Paper · 2024 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira

Fusarium graminearum infection during the reproductive stages of closed-flowering barley, grain deoxynivalenol contamination, and response to fungicide application

Lorrant Cavanha Gabriel; Paula Cristina dos Santos Rodrigues; Priscila Angelotti-Zampar; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this work was to investigate the influence of the reproductive stage of closed-flowering barley on Fusarium graminearum infection and to evaluate the efficacy of pre-inoculation fungicide application in controlling Fusarium head blight (FHB) and reducing grain contamination with the deoxynivalenol (DON) mycotoxin. Two experiments, in a completely randomized design with eight replicates, were conducted in a growth chamber at different temperatures. The statistical analysis was nonparametric, using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Potted plants of the BRS BRAU barley cultivar were inoculated by spraying a conidial suspension at the following three reproductive stages: anthesis halfway, grain at medium milk, and soft dough. The tebuconazole fungicide was sprayed 48 hours before pathogen inoculation. The FHB symptoms caused by the inoculation with F. graminearum at the medium milk stage are fully visible, although fungicide application before pathogen inoculation controls the disease, but mild at the anthesis halfway and soft dough stages. Inoculation at the three stages results in grain contamination with DON, which is reduced by pre-inoculation fungicide application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium symptoms at medium milk were fully visible, whereas they were mild at anthesis halfway and soft dough.

Treatment
inoculation with F. graminearum at the medium milk stagee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
FHB symptomse0
Comparator
anthesis halfway and soft dough stagese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The FHB symptoms caused by the inoculation with F. graminearum at the medium milk stage are fully visible, although fungicide application before pathogen inoculation controls the disease, but mild at the anthesis halfway and soft dough stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide applied before pathogen inoculation controlled Fusarium head blight.

Treatment
fungicide application before pathogen inoculatione0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
the diseasee0
Direction
controlse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide application before pathogen inoculation controls the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum infection during the reproductive stages of closed-flowering barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation at each of the three reproductive stages contaminated barley grain with DON.

Treatment
Inoculation at the three stagese0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
grain contamination with DONe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation at the three stages results in grain contamination with DON, which is reduced by pre-inoculation fungicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum infection during the reproductive stages of closed-flowering barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-inoculation fungicide application reduced grain DON contamination.

Treatment
pre-inoculation fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
grain contamination with DONe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain contamination with DON, which is reduced by pre-inoculation fungicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum infection during the reproductive stages of closed-flowering barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑

Fusarium graminearum · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium graminearum · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

in vitro · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 24 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fungicide · Fusarium graminearum · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.