Abstract
The present investigation was carried out at Agricultural Research Farm, in the Department of Horticulture, School of Agriculture, at Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur (Rajasthan) during 2023-24. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design which comprises of nine treatment combinations viz; Control (T0), calcium @ 50 ppm (T1), calcium @ 100 ppm (T2), NAA @ 25 ppm (T3), NAA @ 50 ppm (T4), calcium @ 50 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm (T5), calcium @ 50 ppm + NAA @ 50 ppm (T6), calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm (T7), and calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 50 ppm (T8) treatments were replicated three times. The various concentrations of calcium and NAA had significant effect on various vegetative growth, yield and quality parameters and maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively, minimum (39.13 days) took for 50% flowering, maximum (11.81) fruits per plant, highest (130.68 g) fruit weight, highest (1551.63 g/plant) and (43.10 t/ha) capsicum yield, maximum (131.51 mg/ 100 g) vitamin – C, net return (₹. 4, 02, 291.64/ha) and highest B: C ratio (4.31) were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium and NAA concentrations significantly affected vegetative growth, yield and quality.
- Material
- ‘California Wonder’t0
- Treatment
- various concentrations of calcium and NAAe0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, yield and quality parameterse0
CapsicumNot reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The various concentrations of calcium and NAA had significant effect on various vegetative growth, yield and quality parameters”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum) cv. ‘California Wonder’”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium at 100 ppm plus NAA at 25 ppm produced maximum height of 38.65 cm at 45 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 38.65 cme0
- Qualifier
- 45e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum height of 52.99 cm at 60 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 52.99 cme0
- Qualifier
- 60e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum height of 73.55 cm at 75 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 73.55 cme0
- Qualifier
- 75 DATe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum 8.86 branches per plant at 45 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- branches per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 8.86e0
- Qualifier
- 45e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum 15.53 branches per plant at 60 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- branches per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 15.53e0
- Qualifier
- 60e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum 16.75 branches per plant at 75 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- branches per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 16.75e0
- Qualifier
- 75 DATe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum 47.59 leaves per plant at 45 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- leaves per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 47.59e0
- Qualifier
- 45e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum 92.83 leaves per plant at 60 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- leaves per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 92.83e0
- Qualifier
- 60e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum 102.23 leaves per plant at 75 DAT.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- leaves per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 102.23e0
- Qualifier
- 75 DATe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (38.65 cm), (52.99 cm) and (73.55 cm) plant height, (8.86), (15.53) and (16.75) branches per plant and (47.59), (92.83) and (102.23) leaves per plant at 45, 60 and 75 DAT, respectively”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment minimized time to 50% flowering to 39.13 days.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- 50% floweringe0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 39.13 dayse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum (39.13 days) took for 50% flowering”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment maximized fruits per plant at 11.81.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- fruits per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 11.81e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (11.81) fruits per plant”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave highest fruit weight of 130.68 g.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 130.68 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest (130.68 g) fruit weight”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave highest yield of 1551.63 g/plant.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- capsicum yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1551.63 g/plante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest (1551.63 g/plant) and (43.10 t/ha) capsicum yield”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave highest yield of 43.10 t/ha.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- capsicum yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 43.10 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest (1551.63 g/plant) and (43.10 t/ha) capsicum yield”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment maximized vitamin C at 131.51 mg/100 g as reported.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme1
- Outcome
- vitamin – Ce0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 131.51 mg/ 100 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum (131.51 mg/ 100 g) vitamin – C”
e1“were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
t0“Capsicum (Capsicum annuum var. grossum)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment yielded net return of ₹. 4, 02, 291.64/ha.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Value
- ₹. 4, 02, 291.64/hae0
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“net return (₹. 4, 02, 291.64/ha) and highest B: C ratio (4.31) were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave highest benefit-cost ratio of 4.31.
- Treatment
- foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppme0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.31e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“net return (₹. 4, 02, 291.64/ha) and highest B: C ratio (4.31) were recorded under foliar application of calcium @ 100 ppm + NAA @ 25 ppm treatment.”
The same questions in other papers
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →calcium atom · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
calcium atom · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · phenology · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
28 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →application · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →application · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.