Paper · 2008 · BMC Plant Biology

Systemic resistance and lipoxygenase-related defence response induced in tomato by Pseudomonas putidastrain BTP1

Adam Akram; Marc Ongena; Francéline Duby; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed the ability of Pseudomonas putida strain BTP1 to promote induced systemic resistance (ISR) in different host plants. Since ISR is long-lasting and not conducive for development of resistance of the targeted pathogen, this phenomenon can take part of disease control strategies. However, in spite of the numerous examples of ISR induced by PGPR in plants, only a few biochemical studies have associated the protective effect with specific host metabolic changes. RESULTS: In this study, we showed the protective effect of this bacterium in tomato against Botrytis cinerea. Following treatment by P. putida BTP1, analyses of acid-hydrolyzed leaf extracts showed an accumulation of antifungal material after pathogen infection. The fungitoxic compounds thus mainly accumulate as conjugates from which active aglycones may be liberated through the activity of hydrolytic enzymes. These results suggest that strain BTP1 can elicit systemic phytoalexin accumulation in tomato as one defence mechanism. On another hand, we have shown that key enzymes of the lipoxygenase pathway are stimulated in plants treated with the bacteria as compared with control plants. Interestingly, this stimulation is observed only after pathogen challenge in agreement with the priming concept almost invariably associated with the ISR phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Through the demonstration of phytoalexin accumulation and LOX pathway stimulation in tomato, this work provides new insights into the diversity of defence mechanisms that are inducible by non-pathogenic bacteria in the context of ISR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas putida BTP1 protected tomato against Botrytis cinerea.

Treatment
Pseudomonas putidastrain BTP1t0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas putidastrain BTP1t0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protective effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we showed the protective effect of this bacterium in tomato against Botrytis cinerea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pseudomonas putidastrain BTP1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. putida BTP1 treatment was followed by antifungal material accumulation after infection.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
treatment by P. putida BTP1e0
Interactor
P. putida BTP1Pseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antifungal materiale0
Direction
accumulatione0
Qualifier
after pathogen infectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Following treatment by P. putida BTP1, analyses of acid-hydrolyzed leaf extracts showed an accumulation of antifungal material after pathogen infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungitoxic compounds accumulated mainly as conjugates.

Outcome
fungitoxic compoundse0
Direction
accumulatee0
Qualifier
mainly accumulate as conjugatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungitoxic compounds thus mainly accumulate as conjugates from which active aglycones may be liberated through the activity of hydrolytic enzymes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTP1 treatment stimulated key lipoxygenase pathway enzymes compared with controls.

Treatment
treated with the bacteriae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidastrain BTP1t0biocontrol_agent
Gene
key enzymes of the lipoxygenase pathwaye0
Outcome
key enzymes of the lipoxygenase pathwaye0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“key enzymes of the lipoxygenase pathway are stimulated in plants treated with the bacteria as compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Systemic resistance and lipoxygenase-related defence response induced in tomato by Pseudomonas putidastrain BTP1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipoxygenase pathway stimulation occurred only after pathogen challenge.

Outcome
stimulatione0
Qualifier
only after pathogen challengee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this stimulation is observed only after pathogen challenge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas putida · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.