Paper · 2024 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Algal and nanoparticles of silicon and boron foliar application efficiency for maximizing yield, and quality traits of two faba bean varieties

Asmaa A. Mohamed; Mamdouh A. Eissa; Bahy R. Bakheit

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of nanotechnology as a fertilizer has been suggested in various researches as a tool for promoting progressive nutrients use efficiency, lessening nutrients losses through water irrigation and volatilization and enhancing crop yield stability. This experiment was carried out in the two growing winter seasons i.e., 2021/2022 and 2022/2023, aimed to Enhance the flowering and yield of faba bean (Vicai faba) by foliar application of algal Spirulina platensis and nanoparticles of silicon and boron to reduce flower drop, increase the number of flowers on the plant, and increase yields. A modified amount of Spirulina at a rate of 2.0 gL-1, silicon nanoparticles at a rate of 100 ppm L-1, and Boron nanoparticles at a rate of 100 ppm L-1 either individually or combined each other on two faba bean (Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3) Cultivars by using Strips-Block design in three replications. Results indicated that the foliar spraying separately or combined increased the N, P, K, Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3 compared to the control. All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons. The results, indicate that spraying with Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+B gave highest values for a number of flowering, pod weight, seed, biological, and protein yields of the two faba bean varieties. The seed yield was positively correlated with all studied traits under all treatment combinations

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays increased leaf N, P and K contents against control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
foliar spraying separately or combinede0
Outcome
N, P, Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spraying separately or combined increased the N, P, K, Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3 compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays increased leaf Ca, carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents against control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
foliar spraying separately or combinede0
Outcome
Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spraying separately or combined increased the N, P, K, Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3 compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar treatments decreased shredded flowers against control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
All foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
shredded flowerse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar treatments increased set pods against control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
All foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
setted podse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar treatments increased biological and seed yields against control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
All foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
biological and seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cultivars did not differ significantly in the two seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
two cultivarse0
Outcome
differencee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sp+Si, Sp+B and Sp+Si+B gave the highest flowering number and pod weight.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+Be0
Outcome
number of flowering, pod weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+B gave highest values for a number of flowering, pod weight, seed, biological, and protein yields of the two faba bean varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sp+Si, Sp+B and Sp+Si+B gave the highest seed, biological and protein yields.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+Be0
Outcome
seed, biological, and protein yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+B gave highest values for a number of flowering, pod weight, seed, biological, and protein yields of the two faba bean varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1522 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield was positively correlated with all studied traits under all treatment combinations.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
all treatment combinationse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed yield was positively correlated with all studied traits under all treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · phenology · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.