Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Agronomy

Benefits of Canavalia ensiformis, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and mineral fertilizer management in tobacco production

Daniel Ponce de Leon; Milagros Garcia Rubido; Ramón Rivera; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) has long been vital to Cuban agriculture, with its products renowned for their quality. Cuban tobacco is grown in soils with a long history of continuous farming using traditional fertilization methods characterized by recommended doses of mineral fertilizers. This study aims to improve the nutrition resource strategy in tobacco cultivation to ensure high yields of superior-grade tobacco leaves with adequate quality and increase fertilization efficiency. With this goal, a field experiment evaluated the traditional method of fallow with alternatives of nutrient supply systems for the production of black tobacco in Ultic Paleustalf soils. The experiment utilized Canavalia ensiformis (Can) treated with a mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF) based on the Glomus cubense strain (INCAM-4) as a preceding green manure, combined with successive mineral fertilizations for tobacco during four growing seasons in a randomized block design with factorial arrangement. Canavalia presented a positive response to mycorrhizal inoculation, significantly increasing dry biomass production (87.34%, 129.96%), mycorrhizal colonization (26.90%, 103.66%), and spore production (26.79%, 52.52%) for Can and Can+AMF treatments respectively. A biplot analysis established a strong relationship between the biomass and mycorrhizal performance of Canavalia and the growth, yield, and mycorrhizal colonization of tobacco. The results indicate that inoculated Canavalia enhances mycorrhizal performance in successional tobacco, with Can+AMF significantly increasing mycorrhization of tobacco roots by (110.06%). Moreover, the combination of Can inoculate with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dose consistently produced the highest tobacco yields (42.06%), growth, and mycorrhizal activity across the four years while maintaining satisfactory combustibility. In this nutrition supply system, variations of the recommended fertilizer dose significantly decreased the percentage of mycorrhizal colonization. After four growing seasons using Can + AMF and Canavalia without inoculations, soil organic matter, and availability of exchangeable calcium, magnesium, and pH increased slightly without decreasing available phosphorus and potassium contents. Consequently, we conclude that Canavalia ensiformis , with an inoculum based on the Glomus cubense strain and 75% of the recommended dose of mineral fertilizers, provides an enhanced nutrition alternative system for black tobacco production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation of Canavalia increased its dry biomass by 87.34%.

Taxon
Canavalia ensiformisCanavalia ensiformise2
Treatment
Cane1
Interactor
Glomus cubenseGlomus cubensee2symbiont
Outcome
dry biomass productione1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
87.34%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increasing dry biomass production (87.34%, 129.96%), mycorrhizal colonization (26.90%, 103.66%), and spore production (26.79%, 52.52%) for Can and Can+AMF treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1249 · show in text ↑
e2

“Canavalia ensiformis (Can) treated with a mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF) based on the Glomus cubense strain (INCAM-4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation of Canavalia (Can+AMF) increased its dry biomass by 129.96%.

Taxon
Canavalia ensiformisCanavalia ensiformise2
Treatment
Can+AMFe1
Interactor
Glomus cubenseGlomus cubensee2symbiont
Outcome
dry biomass productione1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
129.96%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increasing dry biomass production (87.34%, 129.96%), mycorrhizal colonization (26.90%, 103.66%), and spore production (26.79%, 52.52%) for Can and Can+AMF treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1249 · show in text ↑
e2

“Canavalia ensiformis (Can) treated with a mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF) based on the Glomus cubense strain (INCAM-4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization of Canavalia roots increased by 26.90% with Can treatment.

Taxon
Canavalia ensiformisCanavalia ensiformise2
Treatment
Cane1
Interactor
Glomus cubenseGlomus cubensee2symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
26.90%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increasing dry biomass production (87.34%, 129.96%), mycorrhizal colonization (26.90%, 103.66%), and spore production (26.79%, 52.52%) for Can and Can+AMF treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1249 · show in text ↑
e2

“Canavalia ensiformis (Can) treated with a mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF) based on the Glomus cubense strain (INCAM-4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization of Canavalia increased by 103.66% with Can+AMF treatment.

Taxon
Canavalia ensiformisCanavalia ensiformise2
Treatment
Can+AMFe1
Interactor
Glomus cubenseGlomus cubensee2symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
103.66%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increasing dry biomass production (87.34%, 129.96%), mycorrhizal colonization (26.90%, 103.66%), and spore production (26.79%, 52.52%) for Can and Can+AMF treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1249 · show in text ↑
e2

“Canavalia ensiformis (Can) treated with a mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF) based on the Glomus cubense strain (INCAM-4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore production of Glomus cubense rose by 26.79% in Canavalia with Can treatment.

Taxon
Canavalia ensiformisCanavalia ensiformise2
Treatment
Cane1
Interactor
Glomus cubenseGlomus cubensee2symbiont
Outcome
spore productione1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
26.79%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increasing dry biomass production (87.34%, 129.96%), mycorrhizal colonization (26.90%, 103.66%), and spore production (26.79%, 52.52%) for Can and Can+AMF treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1249 · show in text ↑
e2

“Canavalia ensiformis (Can) treated with a mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF) based on the Glomus cubense strain (INCAM-4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore production of Glomus cubense rose by 52.52% in Canavalia with Can+AMF treatment.

