Paper · 2024 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Trait component analysis of lettuce in response to daily light integrals at two growth stages

Hossein Sheikhi; Mojtaba Delshad; Sasan Aliniaeifard; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Little is known about the relative impact of lighting duration and light intensity on lettuce production, as well as whether daily light integrals (DLIs) play a significant role during different plant growth stages. Four DLIs were tested: 8.64, 11.52, 12.96, and 17.28 mol m −2 day −1 as supplemental lighting, which were obtained from a combination of supplemental light intensities at 200 and 300 µmol m −2 day −1 for 12 and 16 h. Sunlight was used as control. A direct correlation was observed between DLIs and yield, total fresh weight, and total dry weight. Under supplemental lighting, relative growth rate (RGR) increased due to an increase in net assimilation rate (NAR) rather than in leaf area ratio (LAR). Plants in the seedling stage were more sensitive to an elevation in DLI than in the head stage. This was confirmed by a greater increase in NAR compared to their corresponding control under the same DLI. Increasing DLI also improved lettuce quality via reducing nitrate and increasing protein content. Higher DLIs (12.96 and 17.28 mol m −2 day −1 ) led to a decrease in maximum quantum yield of photosystem II and an increase in performance index. In conclusion, manipulating RGR through NAR adjustments proved to be more effective than changes in LAR, and adjusting supplemental DLI at each stage was necessary to achieve a larger NAR and, consequently, a larger RGR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DLI correlated directly with yield, total fresh weight and total dry weight.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
DLIse0
Outcome
yield, total fresh weight, and total dry weighte0
Direction
direct correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A direct correlation was observed between DLIs and yield, total fresh weight, and total dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental light raised relative growth rate through net assimilation rate rather than leaf area ratio.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
supplemental lightinge0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increase in net assimilation rate (NAR) rather than in leaf area ratio (LAR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under supplemental lighting, relative growth rate (RGR) increased due to an increase in net assimilation rate (NAR) rather than in leaf area ratio (LAR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings were more sensitive to raised DLI than plants at the head stage.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Outcome
more sensitive to an elevation in DLIe0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
head stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in the seedling stage were more sensitive to an elevation in DLI than in the head stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings had a larger NAR increase against their controls at equal DLI.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
same DLIe0
Outcome
NARe0
Direction
greater increasee0
Comparator
corresponding controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater increase in NAR compared to their corresponding control under the same DLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing DLI reduced nitrate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Increasing DLIe0
Outcome
nitratee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing DLI also improved lettuce quality via reducing nitrate and increasing protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing DLI raised protein content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Increasing DLIe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing DLI also improved lettuce quality via reducing nitrate and increasing protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher DLIs reduced maximum quantum yield of photosystem II.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Higher DLIs (12.96 and 17.28 mol m −2 day −1 )e0
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of photosystem IIe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher DLIs (12.96 and 17.28 mol m −2 day −1 ) led to a decrease in maximum quantum yield of photosystem II and an increase in performance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher DLIs increased performance index.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Higher DLIs (12.96 and 17.28 mol m −2 day −1 )e0
Outcome
performance indexe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher DLIs (12.96 and 17.28 mol m −2 day −1 ) led to a decrease in maximum quantum yield of photosystem II and an increase in performance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adjusting supplemental DLI at each stage to increase NAR and RGR.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
adjusting supplemental DLI at each stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adjusting supplemental DLI at each stage was necessary to achieve a larger NAR and, consequently, a larger RGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 56 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.