recording minimum number of defoliators. In most of cases among all biopesticides the microbial agent treatment L. lecanii + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae found significantly superior over rest of the treatments by recording lowest population of larvae/mrl. Next best microbial agent treatments were M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana which were found at par with each other. It was followed by microbial agent treatments, M rileyi + B. bassiana and L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. rileyi + L. lecanni and M. rileyi. The treatments with L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae recorded the highest yield (1880.60 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:5 followed by treatment M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana (1774.24 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.8, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana (1655.61 kg/ha yield) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.55, which were found at par with each other.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
All biopesticide treatments significantly reduced Spodoptera litura defoliators.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- biopesticides treatmente0
- Interactor
- Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera liturae0pest - Outcome
- minimum number of defoliatorse0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The result revealed that against Spodoptera litura, Helicoverpa armigera, semilooper concluded that all the biopesticides treatment were found significantly superior in recording minimum number of defoliators.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
All biopesticide treatments significantly reduced Helicoverpa armigera defoliators.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- biopesticides treatmente0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- minimum number of defoliatorse0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The result revealed that against Spodoptera litura, Helicoverpa armigera, semilooper concluded that all the biopesticides treatment were found significantly superior in recording minimum number of defoliators.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
All biopesticide treatments significantly reduced semilooper defoliators.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- biopesticides treatmente0
- Interactor
- semiloopere0pest
- Outcome
- minimum number of defoliatorse0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The result revealed that against Spodoptera litura, Helicoverpa armigera, semilooper concluded that all the biopesticides treatment were found significantly superior in recording minimum number of defoliators.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
The four-agent treatment gave the lowest larval population among treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- L. lecanii + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliaee0
- Outcome
- population of larvae/mrle0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In most of cases among all biopesticides the microbial agent treatment L. lecanii + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae found significantly superior over rest of the treatments by recording lowest population of larvae/mrl.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana was among the next best pest-control treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- Next best microbial agent treatmentse0
- Qualifier
- at par with each othere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Next best microbial agent treatments were M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. anisopliae + B. bassiana was among the next best pest-control treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. anisopliae + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- Next best microbial agent treatmentse0
- Qualifier
- at par with each othere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Next best microbial agent treatments were M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M rileyi + B. bassiana followed the next-best pest-control treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M rileyi + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- followed by microbial agent treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was followed by microbial agent treatments, M rileyi + B. bassiana and L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. rileyi + L. lecanni and M. rileyi.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
L. lecanni + B. bassiana followed the next-best pest-control treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- L. lecanni + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- followed by microbial agent treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was followed by microbial agent treatments, M rileyi + B. bassiana and L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. rileyi + L. lecanni and M. rileyi.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. rileyi + L. lecanni followed the next-best pest-control treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. rileyi + L. lecannie0
- Outcome
- followed by microbial agent treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was followed by microbial agent treatments, M rileyi + B. bassiana and L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. rileyi + L. lecanni and M. rileyi.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. rileyi followed the next-best pest-control treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. rileyie0
- Outcome
- followed by microbial agent treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was followed by microbial agent treatments, M rileyi + B. bassiana and L. lecanni + B. bassiana, M. rileyi + L. lecanni and M. rileyi.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae produced soybean yield of 1880.60 q/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliaee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1880.60 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae recorded the highest yield (1880.60 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:5 followed by treatment M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana (1774.24 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.8, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana (1655.61 kg/ha yield) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.55, which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana produced soybean yield of 1774.24 q/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1774.24 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae recorded the highest yield (1880.60 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:5 followed by treatment M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana (1774.24 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.8, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana (1655.61 kg/ha yield) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.55, which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. anisopliae + B. bassiana produced soybean yield of 1655.61 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. anisopliae + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1655.61 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae recorded the highest yield (1880.60 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:5 followed by treatment M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana (1774.24 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.8, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana (1655.61 kg/ha yield) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.55, which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae had a benefit cost ratio of 1:5.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliaee0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 1:5e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae recorded the highest yield (1880.60 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:5 followed by treatment M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana (1774.24 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.8, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana (1655.61 kg/ha yield) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.55, which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana had a benefit cost ratio of 1:4.8.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 1:4.8e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae recorded the highest yield (1880.60 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:5 followed by treatment M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana (1774.24 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.8, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana (1655.61 kg/ha yield) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.55, which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
M. anisopliae + B. bassiana had a benefit cost ratio of 1:4.55.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- M. anisopliae + B. bassianae0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 1:4.55e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with L. lecanni + B. bassiana + M. rileyi + M. anisopliae recorded the highest yield (1880.60 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:5 followed by treatment M. rileyi + L. lecanni + B. bassiana (1774.24 q/ha) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.8, M. anisopliae + B. bassiana (1655.61 kg/ha yield) with benefit cost ratio 1:4.55, which were found at par with each other.”
t0“soybean”
The same questions in other papers
Metarhizium anisopliae · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Beauveria bassiana · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Akanthomyces lecanii · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Beauveria bassiana · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
biocontrol · Helicoverpa armigera · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.