Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Silicon Foliar Application and Sowing Dates on Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Productivity under New Valley Conditions –Egypt.

H. Shoman; A. Bughdady

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the experimental station farm ofDesert Research Center (D.R.C.) at EL-Kharga Oasis, New Valley Governorate, during2018/ 2019 and 2019/ 2020 growing seasons, to study the effect of sowing dates and silicon foliar application on productivity of faba bean under New Valley conditions.Results revealed that number of pods plant-1, seed yield plant-1, 100 seed weight, harvest index, shelling and seed yield were higher with planting on 15th Oct in both seasons. While, plant height, pod length, straw yield, WUE and seed carbohydrates content were higher with planting on 1st Oct in both seasons. Raising silicon foliar application levels up to 300 ppm led to a significant increase in all studied parameters except, pod length in both seasons. The interaction between sowing dates and silicon foliar application levels had significant effects on all studied characters except, pod length. The highest values of yield and its components were performed when faba bean had sown on 15th Oct with spraying of 300 ppm silicon in the form potassium silicate to obtain the highest possible productivity under New Valley conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 15 October gave higher pod number, seed yield per plant and 100 seed weight in both seasons.

Treatment
planting on 15th Octe0
Outcome
number of pods plant-1, seed yield plant-1, 100 seed weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods plant-1, seed yield plant-1, 100 seed weight, harvest index, shelling and seed yield were higher with planting on 15th Oct in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 15 October gave higher harvest index, shelling and seed yield in both seasons.

Treatment
planting on 15th Octe0
Outcome
harvest index, shelling and seed yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index, shelling and seed yield were higher with planting on 15th Oct in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 1 October gave higher plant height, pod length and straw yield in both seasons.

Treatment
planting on 1st Octe0
Outcome
plant height, pod length, straw yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, pod length, straw yield, WUE and seed carbohydrates content were higher with planting on 1st Oct in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 1 October gave higher water use efficiency and seed carbohydrate content in both seasons.

Treatment
planting on 1st Octe0
Outcome
WUE and seed carbohydrates contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“WUE and seed carbohydrates content were higher with planting on 1st Oct in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing foliar silicon to 300 ppm significantly increased studied parameters except pod length.

Treatment
silicon foliar application levels up to 300 ppme0
Outcome
all studied parameters except, pod lengthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Raising silicon foliar application levels up to 300 ppm led to a significant increase in all studied parameters except, pod length in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–775 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date and foliar silicon interacted significantly for all studied characters except pod length.

Treatment
sowing dates and silicon foliar application levelse0
Outcome
all studied characters except, pod lengthe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between sowing dates and silicon foliar application levels had significant effects on all studied characters except, pod length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 15 October with 300 ppm potassium silicate spray gave the highest yield and yield components.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
sown on 15th Oct with spraying of 300 ppm silicon in the form potassium silicatee0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of yield and its components were performed when faba bean had sown on 15th Oct with spraying of 300 ppm silicon in the form potassium silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1083 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

potassium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.