Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2016 on sandy loam soil deficient in Boron at College of Agriculture, V. C. Farm, Mandya to study the effect of graded levels of borax and gypsum on growth and yield attributes of irrigated finger millet (Eleusine corocana L.) in Southern Dry Zone of Karnataka. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with fifteen treatments including four levels of borax (5, 10, 15 and 20 kg ha-1), two levels of gypsum (100 and 200 kg ha-1) and their combination along with RDF + FYM and replicated thrice. Results revealed that growth and yield parameters viz., plant height, number of tillers per hill, leaf area index, number of ear heads per meter square and number of fingers per ear head (94.37cm, 6.18, 4.82, 310.67 and 7.61, respectively) were recorded higher in treatment 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12) over RDF + FYM (T1) (80.38cm, 4.93, 3.32, 241.67 and 6.05, respectively). Significantly higher grain yield of 45.95 q ha-1 (17.56% higher over control) and B:C ratio of 3.06 was also recorded in T12 when compared to RDF + FYM (T1). The higher B: C ratio of 3.08 was recorded in treatment T12 (T4 + 100 kg gypsum ha-1) and it was followed by treatment (T4) received 15 kg borax ha-1+ RDF + FYM (3.02)
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
plant height was higher under T12 than RDF + FYM, reaching 94.37cm.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12)e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 94.37cme1
- Comparator
- RDF + FYM (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“higher in treatment 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12) over RDF + FYM (T1)”
e1“plant height, number of tillers per hill, leaf area index, number of ear heads per meter square and number of fingers per ear head (94.37cm, 6.18, 4.82, 310.67 and 7.61, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
number of tillers per hill was higher under T12 than RDF + FYM, reaching 6.18.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12)e0
- Outcome
- number of tillers per hille1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6.18e1
- Comparator
- RDF + FYM (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“higher in treatment 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12) over RDF + FYM (T1)”
e1“plant height, number of tillers per hill, leaf area index, number of ear heads per meter square and number of fingers per ear head (94.37cm, 6.18, 4.82, 310.67 and 7.61, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
leaf area index was higher under T12 than RDF + FYM, reaching 4.82.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12)e0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.82e1
- Comparator
- RDF + FYM (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“higher in treatment 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12) over RDF + FYM (T1)”
e1“plant height, number of tillers per hill, leaf area index, number of ear heads per meter square and number of fingers per ear head (94.37cm, 6.18, 4.82, 310.67 and 7.61, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
number of ear heads per meter square was higher under T12 than RDF + FYM, reaching 310.67.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12)e0
- Outcome
- number of ear heads per meter squaree1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 310.67e1
- Comparator
- RDF + FYM (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“higher in treatment 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12) over RDF + FYM (T1)”
e1“plant height, number of tillers per hill, leaf area index, number of ear heads per meter square and number of fingers per ear head (94.37cm, 6.18, 4.82, 310.67 and 7.61, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
number of fingers per ear head was higher under T12 than RDF + FYM, reaching 7.61.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12)e0
- Outcome
- number of fingers per ear heade1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.61e1
- Comparator
- RDF + FYM (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“higher in treatment 15 kg borax ha-1 +100 kg gypsum ha-1 + RDF + FYM (T12) over RDF + FYM (T1)”
e1“plant height, number of tillers per hill, leaf area index, number of ear heads per meter square and number of fingers per ear head (94.37cm, 6.18, 4.82, 310.67 and 7.61, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave significantly higher grain yield than RDF + FYM, reaching 45.95 q ha-1, 17.56% above control.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- T12e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 45.95 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 17.56% higher over controle0
- Comparator
- RDF + FYM (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“Significantly higher grain yield of 45.95 q ha-1 (17.56% higher over control) and B:C ratio of 3.06 was also recorded in T12 when compared to RDF + FYM (T1)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 had a reported B:C ratio of 3.06 compared with RDF + FYM.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- T12e0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Value
- 3.06e0
- Comparator
- RDF + FYM (T1)e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“B:C ratio of 3.06 was also recorded in T12 when compared to RDF + FYM (T1)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 was reported to have the higher B:C ratio of 3.08, followed by T4 at 3.02.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- T12 (T4 + 100 kg gypsum ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.08e0
- Qualifier
- 3.02e0
- Comparator
- T4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“finger millet (Eleusine Corocana L.)”
e0“The higher B: C ratio of 3.08 was recorded in treatment T12 (T4 + 100 kg gypsum ha-1) and it was followed by treatment (T4) received 15 kg borax ha-1+ RDF + FYM (3.02)”
The same questions in other papers
borax · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
lime · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →lime · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
39 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.