Paper · 2024 · Journal of Research in Agriculture and Food Sciences.

Effects of meliponiculture Tetragonula laeviceps on productivity, physical and chemical characteristics of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)

Muhamad Nurdiansyah; Tjokorda Indira; Khairul Burhan; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tomato plants are widely grown in Indonesia using the open agriculture system. However, the widespread application of pesticides in horticultural farming, such as tomato, has prevented pollinators from visiting flowers, contributing to decreased diversity and population due to climate change and pollen and nectar availability in agroecosystems. This study aimed to determine the effects of pollination by stingless bee (Tetragonula laeviceps) on pollination success, fruit yield, and estimated productivity on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Furthermore, the effects of T. laeviceps as a pollinator was investigated on the physical and chemical characteristics of tomato fruit. This study used two treatments: with and without meliponiculture T. laeviceps. Pollination success and fruit yield increased on with meliponiculture (30.91% and 68.68%, respectively) compared without meliponiculture. The physical (fruit weight, diameter, and mesocarp) and chemical characteristics (moisture content, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, and lycopene) of tomato fruit were not affected by T. laeviceps pollination. Meliponiculture T. laeviceps increased pollination success, fruit yield, and estimated productivity but had no effects on the physical and chemical characteristics of tomato fruit. The application of meliponiculture T. laeviceps in tomato plantations proved to be a valuable strategy for increasing productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meliponiculture increased tomato pollination success by 30.91% relative to no meliponiculture.

Taxon
tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
with meliponiculturee0
Outcome
Pollination successe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.91%e0
Comparator
without meliponiculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pollination success and fruit yield increased on with meliponiculture (30.91% and 68.68%, respectively) compared without meliponiculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meliponiculture increased tomato fruit yield by 68.68% relative to no meliponiculture.

Taxon
tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
with meliponiculturee0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
68.68%e0
Comparator
without meliponiculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pollination success and fruit yield increased on with meliponiculture (30.91% and 68.68%, respectively) compared without meliponiculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. laeviceps pollination did not affect tomato fruit weight, diameter or mesocarp.

Taxon
tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
T. laeviceps pollinatione0
Interactor
T. laevicepsTetragonula laevicepse0pollinator
Outcome
fruit weight, diameter, and mesocarpe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetragonula laeviceps
Tetragonula laeviceps · InteractorBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The physical (fruit weight, diameter, and mesocarp) and chemical characteristics (moisture content, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, and lycopene) of tomato fruit were not affected by T. laeviceps pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. laeviceps pollination did not affect fruit moisture, acidity or soluble solids.

Taxon
tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
T. laeviceps pollinatione0
Interactor
T. laevicepsTetragonula laevicepse0pollinator
Outcome
moisture content, titratable acidity, total soluble solidse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetragonula laeviceps
Tetragonula laeviceps · InteractorBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The physical (fruit weight, diameter, and mesocarp) and chemical characteristics (moisture content, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, and lycopene) of tomato fruit were not affected by T. laeviceps pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. laeviceps pollination did not affect fruit ascorbic acid or lycopene.

Taxon
tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
T. laeviceps pollinatione0
Interactor
T. laevicepsTetragonula laevicepse0pollinator
Outcome
ascorbic acid, and lycopenee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetragonula laeviceps
Tetragonula laeviceps · InteractorBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The physical (fruit weight, diameter, and mesocarp) and chemical characteristics (moisture content, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, and lycopene) of tomato fruit were not affected by T. laeviceps pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meliponiculture increased estimated tomato productivity.

Taxon
tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
Meliponiculture T. laevicepse0
Interactor
T. laevicepsTetragonula laevicepse0pollinator
Outcome
estimated productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetragonula laeviceps
Tetragonula laeviceps · InteractorBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meliponiculture T. laeviceps increased pollination success, fruit yield, and estimated productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend T. laeviceps meliponiculture to increase tomato productivity.

Taxon
tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)Solanum lycopersicumt0
Interactor
T. laevicepsTetragonula laevicepse0pollinator
Outcome
application of meliponiculture T. laeviceps in tomato plantationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetragonula laeviceps
Tetragonula laeviceps · InteractorBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of meliponiculture T. laeviceps in tomato plantations proved to be a valuable strategy for increasing productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 · show in text ↑

pollination · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pollination · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pollination · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.