Paper · 2021 · Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal Journal of Suboptimal Lands

Effect of Fermentation Extracts against Bemisia tabaci on Chilli Pepper (Capsicum annuum)

Rudi Putra Munandar; Suwandi Suwandi

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This experiment was aimed to determine the effects of application of fermentation extracts on the development of pepper yellow leaf curl and whitefly on chilli. Experiment arranged in a completely randomized block design with four treatments (water as control, fermentations extracts named TSNGlu, BP4, and BP4Glu). The results showed symptoms in the form of curling of young leaves. The color of the leaves was relatively green. Yellow symptoms commonly found when severe were not found in the experiment. The symptoms of severe disease are marked in yellow at the top of the leaf and remain green at the bottom. The laboratory used 350 lux (underexposed light) so the symptoms become slight. ack of light intensity made plants etiolated and could not carry out photosynthesis properly. Each experiment consisted of 4 fermentation extract treatments. Each treatment. Overall, all treatments without fermentation and also AUDPC of the disease did not significantly affect the treatment of fermented extract both the incidence and severity of the low pepper yellow leaf curl virus. The treatment by spraying did not significantly affect the population of whitefly, except at 7 days after infestation, inversely proportional to the spraying treatment by means of discharge significantly affected from 14 days after infestation. The increase in plant height spray treatment did not have a significant effect and for spraying treatment with extraction of fermentation did not significantly affect the canopy area of ​​the plant canopy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young chilli leaves curled while severe yellow symptoms were absent.

Taxon
chillie2
Outcome
curling of young leavese0

Verbatim

e0

“symptoms in the form of curling of young leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yellow symptoms commonly found when severe were not found in the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“on chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation extract did not significantly affect disease incidence or severity.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
fermented extracte0
Interactor
pepper yellow leaf curl virusPepper yellow leaf curl viruse0pathogen
Outcome
incidence and severity of the low pepper yellow leaf curl viruse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“did not significantly affect the treatment of fermented extract both the incidence and severity of the low pepper yellow leaf curl virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“on chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying did not significantly affect whitefly population except seven days after infestation.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
sprayinge0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
population of whiteflye0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
except at 7 days after infestatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“spraying did not significantly affect the population of whitefly, except at 7 days after infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1198 · show in text ↑
e1

“on chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The discharge spraying treatment significantly affected whitefly population from 14 days after infestation.

Taxon
chillie2
Treatment
spraying treatment by means of dischargee0
Interactor
whiteflye1pest
Outcome
population of whiteflye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“spraying treatment by means of discharge significantly affected from 14 days after infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1324 · show in text ↑
e1

“population of whitefly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1162 · show in text ↑
e2

“on chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying had no significant effect on plant height increase.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
spray treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
did not have a significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase in plant height spray treatment did not have a significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“on chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation extract spraying did not significantly affect canopy area.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
spraying treatment with extraction of fermentatione0
Outcome
canopy areae0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“spraying treatment with extraction of fermentation did not significantly affect the canopy area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1508 · show in text ↑
e1

“on chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–159 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.