Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil

Ali Reza Jafarnejadi; Fatemeh Meskini-Vishkaee

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Agronomy biofortification is an important crop management strategy to enhance concentrations of micronutrients in edible portions. The availability of micronutrients for plant uptake is reduced by the high salinity, pH, and lime of soils. Hence, this study aimed to determine the most appropriate time and the best ratio of zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) consumption during the wheat growth stages in a saline and calcareous soil. The experiment consisted of two factors with four levels; 0, 30, 60, and 120 kg Zn ha−1 as Zn0, Zn1, Zn2, and Zn3 respectively, and 0, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 kg Fe ha−1 as Fe0, Fe1, Fe2, and Fe3 respectively, in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The results showed that the interaction effects of Fe and Zn fertilizers application were significant on the wheat yield indices and concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat shoots and grain. The simultaneous application of 120 kg Zn ha−1 and 5 kg Fe ha−1 caused significant improvement (p < 0.05) in thousand kernel weight (9.1%) and subsequently grain yield (23.4%) compared to the control treatment. The Zn concentration in the wheat shoot during tillering (37.0–58.2 mg Zn kg−1) was higher than the other two growth stages (elongation (29.2–40.8 mg Zn kg−1) and booting (20.0–31.0 mg Zn kg−1)). While the highest Fe concentration in wheat shoots was observed at the stem elongation stage (98.5–268.8 mg Fe kg−1), then the booting stage (91.0–150.8 mg Fe kg−1) and finally the least absorption was at the tillering (80.0–120.0 mg Fe kg−1). Because of the high calcium carbonate, salinity and Zn- deficient soil of the experimental site, the Zn concentration in wheat grain was obtained in a range of 3 to 19 mg kg−1. The results clarified that the fertilizer application of 30 kg Zn ha−1 and 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 can be proportionally and simultaneously increased the concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat grain by 100%. Therefore, the soil application of 30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectare proposed for improvement in quantitative (619 kg ha−1 increase in wheat grain yield) and qualities (100% increase in grain Zn and Fe concentration and 8% increase in thousand kernel weight) indices of wheat yield in calcareous and saline soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe and Zn fertilizer interaction significantly affected wheat yield indices.

Treatment
Fe and Zn fertilizers applicatione0
Outcome
wheat yield indicese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the interaction effects of Fe and Zn fertilizers application were significant on the wheat yield indices and concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat shoots and grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe and Zn fertilizer interaction significantly affected Fe and Zn concentrations in wheat shoots and grain.

Treatment
Fe and Zn fertilizers applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat shoots and graine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the interaction effects of Fe and Zn fertilizers application were significant on the wheat yield indices and concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat shoots and grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg Zn ha−1 plus 5 kg Fe ha−1 improved thousand kernel weight by 9.1% over control.

Treatment
120 kg Zn ha−1 and 5 kg Fe ha−1e0
Outcome
thousand kernel weighte0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
9.1%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The simultaneous application of 120 kg Zn ha−1 and 5 kg Fe ha−1 caused significant improvement (p < 0.05) in thousand kernel weight (9.1%) and subsequently grain yield (23.4%) compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg Zn ha−1 plus 5 kg Fe ha−1 improved grain yield by 23.4% over control.

Treatment
120 kg Zn ha−1 and 5 kg Fe ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
23.4%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The simultaneous application of 120 kg Zn ha−1 and 5 kg Fe ha−1 caused significant improvement (p < 0.05) in thousand kernel weight (9.1%) and subsequently grain yield (23.4%) compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot Zn concentration at tillering was 37.0–58.2 mg Zn kg−1, higher than at later stages.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Outcome
Zn concentration in the wheat shoote0
Direction
highere0
Value
37.0–58.2 mg Zn kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn concentration in the wheat shoot during tillering (37.0–58.2 mg Zn kg−1) was higher than the other two growth stages (elongation (29.2–40.8 mg Zn kg−1) and booting (20.0–31.0 mg Zn kg−1)).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot Fe concentration was highest at stem elongation, 98.5–268.8 mg Fe kg−1.

