Abstract
Reduced sensitivity to demethylation inhibitor (DMI) and quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides in Nothopassalora personata, the cause of late leaf spot of peanut (Arachis hypogaea), complicates management of this disease in the Southeastern United States. Mixtures with protectant fungicides may help preserve the use of members of both DMI and QoI fungicide groups for leaf spot management. Field experiments were conducted in Tifton, GA, from 2019 to 2021 and in Plains, GA, during 2019 and 2020. The primary objective was to determine the effects of mixtures of DMI fungicides tebuconazole and mefentrifluconazole and QoI fungicides azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin with micronized elemental sulfur on late leaf spot in fields with populations of N. personata with suspected reduced sensitivity to DMI and QoI fungicides. In four of the experiments, the efficacies of elemental sulfur and chlorothalonil as mixing partners were also compared. In most cases, standardized area under the disease progress curve (sAUDPC) and final percentage defoliation were less for all DMI and QoI fungicides mixed with sulfur or chlorothalonil than for the respective fungicides alone. In most cases, sAUDPC and final percentage defoliation were similar for sulfur and chlorothalonil when mixed with the respective DMI or QoI fungicide. These results indicate that mixtures of DMI or QoI fungicides with either micronized sulfur or chlorothalonil can improve control of late leaf spot compared with the DMI or QoI fungicide alone. These results also indicate that elemental sulfur has potential as an alternative to chlorothalonil in tank mixes where that protectant fungicide is currently being used as a mixing partner to improve leaf spot control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Most DMI and QoI mixtures with sulfur or chlorothalonil reduced disease progress relative to the fungicides alone.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- DMI and QoI fungicides mixed with sulfur or chlorothalonile0
- Outcome
- standardized area under the disease progress curve (sAUDPC)e0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- respective fungicides alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In most cases, standardized area under the disease progress curve (sAUDPC) and final percentage defoliation were less for all DMI and QoI fungicides mixed with sulfur or chlorothalonil than for the respective fungicides alone.”
t0“Late Leaf Spot of Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Most DMI and QoI mixtures with sulfur or chlorothalonil reduced final defoliation relative to fungicides alone.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- DMI and QoI fungicides mixed with sulfur or chlorothalonile0
- Outcome
- final percentage defoliatione0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- respective fungicides alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In most cases, standardized area under the disease progress curve (sAUDPC) and final percentage defoliation were less for all DMI and QoI fungicides mixed with sulfur or chlorothalonil than for the respective fungicides alone.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Disease progress was generally similar with sulfur and chlorothalonil as mixing partners.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- sulfure0
- Outcome
- sAUDPCe0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- chlorothalonile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In most cases, sAUDPC and final percentage defoliation were similar for sulfur and chlorothalonil when mixed with the respective DMI or QoI fungicide.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Final defoliation was generally similar with sulfur and chlorothalonil as mixing partners.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- sulfure0
- Outcome
- final percentage defoliatione0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- chlorothalonile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In most cases, sAUDPC and final percentage defoliation were similar for sulfur and chlorothalonil when mixed with the respective DMI or QoI fungicide.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identified elemental sulfur as a possible alternative to chlorothalonil in tank mixes.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- elemental sulfur has potential as an alternative to chlorothalonil in tank mixese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“elemental sulfur has potential as an alternative to chlorothalonil in tank mixes where that protectant fungicide is currently being used as a mixing partner to improve leaf spot control.”
t0“Peanut”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
chlorothalonil · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
chlorothalonil · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fungicide · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fungicide · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.