Abstract
The corresponding growth-promoting ability of Bacillus velezensis strain S3-1 and Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca strain JD37 was measured and found to have good growth-promoting ability.The two strains were prepared into corresponding liquid fertilizers applied to the soil which the tomatoes were grown in.It shows that the S3-1 treatment group significantly increased the content of soluble sugar,soluble protein,titratable acid and ascorbic acid in tomato fruit.This showed that watering the biological fertilizer S3-1 could effectively improve the quality of tomato fruit.Then,we plated coating of tomato rhizosphere soil.We found that S3-1 was effective in blocking more microorganisms from entering the rhizosphere of plants,especially bacteria.What's more,the rate of change was three times higher than that of the control group.After using S3-1 biological fertilizer,the dry weight and root length of the plants didn't change significantly.The further studies had shown that S3-1 biofertilizer significantly reduces theurease activity of soil.However,it had no significant effect on thesucrase activity of soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
S3-1 significantly increased soluble sugar, soluble protein and titratable acid in tomato fruit.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- S3-1 treatmente0
- Interactor
- S3-1e0symbiont
- Outcome
- content of soluble sugar,soluble protein,titratable acide0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the S3-1 treatment group significantly increased the content of soluble sugar,soluble protein,titratable acid and ascorbic acid in tomato fruit”
e1“three times higher than that of the control group”
Claim · model-written summary
S3-1 significantly increased ascorbic acid in tomato fruit.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- S3-1 treatmente0
- Interactor
- S3-1e0symbiont
- Outcome
- ascorbic acid in tomato fruite0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the S3-1 treatment group significantly increased the content of soluble sugar,soluble protein,titratable acid and ascorbic acid in tomato fruit”
e1“three times higher than that of the control group”
Claim · model-written summary
S3-1 blocked microorganisms, especially bacteria, from entering the tomato rhizosphere.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Interactor
- S3-1e0symbiont
- Outcome
- blocking more microorganisms from entering the rhizosphere of plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“S3-1 was effective in blocking more microorganisms from entering the rhizosphere of plants,especially bacteria”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The reported rate of change under S3-1 was three times higher than control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- S3-1e1
- Interactor
- S3-1e1symbiont
- Outcome
- rate of changee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- three timese0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the rate of change was three times higher than that of the control group”
e1“S3-1 was effective in blocking more microorganisms from entering the rhizosphere of plants”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
S3-1 biofertilizer did not significantly change plant dry weight or root length.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- S3-1 biological fertilizere0
- Interactor
- S3-1e0symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weight and root lengthe0
- Direction
- didn't changee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After using S3-1 biological fertilizer,the dry weight and root length of the plants didn't change significantly”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
S3-1 biofertilizer significantly reduced soil urease activity.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- S3-1 biofertilizere0
- Interactor
- S3-1e0symbiont
- Outcome
- theurease activity of soile0
- Direction
- reducese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“S3-1 biofertilizer significantly reduces theurease activity of soil”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
S3-1 had no significant effect on soil sucrase activity.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- S3-1 biofertilizere1
- Interactor
- S3-1e1symbiont
- Outcome
- thesucrase activity of soile0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it had no significant effect on thesucrase activity of soil”
e1“S3-1 biofertilizer”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 567 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.