Abstract
The use of nanotechnology as a fertilizer has been suggested in various researches as a tool for promoting progressive nutrients use efficiency, lessening nutrients losses through water irrigation and volatilization and enhancing crop yield stability. This experiment was carried out in the two growing winter seasons i.e., 2021/2022 and 2022/2023, aimed to Enhance the flowering and yield of faba bean (Vicai faba) by foliar application of algal Spirulina platensis and nanoparticles of silicon and boron to reduce flower drop, increase the number of flowers on the plant, and increase yields. A modified amount of Spirulina at a rate of 2.0 gL-1, silicon nanoparticles at a rate of 100 ppm L-1, and Boron nanoparticles at a rate of 100 ppm L-1 either individually or combined each other on two faba bean (Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3) Cultivars by using Strips-Block design in three replications. Results indicated that the foliar spraying separately or combined increased the N, P, K, Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3 compared to the control. All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons. The results, indicate that spraying with Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+B gave highest values for a number of flowering, pod weight, seed, biological, and protein yields of the two faba bean varieties. The seed yield was positively correlated with all studied traits under all treatment combinations
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar sprays increased leaf N, P and K contents against control.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- foliar spraying separately or combinede0
- Outcome
- N, P, Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“foliar spraying separately or combined increased the N, P, K, Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3 compared to the control.”
t0“faba bean varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar sprays increased leaf Ca, carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents against control.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- foliar spraying separately or combinede0
- Outcome
- Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“foliar spraying separately or combined increased the N, P, K, Ca, total carbohydrate and chlorophyll contents in the leaves of Nubaria-1 and Sakha-3 compared to the control.”
t0“faba bean varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar treatments decreased shredded flowers against control.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- All foliar treatmentse0
- Outcome
- shredded flowerse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”
t0“faba bean varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar treatments increased set pods against control.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- All foliar treatmentse0
- Outcome
- setted podse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”
t0“faba bean varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar treatments increased biological and seed yields against control.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- All foliar treatmentse0
- Outcome
- biological and seed yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All foliar treatments decreased the shredded flowers consequently increasing the setted pods, and increased the biological and seed yields compared to the control with nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”
t0“faba bean varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
The two cultivars did not differ significantly in the two seasons.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Material
- two cultivarse0
- Outcome
- differencee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“nonsignificant difference between the two cultivars in two seasons.”
t0“faba bean varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Sp+Si, Sp+B and Sp+Si+B gave the highest flowering number and pod weight.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+Be0
- Outcome
- number of flowering, pod weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“spraying with Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+B gave highest values for a number of flowering, pod weight, seed, biological, and protein yields of the two faba bean varieties.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sp+Si, Sp+B and Sp+Si+B gave the highest seed, biological and protein yields.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+Be0
- Outcome
- seed, biological, and protein yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“spraying with Sp+Si, Sp+B, and Sp+Si+B gave highest values for a number of flowering, pod weight, seed, biological, and protein yields of the two faba bean varieties.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield was positively correlated with all studied traits under all treatment combinations.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- all treatment combinationse0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- positively correlatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The seed yield was positively correlated with all studied traits under all treatment combinations”
t0“faba bean varieties”
The same questions in other papers
silicon atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · phenology · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
application · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →application · physiology: pigments · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
22 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.