Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Optimizing Wheat Planting Density by Adjusting Population Structure and Stabilizing Stem Strength to Achieve High and Stable Yields

Suwei Feng; Chenchen Shi; Peiyu Wang; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increasing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) planting density is the most effective production management method for increasing yields; however, excessive crop populations under high planting densities may experience elevated risk of stem lodging. We conducted this study to assess the relationship between reduced lodging and increased yield, investigate the effects of planting density on wheat population structure, stem strength, and material transport, and provide a basis for rationale planting densities. The experiments were carried out using a split-plot design with three replicates. The main plots contained two wheat varieties: Bainong 5819 (BN5819) and Bainong 4199 (BN4199), and the sub-plots contained four planting density treatments: 90 × 104 plants/ha (D1), 180 × 104 plants/ha (D2), 270 × 104 plants/ha (D3), and 360 × 104 plants/ha (D4). A two-year field trial was conducted in 2021–2023. The relationships between population structure characteristics, changes in stem strength, activation, and retransport of stem material after anthesis, and achievement of high and stable yields were investigated at the different planting densities. When the planting density of wheat increased from D1 to D4 treatment, the activity of fructan hydrolase was significantly increased. Compared with D1 treatment, the highest activity of fructan hydrolase was increased by 457.47 μg/h/g under D4 treatment. At the same time, the increase of density also increased the contribution rate of dry matter accumulation (CDMA) to grain after anthesis increased, with the highest increase in CDMA at 33.67%, which significantly reduced stem strength. Correlation analysis revealed a significant negative association between CDMA and stem strength. Specifically, CDMA levels were significantly lower with the D3 treatment than the D4 treatment, while stem strength remained higher after anthesis as an adaptive response to mitigate lodging risk. Stem storage compounds can promote grain filling and a weight increase in inferior grains. The number of spikes per unit area increased significantly with increasing planting density, but the number of grains per spike and 1000-grain weight decreased significantly. In two years, the number of spikes in D3 treatment increased by a maximum of 211.67 × 104 ha−1 and 99.17 × 104 ha−1, respectively, compared to D1 and D2 treatments. The number of grains per spike was significantly higher than that of D4 treatment, the highest being 3.68 grains. Therefore, in the North China Plain with suitable water, fertilizer, and temperature, the sowing density of 270 × 104 plants/ha established population structure, significantly reduced CDMA, maintained post-anthesis stem strength, enhanced resilience of stems against post-anthesis lodging, and resulted in high yields by stabilizing the number of grains per spike and increasing the number of wheat spikes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructan hydrolase activity in wheat increased significantly as planting density rose from D1 to D4.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
activity of fructan hydrolasee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
D1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the planting density of wheat increased from D1 to D4 treatment, the activity of fructan hydrolase was significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest fructan hydrolase activity under D4 was 457.47 μg/h/g higher than under D1.

Treatment
D4 treatmente1
Outcome
activity of fructan hydrolasee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
457.47 μg/h/ge1
Comparator
D1 treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with D1 treatment, the highest activity of fructan hydrolase was increased by 457.47 μg/h/g under D4 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density increased the contribution rate of dry matter accumulation to grain after anthesis (CDMA), with a highest increase of 33.67%.

Treatment
increase of densitye2
Outcome
contribution rate of dry matter accumulation (CDMA) to grain after anthesise2
Direction
increasede2
Value
33.67%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e2

“the increase of density also increased the contribution rate of dry matter accumulation (CDMA) to grain after anthesis increased, with the highest increase in CDMA at 33.67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The density-driven increase in CDMA significantly reduced stem strength.

Treatment
increase of densitye3
Outcome
stem strengthe4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e3

“the increase of density also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1462 · show in text ↑
e4

“which significantly reduced stem strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1640 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CDMA and stem strength showed a significant negative association.

Organ / stage
steme5
Outcome
association between CDMA and stem strengthe5
Direction
negativee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e5

“Correlation analysis revealed a significant negative association between CDMA and stem strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CDMA was significantly lower under D3 than under D4.

Treatment
D3 treatmente6
Outcome
CDMA levelse6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
D4 treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e6

“CDMA levels were significantly lower with the D3 treatment than the D4 treatment, while stem strength remained higher after anthesis as an adaptive response to mitigate lodging risk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem strength remained higher after anthesis under D3 than D4, as an adaptive response to mitigate lodging risk.

Treatment
D3 treatmente6
Outcome
stem strengthe6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
D4 treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e6

“CDMA levels were significantly lower with the D3 treatment than the D4 treatment, while stem strength remained higher after anthesis as an adaptive response to mitigate lodging risk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1934 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem storage compounds can promote grain filling and weight increase in inferior grains.

Compound
Stem storage compoundse7
Outcome
grain filling and a weight increase in inferior grainse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e7

“Stem storage compounds can promote grain filling and a weight increase in inferior grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of spikes per unit area increased significantly with increasing planting density.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
number of spikes per unit areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of spikes per unit area increased significantly with increasing planting density, but the number of grains per spike and 1000-grain weight decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of grains per spike and 1000-grain weight decreased significantly with increasing planting density.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
number of grains per spike and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of spikes per unit area increased significantly with increasing planting density, but the number of grains per spike and 1000-grain weight decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over two years, spikes in D3 increased by a maximum of 211.67 × 104 ha−1 compared with D1.

Treatment
D3 treatmente0
Outcome
number of spikese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
211.67 × 104 ha−1e0
Comparator
D1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two years, the number of spikes in D3 treatment increased by a maximum of 211.67 × 104 ha−1 and 99.17 × 104 ha−1, respectively, compared to D1 and D2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2202–2365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over two years, spikes in D3 increased by a maximum of 99.17 × 104 ha−1 compared with D2.

Treatment
D3 treatmente0
Outcome
number of spikese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
99.17 × 104 ha−1e0
Comparator
D2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two years, the number of spikes in D3 treatment increased by a maximum of 211.67 × 104 ha−1 and 99.17 × 104 ha−1, respectively, compared to D1 and D2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2202–2365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of grains per spike was significantly higher than under D4, the highest difference being 3.68 grains.

Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.68 grainse0
Comparator
D4 treatmente0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of grains per spike was significantly higher than that of D4 treatment, the highest being 3.68 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2367–2479 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

In the North China Plain, a sowing density of 270 × 104 plants/ha is recommended for wheat to maintain stem strength and obtain high yields.

Outcome
sowing density of 270 × 104 plants/hae0
Setting
North China Plaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the North China Plain with suitable water, fertilizer, and temperature, the sowing density of 270 × 104 plants/ha established population structure, significantly reduced CDMA, maintained post-anthesis stem strength, enhanced resilience of stems against post-anthesis lodging, and resulted in high yields by stabilizing the number of grains per spike and increasing the number of wheat spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2492–2886 · show in text ↑

density · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.