Taxon
Canavalia ensiformisCanavalia ensiformise2
Treatment
Can+AMFe1
Interactor
Glomus cubenseGlomus cubensee2symbiont
Outcome
spore productione1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
52.52%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increasing dry biomass production (87.34%, 129.96%), mycorrhizal colonization (26.90%, 103.66%), and spore production (26.79%, 52.52%) for Can and Can+AMF treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1249 · show in text ↑
e2

“Canavalia ensiformis (Can) treated with a mycorrhizal inoculum (AMF) based on the Glomus cubense strain (INCAM-4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–814 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass and mycorrhizal performance of Canavalia have a strong relationship with growth, yield and mycorrhizal colonization of tobacco.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
biomass and mycorrhizal performance of Canavaliae4
Outcome
growth, yield, and mycorrhizal colonization of tobaccoe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e4

“A biplot analysis established a strong relationship between the biomass and mycorrhizal performance of Canavalia and the growth, yield, and mycorrhizal colonization of tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield was highest with Can inoculated with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dose, at 42.06%.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
Can inoculate with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dosee5
Outcome
tobacco yieldse5
Direction
higheste5
Value
42.06%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e5

“the combination of Can inoculate with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dose consistently produced the highest tobacco yields (42.06%), growth, and mycorrhizal activity across the four years while maintaining satisfactory combustibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco growth and mycorrhizal activity were highest with Can inoculated with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dose.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
Can inoculate with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dosee5
Outcome
growth, and mycorrhizal activitye5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e5

“the combination of Can inoculate with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dose consistently produced the highest tobacco yields (42.06%), growth, and mycorrhizal activity across the four years while maintaining satisfactory combustibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variations of the recommended fertilizer dose significantly decreased mycorrhizal colonization of tobacco.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
variations of the recommended fertilizer dosee7
Outcome
percentage of mycorrhizal colonizatione7
Direction
decreasede7
Comparator
recommended fertilizer dosee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e7

“variations of the recommended fertilizer dose significantly decreased the percentage of mycorrhizal colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–2029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After four seasons, soil organic matter and exchangeable calcium and magnesium increased slightly under Can+AMF and Canavalia without inoculation.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
Can + AMF and Canavalia without inoculationse3
Outcome
soil organic matter, and availability of exchangeable calcium, magnesiume3
Direction
increased slightlye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e3

“After four growing seasons using Can + AMF and Canavalia without inoculations, soil organic matter, and availability of exchangeable calcium, magnesium, and pH increased slightly without decreasing available phosphorus and potassium contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2031–2272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH increased slightly after four seasons under Can+AMF and Canavalia without inoculation.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
Can + AMF and Canavalia without inoculationse3
Outcome
pHe3
Direction
increased slightlye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e3

“After four growing seasons using Can + AMF and Canavalia without inoculations, soil organic matter, and availability of exchangeable calcium, magnesium, and pH increased slightly without decreasing available phosphorus and potassium contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2031–2272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available phosphorus and potassium contents did not decrease after four seasons under Can+AMF and Canavalia without inoculation.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
Can + AMF and Canavalia without inoculationse3
Outcome
available phosphorus and potassium contentse3
Direction
without decreasinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e3

“After four growing seasons using Can + AMF and Canavalia without inoculations, soil organic matter, and availability of exchangeable calcium, magnesium, and pH increased slightly without decreasing available phosphorus and potassium contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2031–2272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Can+AMF significantly increased mycorrhization of tobacco roots by 110.06%.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Organ / stage
rootse6
Treatment
Can+AMFe6
Outcome
mycorrhization of tobacco rootse6
Direction
increasinge6
Value
110.06%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e6

“Can+AMF significantly increasing mycorrhization of tobacco roots by (110.06%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Can with AMF and 75% recommended mineral fertilizer treatment maintained satisfactory tobacco combustibility.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
Can inoculate with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dosee5
Outcome
combustibilitye5
Qualifier
satisfactorye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e5

“the combination of Can inoculate with AMF and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilization dose consistently produced the highest tobacco yields (42.06%), growth, and mycorrhizal activity across the four years while maintaining satisfactory combustibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1882 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Canavalia ensiformis with Glomus cubense inoculum and 75% of the recommended mineral fertilizer dose is an enhanced nutrition system for black tobacco production.

Taxon
Canavalia ensiformisCanavalia ensiformise0
Outcome
enhanced nutrition alternative system for black tobacco productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, we conclude that Canavalia ensiformis , with an inoculum based on the Glomus cubense strain and 75% of the recommended dose of mineral fertilizers, provides an enhanced nutrition alternative system for black tobacco production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2514 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 154 positive, 28 negative or no effect

153 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 187 positive, 27 negative or no effect

186 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: chemistry · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.