Paper · 2024 · iMeta

The crop mined phosphorus nutrition via modifying root traits and rhizosphere micro‐food web to meet the increased growth demand under elevated CO 2

Na Zhou; Xue Han; Ning Hu; et al.

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Elevated CO 2 (eCO 2 ) stimulates productivity and nutrient demand of crops. Thus, comprehensively understanding the crop phosphorus (P) acquisition strategy is critical for sustaining agriculture to combat climate changes. Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2 (550 µmol mol −1 ) and ambient CO 2 (aCO 2 , 415 µmol mol −1 ) environments. We assessed the soil P fractions, root morphological and physiological traits and multitrophic microbiota [including arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), alkaline phosphomonoesterase (ALP)‐producing bacteria, protozoa, and bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodes] in the rhizosphere and their trophic interactions at jointing stage of wheat. Compared with aCO 2 , significant 20.2% higher shoot biomass and 26.8% total P accumulation of wheat occurred under eCO 2 . The eCO 2 promoted wheat root length and AMF hyphal biomass, and increased the concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activity, which was accompanied by significant decreases in calcium‐bound inorganic P (Ca‐P i ) (by 16.7%) and moderately labile organic P (by 26.5%) and an increase in available P (by 14.4%) in the rhizosphere soil. The eCO 2 also increased the growth of ALP‐producing bacteria, protozoa, and bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodes in the rhizosphere, governed their diversity and community composition. In addition, the eCO 2 strengthened the trophic interactions of microbiota in rhizosphere; specifically, the eCO 2 promoted the associations between protozoa and ALP‐producing bacteria, between protozoa and AMF, whereas decreased the associations between ALP‐producing bacteria and nematodes. Our findings highlighted the important role of root traits and multitrophic interactions among microbiota in modulating crop P‐acquisition strategies, which could advance our understanding about optimal P management in agriculture systems under global climate changes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat shoot biomass by 20.2% compared with ambient CO2

Treatment
eCO 2e1
Outcome
shoot biomasse2
Direction
highere2
Value
20.2%e2
Comparator
aCO 2e2
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with aCO 2 , significant 20.2% higher shoot biomass and 26.8% total P accumulation of wheat occurred under eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat total P accumulation by 26.8% compared with ambient CO2

Treatment
eCO 2e1
Outcome
total P accumulatione2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
26.8%e2
Comparator
aCO 2e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with aCO 2 , significant 20.2% higher shoot biomass and 26.8% total P accumulation of wheat occurred under eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 promoted wheat root length

Treatment
eCO 2e3
Outcome
root lengthe3
Direction
promotede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e3

“The eCO 2 promoted wheat root length and AMF hyphal biomass, and increased the concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 promoted the hyphal biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in wheat roots

Treatment
eCO 2e3
Interactor
AMFe3symbiont
Outcome
AMF hyphal biomasse3
Direction
promotede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e3

“The eCO 2 promoted wheat root length and AMF hyphal biomass, and increased the concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased organic acid anion concentration and ALP activity in the wheat rhizosphere

Treatment
eCO 2e3
Outcome
concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activitye3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e3

“The eCO 2 promoted wheat root length and AMF hyphal biomass, and increased the concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased calcium-bound inorganic P in the rhizosphere by 16.7%

Treatment
eCO 2e3
Outcome
calcium‐bound inorganic Pe4
Direction
decreasese4
Value
16.7%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e3

“The eCO 2 promoted wheat root length and AMF hyphal biomass, and increased the concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–980 · show in text ↑
e4

“significant decreases in calcium‐bound inorganic P (Ca‐P i ) (by 16.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased moderately labile organic P in the rhizosphere by 26.5%

Treatment
eCO 2e3
Outcome
moderately labile organic Pe5
Direction
decreasese4
Value
26.5%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e3

“The eCO 2 promoted wheat root length and AMF hyphal biomass, and increased the concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–980 · show in text ↑
e4

“significant decreases in calcium‐bound inorganic P (Ca‐P i ) (by 16.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1078 · show in text ↑
e5

“moderately labile organic P (by 26.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased available P in the rhizosphere soil by 14.4%

Treatment
eCO 2e3
Outcome
available Pe6
Direction
increasee6
Value
14.4%e6
Setting
rhizosphere soile6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e3

“The eCO 2 promoted wheat root length and AMF hyphal biomass, and increased the concentration of organic acid anions and the ALP activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–980 · show in text ↑
e6

“an increase in available P (by 14.4%) in the rhizosphere soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased the growth of ALP-producing bacteria, protozoa and nematodes in the rhizosphere

Treatment
eCO 2e7
Interactor
ALP‐producing bacteriae7other
Second interactor
protozoae7other
Outcome
growth of ALP‐producing bacteria, protozoa, and bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodese7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodese7
Setting
rhizospheree7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e7

“The eCO 2 also increased the growth of ALP‐producing bacteria, protozoa, and bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodes in the rhizosphere, governed their diversity and community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 governed the diversity and community composition of rhizosphere microbiota

Treatment
eCO 2e7
Outcome
diversity and community compositione7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e7

“The eCO 2 also increased the growth of ALP‐producing bacteria, protozoa, and bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodes in the rhizosphere, governed their diversity and community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 strengthened the trophic interactions of rhizosphere microbiota

Treatment
eCO 2e2
Outcome
trophic interactions of microbiota in rhizospheree2
Direction
strengthenede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“the eCO 2 strengthened the trophic interactions of microbiota in rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 promoted the association between protozoa and ALP-producing bacteria

Treatment
eCO 2e2
Interactor
protozoae2other
Second interactor
ALP‐producing bacteriae2other
Outcome
associations between protozoa and ALP‐producing bacteriae2
Direction
promotede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“the eCO 2 promoted the associations between protozoa and ALP‐producing bacteria, between protozoa and AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 promoted the association between protozoa and AMF

Treatment
eCO 2e2
Interactor
protozoae2other
Second interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
between protozoa and AMFe2
Direction
promotede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“the eCO 2 promoted the associations between protozoa and ALP‐producing bacteria, between protozoa and AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased the association between ALP-producing bacteria and nematodes

Treatment
eCO 2e2
Interactor
ALP‐producing bacteriae3other
Second interactor
nematodesNematodae3other
Outcome
associations between ALP‐producing bacteria and nematodese3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) was planted in field in the eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“the eCO 2 promoted the associations between protozoa and ALP‐producing bacteria, between protozoa and AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1588 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas decreased the associations between ALP‐producing bacteria and nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1669 · show in text ↑

co2 · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 7 positive, 11 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

63 papers: 23 positive, 40 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

co2 · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 23 positive, 17 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.