Organ / stage
stem elongation stagee0
Outcome
Fe concentration in wheat shootse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
98.5–268.8 mg Fe kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the highest Fe concentration in wheat shoots was observed at the stem elongation stage (98.5–268.8 mg Fe kg−1), then the booting stage (91.0–150.8 mg Fe kg−1) and finally the least absorption was at the tillering (80.0–120.0 mg Fe kg−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot Fe concentration at booting was 91.0–150.8 mg Fe kg−1.

Organ / stage
booting stagee0
Outcome
Fe concentration in wheat shootse0
Value
91.0–150.8 mg Fe kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the highest Fe concentration in wheat shoots was observed at the stem elongation stage (98.5–268.8 mg Fe kg−1), then the booting stage (91.0–150.8 mg Fe kg−1) and finally the least absorption was at the tillering (80.0–120.0 mg Fe kg−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot Fe concentration was lowest at tillering, 80.0–120.0 mg Fe kg−1.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Outcome
Fe concentration in wheat shootse0
Direction
leaste0
Value
80.0–120.0 mg Fe kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the highest Fe concentration in wheat shoots was observed at the stem elongation stage (98.5–268.8 mg Fe kg−1), then the booting stage (91.0–150.8 mg Fe kg−1) and finally the least absorption was at the tillering (80.0–120.0 mg Fe kg−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain Zn concentration ranged from 3 to 19 mg kg−1 at the study site.

Outcome
Zn concentration in wheat graine0
Value
3 to 19 mg kg−1e0
Qualifier
high calcium carbonate, salinity and Zn- deficient soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because of the high calcium carbonate, salinity and Zn- deficient soil of the experimental site, the Zn concentration in wheat grain was obtained in a range of 3 to 19 mg kg−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 kg Zn ha−1 plus 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 increased wheat grain Fe concentration by 100%.

Treatment
30 kg Zn ha−1 and 2.5 kg Fe ha−1e0
Outcome
concentration of Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results clarified that the fertilizer application of 30 kg Zn ha−1 and 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 can be proportionally and simultaneously increased the concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat grain by 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 kg Zn ha−1 plus 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 increased wheat grain Zn concentration by 100%.

Treatment
30 kg Zn ha−1 and 2.5 kg Fe ha−1e0
Outcome
Zn in wheat graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results clarified that the fertilizer application of 30 kg Zn ha−1 and 2.5 kg Fe ha−1 can be proportionally and simultaneously increased the concentration of Fe and Zn in wheat grain by 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose 30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectare to improve wheat yield and quality in calcareous and saline soils.

Treatment
30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectaree0
Outcome
indices of wheat yielde0
Setting
calcareous and saline soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, the soil application of 30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectare proposed for improvement in quantitative (619 kg ha−1 increase in wheat grain yield) and qualities (100% increase in grain Zn and Fe concentration and 8% increase in thousand kernel weight) indices of wheat yield in calcareous and saline soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported yield increase under the proposed fertilizer regime was 619 kg ha−1.

Treatment
30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectaree0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
619 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, the soil application of 30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectare proposed for improvement in quantitative (619 kg ha−1 increase in wheat grain yield) and qualities (100% increase in grain Zn and Fe concentration and 8% increase in thousand kernel weight) indices of wheat yield in calcareous and saline soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported thousand kernel weight increase under the proposed fertilizer regime was 8%.

Treatment
30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectaree0
Outcome
thousand kernel weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, the soil application of 30 kg Zn and 2.5 kg Fe per hectare proposed for improvement in quantitative (619 kg ha−1 increase in wheat grain yield) and qualities (100% increase in grain Zn and Fe concentration and 8% increase in thousand kernel weight) indices of wheat yield in calcareous and saline soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agronomy biofortification of wheat grain in a saline and calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.