Paper · 2024 · Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries

Evaluation of Released Finger Millet Varieties in the East Wollega Zone of Western Oromia for Yields and Acid Soil Tolerance

Mamo Mekonnen; Temesgen Temena; Shiferaw Tadesse; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

On the sub humid regions of western Oromia, many finger millet cultivars were released and produced, but their performance on acid soils was not well researched. A field experiment consisted of two factors (nine finger millet verities and two lime rates, limed and un-limed treatments) were laid out in factorial arrangement, Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The experiment was carried out at three locations (Bako, Diga and Gute) during 2019 and 2020 main cropping seasons to identify and recommend finger millet varieties better performing to acid soils of sub humid areas of western Oromia. The interaction effect of variety by lime for two years over three locations was significant for biomass weight and grain yield. Bako 09 produced significantly the highest mean biomass weight and produced increments of 10% biomass weight and 7% grain yield by application of lime compared to un-limed treatment. At Bako, Kumsa, Bako 09, Boneya and Addis 01 produced significantly the highest biomass weight and grain yield compared to others but not significantly different from each other and produced 4% to 12% yield advantage over all mean grain yield. At Diga and Gute, Bako 09 produced significantly high grain yield. Consequently, application of lime increased finger millet grain yield, soil pH, available P, organic carbon and total nitrogen. Considering higher grain yield, production of Bako 09 under limed condition is recommended for the sub-humid western Oromia. Besides lime application and varietal selection, cropping system managements like rotation, integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers, and split application of fine particle lime to acid soils require further research attention for sustainable crop production in acidic soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The variety by lime interaction over two years and three locations was significant for biomass weight and grain yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
limee1
Outcome
biomass weight and grain yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction effect of variety by lime for two years over three locations was significant for biomass weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bako 09 produced significantly the highest mean biomass weight.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Material
Bako 09e1
Outcome
highest mean biomass weighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bako 09 produced significantly the highest mean biomass weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application increased biomass weight of Bako 09 by 10% compared with un-limed treatment.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of limee1
Outcome
biomass weighte1
Direction
incrementse1
Value
10%e1
Comparator
un-limed treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“produced increments of 10% biomass weight and 7% grain yield by application of lime compared to un-limed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application increased grain yield of Bako 09 by 7% compared with un-limed treatment.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of limee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
incrementse1
Value
7%e1
Comparator
un-limed treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“produced increments of 10% biomass weight and 7% grain yield by application of lime compared to un-limed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–929 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Bako, Kumsa, Bako 09, Boneya and Addis 01 produced significantly the highest biomass weight and grain yield, not significantly different from each other.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Material
Kumsa, Bako 09, Boneya and Addis 01e1
Outcome
highest biomass weight and grain yielde1
Setting
Bakoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Bako, Kumsa, Bako 09, Boneya and Addis 01 produced significantly the highest biomass weight and grain yield compared to others but not significantly different from each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those varieties had a 4% to 12% yield advantage over the all-variety mean grain yield at Bako.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Outcome
yield advantagee1
Value
4% to 12%e1
Comparator
all mean grain yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“produced 4% to 12% yield advantage over all mean grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Diga and Gute, Bako 09 produced significantly high grain yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Material
Bako 09e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Setting
Diga and Gutee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Diga and Gute, Bako 09 produced significantly high grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application increased finger millet grain yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of limee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of lime increased finger millet grain yield, soil pH, available P, organic carbon and total nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application increased soil pH and available P.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of limee1
Outcome
soil pH, available Pe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of lime increased finger millet grain yield, soil pH, available P, organic carbon and total nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application increased soil organic carbon and total nitrogen.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of limee1
Outcome
organic carbon and total nitrogene1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of lime increased finger millet grain yield, soil pH, available P, organic carbon and total nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1368 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Production of Bako 09 under limed condition is recommended for sub-humid western Oromia.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Material
Bako 09e1
Outcome
production of Bako 09 under limed conditione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine finger millet verities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of Bako 09 under limed condition is recommended for the sub-humid western Oromia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1493 · show in text ↑

lime · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

lime · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

lime · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.