Paper · 2024 · Plants

Predicting Field Effectiveness of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis Inoculants for Common Bean Using Morphometric and Biochemical Markers

Oksana Markova; Svetlana Garipova; Aelita Chistoedova; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya with the commercial strain Bacillus subtilis 26D and the promising strain B. subtilis 10–4, it was found that inoculation with B. subtilis 10–4 improved seed productivity (SP) by 31–41% per plant, but only in dry years. In contrast, all 4 years of inoculation with B. subtilis 26D were ineffective or neutral. It was intended to determine the growing and biochemical characteristics of inoculated 7-day-old plants, which correlate with the field SP of bacterial preparations. The SP of inoculated plants (average of 4 years) correlated with root length (0.83), MDA content (−0.98), and catalase (CAT) activity in roots (−0.96) of week-old seedlings. High correlation coefficients between the H2O2 content in the roots and SP (0.89 and 0.77), as well as between the H2O2 content in shoots and SP (0.98 and 0.56), were observed only in two dry years, when the influence of bacteria was detected. These physiological indicators were identified as potential markers for predicting the effectiveness of the endophytic symbiosis between bean plants and B. subtilis strains. The findings may be used to develop effective microbial-based, eco-friendly technologies for bean production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. subtilis 10–4 improved bean seed productivity by 31–41% per plant, only in dry years.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Material
Ufimskayae0
Treatment
inoculation with B. subtilis 10–4e1
Interactor
B. subtilis 10–4Bacillus subtilise1symbiont
Outcome
seed productivitye1
Direction
improvede1
Value
31–41%e1
Qualifier
only in dry yearse1
Setting
four field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with B. subtilis 10–4 improved seed productivity (SP) by 31–41% per plant, but only in dry years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. subtilis 26D was ineffective or neutral for bean seed productivity in all four years.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
inoculation with B. subtilis 26De2
Interactor
B. subtilis 26DBacillus subtilise2symbiont
Outcome
seed productivitye1
Direction
ineffective or neutrale2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with B. subtilis 10–4 improved seed productivity (SP) by 31–41% per plant, but only in dry years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–321 · show in text ↑
e2

“In contrast, all 4 years of inoculation with B. subtilis 26D were ineffective or neutral”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–411 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length of week-old seedlings correlated positively with seed productivity of inoculated plants (0.83).

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
week-old seedlingse3
Outcome
root lengthe3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
0.83e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“The SP of inoculated plants (average of 4 years) correlated with root length (0.83), MDA content (−0.98), and catalase (CAT) activity in roots (−0.96) of week-old seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–751 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA content of week-old seedlings correlated negatively with seed productivity of inoculated plants (−0.98).

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
week-old seedlingse3
Compound
MDAe3
Outcome
MDA contente3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
−0.98e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“The SP of inoculated plants (average of 4 years) correlated with root length (0.83), MDA content (−0.98), and catalase (CAT) activity in roots (−0.96) of week-old seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–751 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity in roots of week-old seedlings correlated negatively with seed productivity of inoculated plants (−0.96).

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
rootse3
Gene
catalase (CAT)e3
Outcome
catalase (CAT) activity in rootse3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
−0.96e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“The SP of inoculated plants (average of 4 years) correlated with root length (0.83), MDA content (−0.98), and catalase (CAT) activity in roots (−0.96) of week-old seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–751 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In two dry years, H2O2 content in roots correlated highly with seed productivity (0.89 and 0.77).

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
rootse4
Compound
H2O2e4
Outcome
H2O2 content in the rootse4
Value
0.89 and 0.77e4
Qualifier
were observed only in two dry yearse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“High correlation coefficients between the H2O2 content in the roots and SP (0.89 and 0.77), as well as between the H2O2 content in shoots and SP (0.98 and 0.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–913 · show in text ↑
e5

“were observed only in two dry years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–950 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In two dry years, H2O2 content in shoots correlated highly with seed productivity (0.98 and 0.56).

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
shootse4
Compound
H2O2e4
Outcome
H2O2 content in shootse4
Value
0.98 and 0.56e4
Qualifier
were observed only in two dry yearse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“High correlation coefficients between the H2O2 content in the roots and SP (0.89 and 0.77), as well as between the H2O2 content in shoots and SP (0.98 and 0.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–913 · show in text ↑
e5

“were observed only in two dry years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–950 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological indicators of seedlings were identified as potential markers for predicting the effectiveness of the endophytic symbiosis with B. subtilis.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Interactor
B. subtilis strainsBacillus subtilise6symbiont
Outcome
potential markers for predicting the effectivenesse6

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to four field experiments, after the inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivar Ufimskaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“potential markers for predicting the effectiveness of the endophytic symbiosis between bean plants and B. subtilis strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1169 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The findings may be used to develop effective microbial-based, eco-friendly technologies for bean production.

Taxon
beane7
Outcome
effective microbial-based, eco-friendly technologiese7

Verbatim

e7

“develop effective microbial-based, eco-friendly technologies for bean production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1279 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.