Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Wheat Response to Foliar-Applied Phosphorus Is Determined by Soil Phosphorus Buffering

Raj Malik; Craig Scanlan; Andrew van Burgel; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In no-till cropping systems, banding of phosphorus (P) fertiliser at seeding results in low use efficiency due to chemical reactions in soil. Foliar P has the potential to allow grain producers to respond tactically with P application after sowing when P supply from soil and fertiliser is not meeting crop demand. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of foliar P on wheat grain yield, grain quality, biomass yield, P uptake and P use efficiency indices. Nine field experiments were conducted to investigate the response of wheat to foliar P. Three rates of P, 0, 2.5 and 5.0 kg/ha, as phosphoric acid (H3PO4 85%) were applied to wheat at three different growth stages: first tiller emergence (Z21), first node detection (Z31) and flag leaf emergence (Z39). Grain yield responses ranging from 176 kg/ha to 505 kg/ha to foliar-applied P were observed in six out of nine experiments. The percent grain yield response to foliar P was negatively related to the P buffering index (PBI, 0–10 cm soil depth), which is attributed to greater sorption by soil of the foliar P at the higher PBI levels. Mean agronomic efficiency (AE) across the experiments was 111 kg/kg P but reached up to 232 kg/kg P. It was also evident that foliar P has the potential to improve P concentration in shoots and grains and increase P uptake but with no or minimal effect on grain quality. Our results suggest that a combination of tissue testing at the seedling stage and soil P buffering can be used to guide when foliar P application is likely to increase grain yield in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus increased wheat grain yield by 176–505 kg/ha in six of nine experiments.

Treatment
foliar-applied Pe0
Outcome
Grain yield responsese0
Value
176 kg/ha to 505 kg/hae0
Qualifier
six out of nine experimentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield responses ranging from 176 kg/ha to 505 kg/ha to foliar-applied P were observed in six out of nine experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent grain-yield response to foliar phosphorus was negatively related to soil phosphorus buffering index.

Treatment
foliar Pe0
Outcome
percent grain yield responsee0
Direction
negatively relatede0
Qualifier
P buffering index (PBI, 0–10 cm soil depth)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent grain yield response to foliar P was negatively related to the P buffering index (PBI, 0–10 cm soil depth)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean agronomic efficiency of foliar phosphorus across experiments was 111 kg/kg P.

Outcome
agronomic efficiency (AE)e0
Value
111 kg/kg Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean agronomic efficiency (AE) across the experiments was 111 kg/kg P but reached up to 232 kg/kg P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic efficiency reached up to 232 kg/kg P.

Outcome
agronomic efficiency (AE)e0
Direction
reached up toe0
Value
232 kg/kg Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean agronomic efficiency (AE) across the experiments was 111 kg/kg P but reached up to 232 kg/kg P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus had potential to improve phosphorus concentration in wheat shoots.

Treatment
foliar Pe0
Outcome
P concentration in shootse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar P has the potential to improve P concentration in shoots and grains and increase P uptake but with no or minimal effect on grain quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus had potential to improve phosphorus concentration in wheat grains.

Treatment
foliar Pe0
Outcome
P concentration in shoots and grainse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar P has the potential to improve P concentration in shoots and grains and increase P uptake but with no or minimal effect on grain quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus had potential to increase wheat phosphorus uptake.

Treatment
foliar Pe0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar P has the potential to improve P concentration in shoots and grains and increase P uptake but with no or minimal effect on grain quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus had no or minimal effect on wheat grain quality.

Treatment
foliar Pe0
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
no or minimal effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar P has the potential to improve P concentration in shoots and grains and increase P uptake but with no or minimal effect on grain quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“response of wheat to foliar P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–566 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested seedling tissue testing and soil phosphorus buffering to guide foliar phosphorus timing for wheat yield gains.

Outcome
guide when foliar P application is likely to increase grain yielde0
Qualifier
tissue testing at the seedling stage and soil P bufferinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of tissue testing at the seedling stage and soil P buffering can be used to guide when foliar P application is likely to increase grain yield in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1578 · show in text ↑

application · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased common wheat test weight by 1.4%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.